i should let this conversation die...but it brings up so many good issues.
David is also a good sport.
I saw this video today:
http://waxy.org/random/video/shining_redux.mov
Its completely illegal and the creator should be jailed and sued
according to our current copyright law.
i think its
I pirate a copy of Final Cut Pro.but i consistently buy macs and all of its products.
symbiotic relationship.
This logic only works when the same company is making hardware AND
software. They may take a loss on the pirated software, but if people
have to have a powerful computer to use it,
On Sep 21, 2005, at 9:20 PM, David Yirchott wrote:
Fair Use is a broad guideline open to interpretation. If you don't
have
legal representation that can beat a team of lawyers for a major media
conglomerate, I would definitely advise thinking twice before using
any
copyrighted material.
don't know, but I do know now that all musicians who sample work pay for rights to use the samples, even when making a new work derived from samples.Ah...you mean all the artists on the radio, who have paid and been granted permission. You are excluding the thousands who cannot afford to pay
Would Fidel have a case?http://canf.org/es/chistes/FUNNY-AS-HELL-Strohs-NEED-SPEAKERS.mpegNot under copyright law, I don't thinkstroh's probably paid whoever taped that for the rights. Fidel doesn't own copyright over his own image, but he probably has some other rights over it. He'd have
I'm a big believer in creating as much as you can yourself because then it's all yours - no one can bug you about anything that you do. Sure there are times to make use of fair use, but I've always thought that you can be poignant and satirical even in a project that you create 100% from
True. Laws do change, but copyright laws seem to be changing in favor of
the
copyright holders, due most likely to powerful media lobbies that are
recognizing how technology is making pirating simple. Look at what's
going
on with DRM. There's a lot of money at stake.
yep. you help show
On Sep 22, 2005, at 2:23 PM, David Yirchott wrote:
If you don't wanna do the time, don't do
the crime.
I'm sorry that line is a trademark of Universal Studios.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and
Fair Use is a broad guideline open to interpretation. If you don't
have
legal representation that can beat a team of lawyers for a major media
conglomerate, I would definitely advise thinking twice before using
any
copyrighted material.
I agree that that is a fair assessment of the
From: Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other end of
that is that the strong protections are also there to defend our economy.
When they make sense. And they are also softened in various cases to
encourage growth. It doesn't seem to me that strong protections are
doing the music
From: Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't wanna do the time, don't do
the crime.
I'm sorry that line is a trademark of Universal Studios.
D'oh!
(oh, crap! Now FOX is after me too!)
-David
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games
FWIW, I do agree with current copyright law, at least to the extent that if
someone creates something they should own it and decide what is done with
it.
and in this discussion, i will take the side against present copyright law.
it's like following the laws of the Old testament.
they were
Would Fidel have a case?
http://canf.org/es/chistes/FUNNY-AS-HELL-Strohs-NEED-SPEAKERS.mpeg
A case of Strohs? :)
That's pretty funny, I hadn't seen it before.
Again, I am not a lawyer, but I would hazard a yes. I could not imagine
dubbing over Brittney Spears' voice to have her unintentionally
in this discussion, i will take the side against present copyright law.
it's like following the laws of the Old testament.
they were written for a different time in human consciousness.
brothers and sisters. I bring you the New testament.
these are just laws. they can be rewritten as we change.
14 matches
Mail list logo
