> I'm new to the list. And new to the vlog - video podcast space. Not new to
> video though. Still a vlog virgin. Still conceptualizing how I want to make
> my first impression.
hey taylor--
i think you just need to make it simple.
everyone is getting all riled up thinking they need to make
interesting and simple ;-)
thanks.-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born"- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://vlogdir.com
On Aug 5, 2005, at 12:34 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:7. hot-linking with an http://http file structure to hide source of video when pulling from another domain.been curious about this one. feel free to explain ;-)This is a neat feature you can set up on your server which I was introduced to throug
i know man... i just like complaining about it i like apple a
lot. but i dont like the idea of their name brands being injected
too much... and iTunes strategies have bothered me as well
at the end of the day, it's all good.. no offense, i'm just running my mind.
sullOn 8/5/05, Pete
Michael Sullivan wrote:
>>I'm just wondering why you would need to squat on nine good blogspot
>>names, is all
>
>
> good names? egads!... I hate the word podcast!!! damn apple! LOL
> never never should a brand name be in a universal term that labels
> delivering content, especially ope
I'm just wondering why you would need to squat on nine good blogspot
names, is all
good names? egads!... I hate the word podcast!!! damn apple! LOL
never never should a brand name be in a universal term that labels delivering content, especially open content!
A!
I have owned an ar
On 8/4/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HI everyone,
> I'm new to the list. And new to the vlog - video podcast space. Not new to
> video though. Still a vlog virgin. Still conceptualizing how I want to make
> my first impression.
...
> I just set up all these blogs to address differe
did you buy podcast hacks yet?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0596100663/qid=1123250310/sr=8-7/ref=pd_bbs_sbs_7/002-1961305-4934429?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
On 8/4/05, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jay dedman wrote:>> well, the first book on videoblogging is about to be
yep, aware of those methods, andreas... thanks though... Andrew may be referring to something else, or not. On 8/5/05, Andreas Haugstrup <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:34:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> 7. hot-linking with an http://http file structure
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 06:34:05 +0200, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 7. hot-linking with an http://http file structure to hide source of
>> video
>> when pulling from another domain.
>
> been curious about this one. feel free to explain ;-)
Not completely sure what Andrew is
> 5. creating various MAX/MSP Jitter patches for compressing,
> streaming, looping and effecting video
>
wow.. there's actually one i already know how to do!!!
actually while i've been posting very few videos lately i have been
delving back into my (ahem..) interactive video roots... i'v
HI everyone,I'm new to the list. And new to the vlog - video podcast space. Not new to video though. Still a vlog virgin. Still conceptualizing how I want to make my first impression.Congratulations Jay, Verdi, Ryan and Kinberg. I am embarrassed to say I have not been in the Vlog space for the pa
7. hot-linking with an
http://http file structure to hide source of video when pulling from another domain.
been curious about this one. feel free to explain ;-)
and yeah, we all think its sweet (tries not to hop on the 'ubercool'
bandwagon) that they are going to prep a book for release
Yeah, please don't mistake my criticism of the series title as a
criticism of either the book or others in the series. In reading over
Andrew's E-mail, I think that there are a great deals of hacks that a
videoblogger could employ; at the same time, I think that
videoblogging in and of
I don't think anyone is Against this book. In fact, the discussion
about the hacks etc, at least for me, was a question of whether that
general topic was the best to have for the first book on
videoblogging.
Let's all make sure that the hacks in this book edited/written by four
friends of ours
For what it's worth, I think it's a great idea. O'Reily books are
great (from a geek point of view) and it is a great way to get more
people on the videoblog train.
Congrats to Jay and all who are involved.
On 8/4/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am surprised to hear t
I am surprised to hear the number of people who think this Oriley
hacks thing is a bad idea. I think it's probably the greatest honor
yet to come out of the whole videoblogging group. I have Spidering
Hacks and Google Hacks and they are exceptionally great.
Oriely is editing the book so
I agree with Clint on this one... While everything in the book will
work out really well within the format, I don't like O'Reily is doing
to the word "hacks."
Josh
On Aug 4, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Clint Sharp wrote:
> Jay dedman wrote:
>
> >
> > why dont you think its the correct format?
> >
O'Reilly put out some of the best books in the business and treat
their writers right. You guys are lucky to get in with them. Yay!
--Stephanie
On 8/4/05, Josh Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm a little biased so feel free to take this post with a grain of
> salt. But, even before I
On 8/4/05, R. Kristiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok, now i know what hacks means in this context...
> > i dont know that their can be 100 vlog hacks. i suppose..
> > more likely, you can come up with 100 DV hacks or Web Dev hac
On Aug 4, 2005, at 3:57 PM, Clint Sharp wrote:
> A hack implies there's an established way to do something that you
> have
> now found an alternative way of doing. Usually you've done it
> surripticiously (sp?), without the manufacturers knowledge or consent.
> In this case, there is no est
On 8/4/05, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, now i know what hacks means in this context...
> i dont know that their can be 100 vlog hacks. i suppose..
> more likely, you can come up with 100 DV hacks or Web Dev hacks or Hardware
> hacks.. which are all vlog related.
> for a
ok, now i know what hacks means in this context...
i dont know that their can be 100 vlog hacks. i suppose..
more likely, you can come up with 100 DV hacks or Web Dev hacks or Hardware hacks.. which are all vlog related.
for a first book, i dont think this is the right genre... but its not reall
Jay dedman wrote:
>
> why dont you think its the correct format?
> if you look at the new Digital Video hacks by Josh-Paul(on this
> list)...he lays out the basics...and then gets into all the cool added
> stuff you can do.
>
> With videoblogging, all you need is freevlog to get started.
> eve
Okay, I'm a little biased so feel free to take this post with a grain of salt. But, even before I wrote for O'Reilly, I had more of their (his?) books than I could count off the top of my head. The distribution is wide, the quality is high, and there's definitely a level of respect and validati
> seriously though... this should be an eBook... downloadable No?
> easily updatable since things move so fast and some things become obsolete.
> and it would have bene cool if this was tried on an independent publishing
> approach sell or give away via the internet.
> optional pri
> Of all their formats they could have chosen to put you in, the 100 Hacks
> format is definitely not the right one. I would have thought O'Reilly
> would have been more clueful than that, oh well. Congratulations on the
> book deal.
why dont you think its the correct format?
if you look at
Jay dedman wrote:
>
> well, the first book on videoblogging is about to be written...by all
> of us.
> Verdi, Ryan, Kinberg and myself wrote a proposal for O'reilly last month.
> They accepted.
> We have 6 weeks to produce 100 hacks on videoblogging.
> If we pull it off, it could be in stores
I think there's a hack-a-day website Anyway, why not start
collecting this stuff through an open collaborative blog? It'll be fun
to follow, stimulate ideas... and your crazy if you think anyone will
be able to rip you off or it will reduce the value of the book. It'll
also generat
seriously though... this should be an eBook... downloadable No?
easily updatable since things move so fast and some things become obsolete.
and it would have bene cool if this was tried on an independent publishing approach sell or give away via the internet.
optional printed copies on
woops, i already wrote it.
would you like a signed copy?
sullOn 8/4/05, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somebody Will be writing the first book about vlogging (isn't IDG> working on it already behind the scene?), there will be a "Vlogging> for Dummies" book before the end of this year
> Somebody Will be writing the first book about vlogging (isn't IDG
> working on it already behind the scene?), there will be a "Vlogging
> for Dummies" book before the end of this year or perhaps early 06, and
> there will be all kinds of tutorials out there. The good thing, for
> me, is that
32 matches
Mail list logo
