-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shashi
Kanth Boddula
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 7:30 AM
To: Mayank Vasa
Cc: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] vxfencing >2 nodes
Agreed. But is it even possible to run fencing on a w*dows system? /A---Andreas LundgrenTechnical Account Manager | Steria ABKarlsrov 2D, Box 544, SE-182 15 Danderyd, SwedenMobile: +46-709-214381Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -To: "Shash
n.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] vxfencing >2 nodes
Ok, thanks for clarification.
I have seen many clustering products documentation which says that
fencing/quorum is optional/not_required for more than 2 node clusters,
and they says that there is very very less chance of happening split
brain c
Ok, thanks for clarification.
I have seen many clustering products documentation which says that
fencing/quorum is optional/not_required for more than 2 node clusters,
and they says that there is very very less chance of happening split
brain condition for more than 2 node clusters.
-- Shashi
Ma
Shashi:
The number of nodes is not a decision making factor for fencing. For a
cluster greater than 2 nodes, fencing helps to protect your data in the
case of a split brain scenario.
SFRAC requires fencing. It is not supported without it.
Regards,
+ Mayank
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
