[videoblogging] 2006: year of user video

2005-12-25 Thread Jay dedman
http://donatacom.com/papers/pomo51.htm others are realizing what we all realize. jay -- Adventures in Videoblogging http://www.momentshowing.net> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get B

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Joshua Kinberg
> 2006 will be the year when we finally get a terminology that distinguishes > between stuff like Rocketboom.com and Charlene scratchtv.com - both are > technically videoblogs, but they are very different forms/genres of media in > my opinion. Please... the "Rocketboom Vs. Personal Media" dis

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
2006, the year I sold out Sorry, just my personal goal. In a final coup d'etat I'm want to get a contract with a hollywood studio. I want to have a deal inked to produce a movie on my media pyramid scheme, much like startup.com before the bubble on this thing bursts. We're going to sell pe

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Michael Sullivan
fuk yer evilvlog.unless you sign me up.you afraid of the sull?On 12/10/05, R. Kristiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: There are many predictions for 2006, and Alex Barnett has made a collection of some of them: http://blogs.msdn.com/alexbarn/archive/2005/12/01/499237.aspx Personally I vouch f

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Loiez D.
I was writing this post and.. Paul, Markus, Enric was calling me on Skype LOL Videobloging is alone a spirit We are making the futur THX all Loiez ( going to sleep) Le 11 déc. 05 à 01:17, Loiez D. a écrit : > For me ( and may be for french vloggers ) it's the most important > And may be there

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Loiez D.
For me ( and may be for french vloggers ) it's the most importantAnd may be there is other waysRB=short program=TVCR=art VID=other diffusionTV= No vloggerVlog= New blog ?Vlog= New TV ?$=TVNo$=vlogLoiezI think vlogging is a neLe 10 déc. 05 à 15:57, R. Kristiansen a écrit :2006 will be the year whe

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread R. Kristiansen
There are many predictions for 2006, and Alex Barnett has made a collection of some of them: http://blogs.msdn.com/alexbarn/archive/2005/12/01/499237.aspx Personally I vouch for these: 2006 will be the year of bi-directional rss feeds (SSE) for the early adopters 2006 will be the year when w

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Markus Sandy
the problem is: we already went through that year back in the 70's with good old 'tricky Richard' ;) now that would have been a great time to videoblog! Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: At 1:32 -0800 10/12/05, Markus Sandy wrote: so I was thinking "year of the Richard" ..

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
At 1:32 -0800 10/12/05, Markus Sandy wrote: >>so I was thinking "year of the Richard" ... sounds catchy ... >it's awfully tempting to shorten that ;) And of course as Richard's, we'd find it really funny, because we've never been called it before either. ;-) Regards, Richard ---

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Markus Sandy
it's awfully tempting to shorten that ;) Richard Show wrote: so I was thinking "year of the Richard" ... sounds catchy ... On 12/9/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >.com bubble 2.0 > >In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each >other,

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-10 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
Year of redundant conceptualizations. On 10/12/05 5:30 AM, "Michael Meiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .com bubble 2.0 > > In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each > other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) > > -Mike > > On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Andreas Haugstru

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Show
so I was thinking "year of the Richard" ... sounds catchy ...On 12/9/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:>.com bubble 2.0>>In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each >other, because it's the two-way bubble. :)And then we clean up the mess with AJAX?(You do

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Markus Sandy
yes, the joke translates well here Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: .com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
>.com bubble 2.0 > >In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each >other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser in the U.S. right?) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Meiser
.com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a son

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Ted Tagami
2006: IP Media.On 12/9/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroot

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Markus Sandy
Year of the Node Michael Sullivan wrote: >So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? > >Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? >Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) >Year of the Portable Vlog ? >Year of the Video Filters ? >Year of Grassroots Media ? > > >-- >sull >-

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Michael Sullivan wrote: > So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? > > Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? > Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) > Year of the Portable Vlog ? > Year of the Video Filters ? > Year of Grassroots Media ? 2006: Year of the Mundane...

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a song. On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:26:23 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or corporate passover... > > At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: >> Or Corporate handover

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: >Or Corporate handover ? >;-) > >On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So, who is going to coin a new

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? > > > > Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? > > Y

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? > > Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? > Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) > Year of the Portable Vlog ? > Year of the Video Filters ? >

[videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -