[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-10 Thread missbhavens1969
My feed actually isn't sitting there unclaimed...the videos of mine that I found in Veohville were culled from other people's unclaimed feeds. They aggreed to remove them individually via their permalinks (they were gone in a day). I have no idea how it can be prevented from happening

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-10 Thread David Howell
I'm doing that. Yes, it is annoying. I dont trust that they didnt know what they were doing and I dont trust that they wont do it again when the stink has cleared. David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...am I

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-10 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,If you had control of your web server you could check the referrer url, and if it came from Veoh, then just block it.(I've heard it's pretty easy to do with Apache.)See ya On 4/10/06, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My feed actually isn't sitting there unclaimed...the videos of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-10 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:33:19 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you had control of your web server you could check the referrer url, and if it came from Veoh, then just block it. (I've heard it's pretty easy to do with Apache.) And it's even for the spider not to

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread Enric
I have two feeds, Cirne (http://www.cirne.com/vlog) and Tech Alley (http://techalley.cirne.com). I have claimed Cirne. I asked them to remove Tech Alley, which they did. Simple. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My simple question...

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread David Howell
My understanding is all it takes is an email to them to have yourself removed. That takes all but 2 minutes. So...why havent you done that? Yes. I agree that you shouldnt have to. David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread David Howell
Well...actually Eric. My question was to those with feeds there that are still unclaimed. With all the hoopla that happened yesterday, I am curious why there are still unclaimed feeds. Thanks David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread David Howell
Well...I dont really see what they did as a problem. I am pretty sure that their spidering or non-spidering does exactly what it was intended to do and is working quite well. I dont see it as a renegade process that's gone HAL on everyone. That's another discussion though. Thanks for your

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
reminder... (not directed to anyone in particular) remember RO? he put up videoblogging-universe.com and a few cool features for vloggers. this is spidering and re-hosting 'previews' transcoded to flv or swf or mp4 (depends). this is also how it is done right! but how does this play into

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread David Howell
Vlogdir hates me. I think you deleted my account or something. Damn you... ;) David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (which is why vlogdir doesnt work that way). sull On 4/9/06, David Howell [EMAIL

[videoblogging] Re: Simple Question

2006-04-09 Thread David Howell
Got it. So like...now I gotta give you flowers now? *chuckle* David http://www.davidhowellstudios.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: searched for 'tao'. returned this: http://vlogdir.com/permalink/822 On 4/9/06, David Howell [EMAIL