[Veritas-ha] VCS 5.0 MP1: issue probing disk-group !?

2008-10-21 Thread Pascal Grostabussiat
Hi, I have experiencing a weird issue since yesterday and I cannot get that solve buy surfing and checking around. So I hope to get a hint using the mailing-list. Our sysadmin recently installed a system with two Sun SPARC for me with VxVM, VxFS and VCS. In short I have VERITAS Foundation 5.0

[Veritas-ha] Veritas - SFRAC PrivNIC failover problem

2008-10-21 Thread Scott3, James
We have a 4-node cluster running SF-RAC 5.0MP1 on Solaris in which we're using the PrivNIC option on the private interconnect for oracle RAC communications. The problem we're having is that the interface is not failing over fast enough to prevent oracle RAC from rebooting one of the nodes. My

Re: [Veritas-ha] VCS 5.0 MP1: issue probing disk-group !?

2008-10-21 Thread Jim Senicka
Is the disk group agent running on the systems? Has the cluster been started since you created the service group definition? Are all resources enabled in the service groups? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal Grostabussiat Sent:

Re: [Veritas-ha] VCS 5.0 MP1: issue probing disk-group !?

2008-10-21 Thread Pascal Grostabussiat
To Jim, Scott and Gene. Jim Senicka wrote: Is the disk group agent running on the systems? Yes it is: root 16295 1 0 16:16:01 ? 1:29 /opt/VRTSvcs/bin/DiskGroup/DiskGroupAgent -type DiskGroup Has the cluster been started since you created the service group definition?

Re: [Veritas-ha] VCS 5.0 MP1: issue probing disk-group !?

2008-10-21 Thread Gene Henriksen
Can you put the SG info from main.cf in an email so we can see the configuration? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pascal Grostabussiat Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:11 AM Cc: Veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha]

Re: [Veritas-ha] Veritas - SFRAC PrivNIC failover problem

2008-10-21 Thread Chethan Hublikar
What is the css misscount set to? Craig Simpson wrote: At one point we switched Oracles interconnect to UDP, and Veritas stayed at LLT. 2 interconnect switches. When a primary path errored, yes, all nodes switched to the second switch. It worked under load. So might not be much help, but I