Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

That's cool; thanks for sharing the vlog Renovating Michael with us, Sully. I enjoyed watching that. Harold [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

That's a great idea. If some who owns any of the books wants to add something, you can source it by including the code below at the end of the information you're introducing. For example: It is common knowledge that Videobloggers do it daily.{{cite book |coauthors= Michael Verdi, Ryanne Hodson,

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

thanks sull! that really helped. I think I've met Patrick and friends briefly at Vloggercon06? Puts this in a slightly different light for me. Now you are not a total stranger. See how a little video can change your perspective? Amazing. Not sure it helps with the general argument in any way

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

So who wants to go through the 3 vlogging books written by this community and then jsut cite them in the wikipedia entry. isnt that all we have to do? I am sure that they devine vlog in there along with some od the genres etc right? where are all those academic papers folks have written? arent tho

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Hi Markus, I don't have a vlog anymore but I used to do cookingkittycorner.blogspot.com As you can see from the results from the ban attempt, I have in fact been trying to stick up for the vlog article. It was changes i made to the article nearly a year ago that saved it from getting deleted. (

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Markus, Meet Pat and his condo. http://mirror21.video.blip.tv/RenovatingMichael-EpisodeSixPatsCondo951.mov On 5/3/07, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HI Patrick, > > When I saw your initial post, I thought "why is he posting in the wrong > thread?" and then I looked more carefully

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

HI Patrick, When I saw your initial post, I thought "why is he posting in the wrong thread?" and then I looked more carefully and got your "joke". When you posted the "text version", I thought "is he now spamming?" But I assume you have a different default char set than me and hence the funny

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

On 5/3/07, pdelongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > “Is it just me, and I don't mean to sound bad faith here, or > isn't User:MichaelVerdi > very knowldgable about this situation for a user with an 11 hour old > account? Maybe they editted the p

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

I fail to see how any of those quotes mean anything is over ... what I do see is that the tone of an email you sent to a community that says they feel wronged by you just shows (yet again) that you get off on greifing people. please take your 'na-na-na-na-na-na' posts with you as you go off to tr

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Patrick, the deal is that many of us don't think of this as lighthearted. You've fucked with the wikipedia article for almost a year now. It's time to stop. - Verdi On 5/3/07, Patrick Delongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Mike, > > I didn't mean for it to seam like you were threatening

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Hey Mike, I didn't mean for it to seam like you were threatening me. Sorry. It was just meant as a lighthearted reflection of the topics currently being discussed in the group. pd On 5/3/07, Michael Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/3/07, pdelongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

On 5/3/07, pdelongchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and now ladies and gentlemen, ...your moment of zen. (please accept this > as humour with only a tinge of bitterness) > > "This user - Pdelongchamp - constantly fucks with the entry. [...] It's > pathetic. I can't believe Meiser still has th

Re: [videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers (plain text version)

Hey group, The results are back from Mmeiser's proposed Wikipedia ban of pdelongchamp. See what each Wikipedia Administrator had to say about it: "I fail to see why there should be any consideration of a ban. Unreferenced material is not welcome on Wikipedia." - EdJohnston 23:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[videoblogging] Threats and male vloggers

Hey group, The results of the Mmeiser’s Wikipedia ban are here. See what each Wikipedia Administrator had to say about it: “I fail to see why there should be any consideration of a ban. Unreferenced material is not welcome on Wikipedia.” - EdJohnston