Hey everybody,
Excuse me if this has already been covered on this topic - I haven't
had time to read all.
Handbrake recently released a new update which allows 640x480 H264
iPod compatible conversion, so I asked them what the secret sauce was
for their ffmpeg.
They pointed me to the post
File size is always an issue. Especially so if you think a 10 min. 120
megabyte file ain't no thing.
With a 1.5 megabit connection the download will take 10:40 - ASSUMING you
can use all your available bandwidth for the download (not going to
happen).
More realistically you will get
The difference in framerate was HUGE for our show.
We do a lot of high energy, high velocity action footage.
I thought it looked good on 15fps, but then someone here said that
moving to 29.97 wouldn't double the file size, or double the bitrate
(I think it was you Elbows...). I did and our
-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wazman_au
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:29 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Apple TV and iPod clash
Mike,
Great. How about sharing the secret with those of us who'd like
What matters is mb per min what's the math with division involved?
jen
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:11 pm, Bill Cammack wrote:
BTW, Today's http://Galacticast.com :
AppleTV version = 203 mb.
iPod version = 98 mb.
3gp version = 17 mb.
--
Bill C.
BillCammack.com
--- In
, 2007 1:29 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Apple TV and iPod clash
Mike,
Great. How about sharing the secret with those of us who'd like to
encode the vids ourselves???
What sort of file size are we talking? Let's talk megabytes per minute
at 640x480.
Waz
for low and high speed networks due to demand.
Sent via CrackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:29:38
To:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Apple TV and iPod clash
I think people stick to 4:3 most often
