Most DVCAM decks will also play miniDV. But his will likely only work with PAL
Definitely go for a PAL MiniDV camera is my advice.
Once compressed to mp4 for internet, it will be viewable on any computer,
joly
At 11:39 AM 12/18/2005, you wrote:
Thanks Paul, All:
That was helpful. I
Hi Vincent,
Pal is the accepted format for most of the world, but it's not entirely future proof. The best thing to do is to get a HD camera, Sony and Panasonic do HD cameras, they are expensive, now but well worth it when it comes down to editing in the future. Pal has a frames per second rate
Hi Paul,
Pal has a frames per second rate of 25 where as ntsc has 29.7, which
in real terms means you get slightly better video reproduction on
ntsc
While I'd ordinarily jump in and correct you here, you say you were a
TV tech, so you should probably correct yourself. :-)
While NTSC has a
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:38:41 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While NTSC has a higher frame rate, PAL has a higher scan line count
and more accurate colour reproduction, so it is just plain wrong to
say that you get slightly better video reproducion on NTSC.
I thought
HI richard,ohh who's the smarty pants. All I do is offer a little advice on a subject that no-one bothered to answer to and then I am corrected by someone like yourself, who jumps right in there just to correct me. When the real point of having a pal camera or an ntsc camera is whether or not
Just a pity that you have nothing else better to do with your Sundays.
May be you should have answered this before me, then we wouldn't be
having this mass-debate(pun) now.
I wasn't answering the original question, because I didn't know the
answer, and may have posted incorrect information.
Hey Richard
No hard feeling there.
Paul
On 18 Dec 2005, at 13:03, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:
>Just a pity that you have nothing else better to do with your Sundays.
>May be you should have answered this before me, then we wouldn't be
>having this mass-debate(pun) now.
I wasn't
ha, very punny
Paul Knight wrote:
Hey Richard
No hard feeling there.
Paul
On 18 Dec 2005, at 13:03, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:
Just a pity that you have nothing else better to
do
with your Sundays.
May be you should have answered this before me, then we
Thanks Paul, All:That was helpful. I didn't think it mattered if in the end it ended up online. However, your point about previewing on TV seems relevant. My partner in Kenya has also mentioned the use of a DVCam Deck (I think because he too has a background in TV). Do you know if DV Deck's
Thanks Paul, All:
That was helpful. I didn't think it mattered if in the end it ended up online.
However, your point about previewing on TV seems relevant. My partner in Kenya
has also mentioned the use of a DVCam Deck (I think because he too has a
background in TV). Do you know if DV
Vincent,
Unforunately, I have only limited experience of dv decks, I have used one before in Video Production Class, I didn't notice whether it had any relevance to pal or ntsc. But when exporting into Final Cut, or Imovie, one has to set wether it is DV pal or DV ntsc, I am only guessing but I
Vincent,
Unforunately, I have only limited experience of dv decks, I have used one
before in Video Production Class, I didn't notice whether it had any relevance
to pal or ntsc. But when exporting into Final Cut, or Imovie, one has to set
wether it is DV pal or DV ntsc, I am only
Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really
matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be
filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL half of the world and my
friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter?
regards,
13 matches
Mail list logo
