And my apologies for missing the 'k' reading too fast.
It's a consistent fault.
So, nevermind. I'm sorry. $10,000 would buy hotdogs for me and my whole
neighborhood.
Well, not really.
I don't pay entry fees for contests. Ever. It was the entry fee thing got my
ire up. Dang. Hmmm.
Another
This is the context from which you should have started with us, Chris.
On 12/16/06, [chrisbrogan.com] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got this hilarious bunch of emails from David at Mommy.tv (a really
great show- and if you've seen The Clip Show, Jim Kirks called me
out!). It TOTALLY seems to
Two quick points-
We don't embed. We have a thumbnail that points to your feed. There's
nothing copied and stored in our system but the data of the RSS (no
rich file).
We only got the request formally to take down the show of the person
who complained moments ago. I wasn't going to take it
Hi Steve-
Specific to Blip, I'd say yes without a doubt that we're friends.
We've spent time with Mike and Dina, and have had them speak at our
events. Mike and Dina (and Charles and the team) supported PodCamp
Boston, my first free unconference. We have a relationship.
We have friends and
Amanda Congdon wrote:
Chuck, I am personally offended by that comment. Lady cats everywhere
should be outraged. My cat, Mattie,
Yadda, yadda, yadda...
Hey, isn't it about time that the Andrew and Amanda camps just declared
a score draw and applaud each other as they leave the field?
I'll also vouch for the simplicity of MP4CamToAVI. I use it with my Xacti on
Windows. SO, I do the MP4CamToAVI thing, then edit in Windows MovieMaker and
save as DV. Then I open it up in Quicktime Pro to turn the video into .mov
and the iTunes (can't remember the file extension thingie) formats.
Hi I tried to check out cstar.com but it appears it won't work with
firefox. OK, thanks and good luck, Ed.
On 12/15/06, fsinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working on this movie download service since July and it
launched today:
http://www.cstar.com
ClickStar is trying
Wow. Not only does it not support Firefox, it doesnt support OSX.
Welcome to ClickStar! We are checking your system to verify that you
have the minimum requirements necessary to use the ClickStar service.
Incompatible Operating System
Intereesting, on OSX here in the UK I always get redirected to the
clickstarinc site which just goes on about the corporate side, no
actual videos. So is this site blocked from working outside the USA?
From everything Ive read this site is so far another tragic case of
some big players not really
video conference in five minutes
proposed topics: hosting Terms of Service, vlogging in Malaysia
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/8d7c39-6763
On Dec 15, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Markus Sandy wrote:
great topic idea
maybe some of the blip folks can join us
i think JD Lasica has an
Well I think fireant did get there before apple, before itunes had
podcast/video podcast support, but at the time there was no video ipod
so it didnt look like such a glaring ommision on Apples part.
Here in the UK the Zune is not available. I wonder whether Microsoft
will launch it
Cheers for the reply. The blip.tv folks are a shining example of
people who listen very careful to feedback, so if there are any
contentious issues about exactly hw your service woks, I highly
recommend speaking to them to get another angle on things. blip.tv ask
uploads to specify a license for
Sorry, Gary, attacks require rebuttal. I've been minding my own business. Wish
Mr. Baron
could do the same. He's long talked about leaving it up to the lawyers instead
of the
media, but now (since that hasn't worked in his favor), has decided to go the
public route.
Hope this ends it.
On the subject of sony.
Sony lacks any vision.
Their idea of a media player is something that plays their movies or
their music... like the completely proprietary PSP movie format, like
the completely proprietary minidisc, like the completely proprietary
a-trac format. The only reason they've
hello Nox,
it could be that i am just suspicious by nature but this is my
critique based on a first impression of the site:
I think the pay to submit model is a bad one because it gives the
appearance that the money given out is directly related to the
submission fee. that is not
For the record sull, those feeds came in from blip, vimeo, vsocial, etc.
via our ping service. The other end (blip, vsocial) had to send us the
data...more like being fed than sucking ;) It is an old service that
isn't in action anymore.
And yes, some of them are a pain now and that's an
Oh boy, digging a deeper hole for yourself.
ABC News is exactly the people we were in deep talks with. ABC NEws
and ABC Family. Its all under Dinsey and we were in project talks
with all. You have just lied again, mark my words here. I will
release the document to my blog then.
The AAA
Call up ABC. We were working on shows for ABC Family that I was never
intended to host. Isn't that right? Anyone at ABC will attest to that.
They were trying to to figure out what department to put us in and
that's where we landed. ABC Family.
Ari, my agent at Endeavor, turned HBO onto me. HBO
The deal I was trying to secure was for $250,000
You landed the deal for $0.
Nice one.
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Amanda Congdon wrote:
As far as AAA goes, just another example of you failing to secure
sponsorship. No contract, no deal. Unless there was a contract that
you hid from me?
Yup. You are right on that one. I wasn't doing it for the money.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The deal I was trying to secure was for $250,000
You landed the deal for $0.
Nice one.
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Amanda Congdon
As you can see, I spent legal fees on the HBO opportunity that was
meant for Rocketboom but yea, as I said, you stole it away for yourself.
Lie #2. Resolved.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: June 2, 2006 2:20:46 PM EDT
To: Thompson, Bryan [EMAIL
This proves what? That I (not you) had an HBO meeting and that I fired
my manager?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see, I spent legal fees on the HBO opportunity that was
meant for Rocketboom but yea, as I said, you stole it
The best way to avoid factual statements is to ask questions.
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Amanda Congdon wrote:
This proves what? That I (not you) had an HBO meeting and that I fired
my manager?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you
Guys, this isn't helping either of you. My strong advice as a businesswoman
and (I hope) friend is DO NOT discuss this stuff here OR on your blogs. If I
were a potential sponsor watching all this, I'd be extremely uncomfortable
about the sensitive details getting batted around.
And that is the
I agree completely Deirdre. Where are the moderators?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, this isn't helping either of you. My strong advice as a
businesswoman
and (I hope) friend is DO NOT discuss this stuff here OR on your
blogs. If I
were
On Dec 16, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
Moderators, where are you?
this one is sitting back watching this tread with great amusement.
thanks for the entertainment.
in particular, i really liked the hugs video loiez shared. that was
the highlight.
i really haven't had time
I agree. This isn't impressing me in the least about either party.
I don't really care anymore. You both are polluting this group and it needs
to stop, and stop now.
Take it onto your blogs where, if we care, we can read your slings at each
other.
Robert
_
From:
C'mon guys! If you can't help it, at least don't hurt it. Is it really
worth it burn all these bridges? There's plenty to go around. There's
money to be made. Not only vloggers with good intent read these
messeges but industry types. Be well, another day another dollar. Take
one of them chill
Indeed. All Ive learnt from this is that if I were moving and shaking,
wheeling and dealing in the new or old media world, I wouldnt touch
either of these characters with a bargepole.
Also I am not a lawyer so Im not entirely sure if its relevent, but in
the light of recent emails disclosed, can
I guess it has entertainment value for some, but they're hurting themselves
more than each other.
You know how in movies you see someone doing something really stupid and
wrong and you know they're going to get caught, or hurt, or killed? Like
when Susan is doing the nth stupid thing in Desperate
Girls! Girls! You're ALL pretty!
On 12/16/06, Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ryanne,
I think considering Andrew's onslaught of attacks have been unprovoked and
unsubstantiated, it might not be a bad idea to ban him. All I have ever
done is defend
myself.
--- In
Meanwhile, Amanda marches on. She's on CNN's
program The Future right now. And she's doing well.
Of course, this means I'm blogging rather than
working out and holiday shopping...
Zennie
--- Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess it has entertainment value for some, but
Dang, so much for my attempt to distract away from the tears and
tantrums episode.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 20:07, Zenophon Abraham wrote:
Meanwhile, Amanda marches on. She's on CNN's
program The Future right now. And she's doing well.
Of course, this means I'm blogging rather than
Hi DC Media Makers!
We're having a project-review meeting this Tuesday. If you'd like to
present a project you are working on and get a little feedback please
stop by. If you just want to attend and soak up the exciting DC
Media makers vibe and give feeback on projects, that's good too. If ya
here's an unbroken link
*http://tinyurl.com/tbc97*
congrats paul! that's so cool!
On 12/16/06, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Since the interview I have had very little response, but now here
comes the BBC feature page on me...
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im finished.
Ive said everything I wanted to say to defend myself from Amanda.
EOF
I would like to explain my method and thank you for providing a forum
in which to help.
I did not find this back-n-forth harmful, inappropriate or out of the
ordinary.
For me this is a
Paul Knight wrote:
Hi guys,
Since the interview I have had very little response, but now here
comes the BBC feature page on me...
Congrats Paul! Just read the page on the BBC site and found out you're
the head of the UK Video Blogging internet community. Darn and no one
even told me
Amanda Congdon wrote:
I agree completely Deirdre. Where are the moderators?
Amanda,
The mods are working behind the scenes. I've been contacted off list and
asked not to post on the thread. I assume others have too.
--
Cheers,
Gary
http://www.garyshort.org/
Yes Gary,
I set up the Ukvideobloggers group at yahoo back in February, thanks
for joining.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 21:27, Gary Short wrote:
Paul Knight wrote:
Hi guys,
Since the interview I have had very little response, but now here
comes the BBC feature page on me...
Drew,
You da man, as far as I concerned.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 21:15, andrew michael baron wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im finished.
Ive said everything I wanted to say to defend myself from Amanda.
EOF
I would like to explain my method and thank you for providing a forum
in which to
BBC!? You da man!
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Paul Knight wrote:
Drew,
You da man, as far as I concerned.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 21:15, andrew michael baron wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen, Im finished.
Ive said everything I wanted to say to defend myself from Amanda.
EOF
I
Find your path, and share the joy! The People Of The
United Methodist Church.
--- Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dang, so much for my attempt to distract away from
the tears and
tantrums episode.
Paul
On 16 Dec 2006, at 20:07, Zenophon Abraham wrote:
Meanwhile, Amanda
Hey guys I am looking for singers in my latest colab, we are singing
o come all ye faithfull as a christmas vlog, I will be singing in
both english and latin, Loiez's son and Loiez will be singing in
French, Rachel my wife will be singing in german, more languages
would be fun. contact me
The key will be c
All instruments are welcome
Loiez
Le 16 déc. 06 à 23:19, Paul Knight a écrit :
Hey guys I am looking for singers in my latest colab, we are singing
o come all ye faithfull as a christmas vlog, I will be singing in
both english and latin, Loiez's son and Loiez will be
Congratulations Paul!
That is really great!
I saw in your vlog that you went to the BBC. I linked the episode.
Seriously, that is very impressive. Way to go!
Greg
gregsvideoblog.blogspot.com http://gregsvideoblog.blogspot.com
cruzonby.com http://cruzonby.com
eighteenhundred.blogspot.com
Hey all -
In my pursuit of edumakating my senior engineering students at Cooper
Union (http://www.cooper.edu) , I am developing a Web 2.0 class -
focusing on the topics that are beginning to pervade the
consciousness of the marketplace today.
As an enthusiastic endorser of podcasting and
**bull$hit!!!***
I cry **bull$hit!!**
Moderators? For what? To tell y'all to can it? How about taking it
offlist someplace? There's a whole internet world out there where you
can fling poop at each other 24/7! Personally, I'm finding this
thread interesting as hell (not entertaining,
AHA!!! There it is! That's it! I've been waiting for one of you two
crazy kids to post something that would shove me over the edge and
make me choose a side!
Holy Vicious, Batman.
End scene.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think considering
Hi,
We have created a group in France
PlanetAgency
( 15 of the best explorers of the web2.0 in all domains)
We have a webtv here
http://planetagency.xi-vlog.com/
It's in french but
If you want to participe write me off list please
Best regards
Loiez
Le 17 déc. 06 à 01:21, Sanford Dickert a
I haven't been. I keep telling folks that, even if we've started to
presume (most) everyone has broadband, it's still going to be a while
before HD content on the Net is encoded and presented that way.
Am I wrong? And what are you telling people, now that HD cameras are
out there in numbers, and
The spirit of the season is clearly alive and well in the
vlogosphere
At least it is with Arnold Schwarzenegger. He wishes everyone a Happy
Hanukkah...
http://www.arnoldspeaks.com/2006/12/id-like-to-have-word-with-hanukkah.h\
tml
I'm only using HD camcorders. Why?
For one, the image I get is much higher quality overall. My $4,000 Sony can
shoot in low light, has better image stableization than the $700 Panasonic
cameras I used at Microsoft, and I like the widescreen format better. The
images are also better sharpness
Id say it depends on their budget, how long they are expecting to go
before buying another camera, and what sort of content they make.
Im sure that SD and the current below-SD 320x240 type resolutions that
vlogging often uses will be around for a long time. For all the
poo-pooing of video on the
Due to the success of MySpace, YouTube, et. al..the Person of the year is
YOU. Meaning,
the blogger and the vlogger and those who create content.
I'm pretty sure that what we do matters..no matter what we do.
http://tinyurl.com/yf54ud
Tony Katz
http://www.talkshowonthego.com
Sanford:
Check out what Chris Heuer is doing with the Social Media club (next meeting
is in late Jan).
http://socialmediaclub.com/
Also you can run your class by the O'Reilly definitions of web2.0 (yeah
yeah, he makes money off the definition with conferences and stuff but a lot
the ideas around
very cool
crash test kitchen is featured...
congratulations...
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570724,00.html
http://tinyurl.com/vjd6v
To watch Warren Murray, 34, and Leanne White, 32, make sponge cake is
to hear the silent screams of Julia Child's dear, departed spirit.
We switched completely to HD last year (we were doing short docs,
application videos, stuff for fashion companies and AOL - lots of
requirements and the clients cared less about format and more about
results). We were also doing a lot of greenscreen work, and doing it on HD
worked out really well
Of course the flip side to this is, It's The Age of Narcissism
http://static.flickr.com/135/324471483_bb19d1f840.jpg . It's all about
me, me, me.
Tom Gosse, aka Irish Hermit
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blog/vlog: http://irishhermit.blogspot.com
_
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
What I'm saying was probably said already but here it goes: personally
created content reminds big mainstream media who the boss is- the
individual. By creating our own we tell the corporations we aren't
lulled by mass media.
Francisco
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL
I always wanted the cover of Time.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, tony.katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the success of MySpace, YouTube, et. al..the Person of the
year is YOU. Meaning,
the blogger and the vlogger and those who create content.
I'm pretty sure that what we
Wow, congratulations Paul! Now I'll have to pay $6.95 a video to download
your site from the PJKProductions PRO-site. ;) Because you'll be so big that
no website will be able to hold the bandwidth.
P.S. I'm not trying to be sarcastic. I'm just saying I think Paul Knight is
worth $6.95 because
I tend to agree with much of what Robert says here. Even if you don't post
video online
now in HD it is great to have the HD masters you can always go back to. I'm a
little
dubious about internet distro of HD content in the short term. Even with
broadband
penetration as broad as it is now,
All really good points. Well, okay. Maybe I'll switch to HD in 2007.
My personal production is for small screen only, so I'm not really
thinking much about it, but if I'm doing field work FOR someone else,
I should have a decent rig for them.
Robert- you're NOT the Discovery Channel? I discover
i think it's awesome that TIME focused on these people (um, us)
but wouldn't it be great if they linked to all the bloggers
in the online version?
LINKS, people, LINKS.
it's what makes the internet great...it's what makes the internet, the
internet.
On 12/16/06, Teri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the xacti HD is pretty kick ass
compared to the regular ones.
(jay just got one for xmas from yours truly)
but obviously you don't upload the HD version
because it would be way too big.
the reason to use it is for overall better quality footage
that will then be shrunk down.
jay shoots a lot of
65 matches
Mail list logo
