Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-26 Thread Andy Carvin
Kunga wrote: Is this ok? And how is it you think I am spamming? I don't think so. I guess I needed to be hit over the head to know what others perceive as spam which I do not? Like Stephanie said, even if it's not technically spam, it can seem spammy to a lot of people because messages

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-26 Thread Beth Agnew
I like the term gushy. Kunga was definitely gushy. Some good info, but a lot in a short period of time. Like a new oil well -- you want it, but under control. Thanks for shortening that sig, too, Taylor! Andy Carvin wrote: Like Stephanie said, even if it's not technically spam, it can seem

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
Watkins To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:06 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically Spams liek most other terms, it suffers from definition leakage at heperimeters.I dont think anybody is comparing you

[videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Steve Watkins
Just for the sake of clarity I think you mean one enclosure per post. Feed refers more to the entire RSS file. By the way I have a request. Could people try to cut out the yahoo sponsorshipp stuff out of the emails when they reply to them? The reason is that the sponsorship URLs are very long

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Kunga
Good Point. Of course that is what I meant. I see in re-reading it that I wrote it wrong. Thanks for noticing my mistake. I really appreciate you having the courage to correct me. Taylor Barcroft FutureMedia Video Journalist Santa Cruz CA Beach of the Silicon Valley

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Clint Sharp
Anders Clerwall wrote: Since I'm not afraid of you either Taylor, I'll ask you to please remove that 12K image you include in your mails. Eats my gmail storage slowly but steadily, especially since you're quite active on this list. Thanks, -- Anders Clerwall blog: http://iscav.com/

[videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread chris_koehn
I've been back a few days now, and already I have noticed that Kunga is quite the spammer. I mean prolific poster ;) Now that I mention it, like 2 people remember me haha. I'll stop talking now. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Clint Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anders Clerwall wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Kunga
Is this ok? And how is it you think I am spamming? I don't think so. I guess I needed to be hit over the head to know what others perceive as spam which I do not? May I include a photograph once a day? I wish all of you would. I got mine down to 4k. I thought I was being creative. Taylor

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Stephanie Bryant
On 8/25/05, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this ok? And how is it you think I am spamming? I don't think so. I guess I needed to be hit over the head to know what others perceive as spam which I do not? Sometimes when someone posts frequently to a group, it's called spammy or spamming even

[videoblogging] Re: Two Posts Today Both Came In Automatically

2005-08-25 Thread Steve Watkins
Spams liek most other terms, it suffers from definition leakage at he perimeters. I dont think anybody is comparing you to spammers that bulk-email millions of people with dodgy adverts. But it seems from the history of this list so far, that there are a few other factors which can cause people