Ain't that the truth!
Wayne
--- On Tue, 11/30/10, Allan Fish wrote:
From: Allan Fish
Subject: Re: [VFB] Tony's Canoe
To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 4:11 PM
>Hello, Anthony Spezio,
>
>...looks like a piece of art
>Thomas
I've seen it. It IS a piece of art
Hi All;
Saw this webcam on ebay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/12-0-Mega-USB-6-LED-Webcam-Web-Cam-Camera-PC-Laptop-Mic-/170544645704?pt=PCA_Video_Conferencing_Webcams&hash=item27b540c648
Any idea if it's any good? Would it be usefull for tying instruction?
Wayne
--
You received this mes
Wayne:
I just noticed the following statement at the bottom of the page - I was
thinking Camera pixels.
"Our webcam pixel mean picture pixel, it is not camera pixel . Webcam pixel
is the product of multiplication between the width of capture and the length
of capture. Pixel has dynamic pixe
Wayne:
There's only one way to find out. Seems very cheap for 12 megapixels.
Neville Gosling
_
From: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com [mailto:vfb-m...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Wayne Blake-Hedges
Sent: December-01-10 4:45 AM
To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [VFB] Webcam
What does that all mean.
Tony
--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Neville Gosling wrote:
From: Neville Gosling
Subject: [VFB] Webcam
To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 11:00 AM
Wayne:
I just noticed the following statement at the bottom of the
page – I
Neville, I have an associate degree in Pixology and I don't have
the foggiest idea what you're talking about. ROTFLMAO 1
JD
>What does that all mean.
>Tony
>
>--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Neville Gosling wrote:
>
>From: Neville Gosling
>Subject: [VFB] Webcam
>To: vfb-mail@googlegroups.com
>Date: Wedn
Where's HANS W. when we need him??!
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [VFB] Webcam
Neville, I have an associate degree in Pixology and I don't have
the foggiest idea what you're talking about. ROTFLMAO 1
JD
What does that a
I'm not Hans, but I can add.
that's today advertising style. Because most buyer think, that you need
as much pixel as possible, the seller try to show as much as possible.
In this case it is a 3 Meg Pixel camera, and with some rhetoric tricks
they upgraded to 12.
I won't use a 12 Mpix as webcam. Yo
Hi Neville;
I consider myself fairly tech savy but can't quite comprehend what they're
saying. Is the 12 megapixel rating with software enhancement and the actual
megapixel rating is thus much lower?
Either way, seems like a cheap try at getting a potentially useable webcam.
Wayne
--- On
The 1.3 megapixl webcam my son gave me cost 33.00 plus tax. Says it will take
stills to 5.2 Megapixl "Interpolated" whatever that means. It is also writtin
in Spanish, LOL. It does not have lights or mic. I think 6.00 is cheap for
something that will work at all. I have not gone back to the stor
Thanks Rene,
To someone like me from the old school even before television, that is clear.
Is my 1.3 Megapixel good enough to send and recieve tying instruction or should
I try to upgrade to a 3 Meg.
Tony
--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Rene Zillmann wrote:
From: Rene Zillmann
Subject: Re: [VFB] Webcam
T
Tony, the answer is simple,
do the following math:
you have a screen resolution (on your pc), of .. say .. 1280 time 1024
pixel (that is the resolution of my pc), so, that is 1.3 Meg Pixel. That
means, with your camera (the 1.3 Mpix) you would send a full screen
video my way. If the cam has more pi
12 matches
Mail list logo
