Can't connect. SVN Server changed domain name, but Versions is using old domain name to connect to svn.

2010-01-07 Thread LazloHollyfeld
Okay, I had Versions connecting to my SVN server just perfectly when it was located at my old office. I then had to change physical location of the server and then map a new domain name to the server. So, I go into Versions, change the URL for the bookmark of the repository and it seems to authent

Re: Can't connect. SVN Server changed domain name, but Versions is using old domain name to connect to svn.

2010-01-07 Thread Dirk Stoop
Hi Lazlo, That's a relatively simple problem to fix, but you'll have to use the command line for it, as there's no implementation of this SVN feature in Versions yet. While you changed the URL for your repository bookmark, the .svn metadata that's stored inside of all folders in your working copy

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread Dirk Stoop
Hi Bob, I'm sorry you weren't able to take advantage of the promotion. We understand that our timing may not have been great for some, but plenty of people still found out about the promotion and were able to take advantage of it. There'll be other promotions, and as always, anyone who takes the

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread Bob Futrelle
You addressed the offer's timing issue, but you did note, I'm sure, my comments, > But until the steady stream of email about Versions bugs/problems subsides, > I'm still playing a waiting game. Cornerstone may be better, but I'm still > waiting for some clarification from them. In the meantime,

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread Quinn Taylor
Judging based on other people's problems may not be the wisest choice, though. I personally have been using Versions since the beta, and there have been minor bumps, but on the whole I've been very satisfied and have had very few issues. Versions has quickly become an important part of my workfl

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread john
Am 07.01.2010 um 17:02 schrieb Bob Futrelle: >> But until the steady stream of email about Versions bugs/problems > subsides, >> I'm still playing a waiting game. I don't get it. What steady stream? I am subscribe to a couple of list like this and I feel there is hardly any traffic here, comp

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread Bob Futrelle
Thanks for your various comments. When and if the grant we just submitted is funded I will seriously compare and consider Versions and Cornerstone. But now my research budget is tight and we have had basically no problems working with our current Subclipse setup. We're a small lab in a university

Re: Can't connect. SVN Server changed domain name, but Versions is using old domain name to connect to svn.

2010-01-07 Thread LazloHollyfeld
Hi Dirk, Thank you for the detailed reply--much appreciated. I went snooping around the hidden .svn folder in the folder containing my local working copy, and found that a file called 'entries' contained my old URL. So, just to check, I changed that URL to the new one, and then Versions was able

using svn:// url with passwd & svnserve.conf on NAS results in "Authorization failed"

2010-01-07 Thread mort8104
Am I missing something here? I am running a Subversion daemon on my NAS box as per this procedure: http://forum.synology.com/wiki/index.php/Step-by-step_guide_to_installing_Subversion_on_ARM-based_Synology_Products I have successfully migrated my repositories to the NAS (using svnadmin dump and

Re: using svn:// url with passwd & svnserve.conf on NAS results in "Authorization failed"

2010-01-07 Thread Quinn Taylor
Do you get the same problems accessing this URL via Terminal? On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:07 PM, mort8104 wrote: > Am I missing something here? > > I am running a Subversion daemon on my NAS box as per this procedure: > > http://forum.synology.com/wiki/index.php/Step-by-step_guide_to_installing_Subver

Re: 20% Discount on Versions

2010-01-07 Thread mort8104
> You addressed the offer's timing issue, but you did note, I'm sure, my > comments... Why so militant? You came in specifically to have a poke at a piece of software that you have never used. You then returned when the polite responder did not rise to the bait and tried once again to elicit a re

Re: using svn:// url with passwd & svnserve.conf on NAS results in "Authorization failed"

2010-01-07 Thread mort8104
Thanks for your amazingly quick reply Quinn : ) Well, yes. The problem is identical. My apologies - I should have tried that before posting. With anon-access = none I get: svn: No access allowed to this repository With anon-access = read I can checkout, but when I try to commit I get: svn: Co

Re: using svn:// url with passwd & svnserve.conf on NAS results in "Authorization failed"

2010-01-07 Thread Quinn Taylor
On Jan 7, 2010, at 3:42 PM, mort8104 wrote: > Thanks for your amazingly quick reply Quinn : ) > > Well, yes. The problem is identical. > > My apologies - I should have tried that before posting. > > With anon-access = none I get: > > svn: No access allowed to this repository > > With anon-ac