Re: [videoblogging] Re: when posting a podcast wich format should I use?

Den 14.04.2007 kl. 19:06 skrev caroosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the quicktime > wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something. No. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: SOCAN Seeks $60 Annual Podcaster Fee

nd. I use his music in a > video I put on the Internet. Do I have to pay SOCAN? Depends on whether your friend is a SOCAN member or not. If the Canadian system is anything like the Danish system your friend will be a SOCAN member if he is even remotely serious about his music. -- And

Re: [videoblogging] Scripting News: 4/18/2007

er.com/twittervlog/ > > > On 19 Apr 2007, at 13:09, Steve Garfield wrote: > > Dave Winer wrote this post: > > "Vlogging comes to mass murder > > The Virginia Tech shooter sent a package of video and pictures to NBC. > > In other words, vlogging comes to mass mu

Re: [videoblogging] Scripting News: 4/18/2007

r no one I know)." > > http://scripting.com/ > > Share your thoughts with him. > > I did. > > --Steve > -- > Steve Garfield > http://SteveGarfield.com > > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Scripting News: 4/18/2007

t;>> >>>>> Bullshit Bullshit BULLSHIT tech piece, trying to find a tech >> angle >>>>> that didn't need to be found. Maybe in order to justify writing >>>>> about it on a tech blog. >>>>> >>>>> Wow, Dave, I

Re: [videoblogging] Re: itunes censorship?

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:51:26 -0400, andrew michael baron wrote > What tools are avil. to create your own XML templates? The database structure for all blogging systems are different, so without Yet Another Piece of Software to store all your entries in I doubt you'll find a catch-all script

Re: [videoblogging] Re: rel="payment"

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:07:06 -0700, Stephanie Bryant wrote > Can a feed owner change how mefeedia displays the payment link? For > instance, can we get it to say "tip jar"? Because I love that analogy > (or the "hat on the sidewalk" one) and think it's the best way to > present such a link to

Re: [videoblogging] Re: itunes censorship?

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:20:50 -, Mark Cyr wrote > As the big guys like Apple and Yahoo keep adding to the XML media > extensions in feeds, we need a service like feedburner that can > quickly make sense of this.  We certainly wouldn't want everyone > trying to do this on their own. A se

Re: [videoblogging] Re: itunes censorship?

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:27:24 -, Mark Cyr wrote > Feedburner tests each link at the time of burning the feed, and if > they can not verify the link is good, they default the enclosure to > a mime type of txt/html. Are you sure of this? Or did you mean text/html (huge difference, since on

Re: [videoblogging] Vlogs As Art

(Video)blogs are a medium and as such they are no more art than tv, radio, books or any other medium. It's a blank canvas (to stay in the art metaphor), you can use it both for art and for non-art. Just as a sketch book can be used to create Picasso as well as a tax return. - Andreas --

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Apple TV and iPod clash

lexity" - in a nutshell, anything >> > upwards of >> > > > > > > 320x240 gets low- >> > > > > > > > complexity. Gory details here: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2007/tn2188.html >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Three possible workarounds. I am not in front of QTPro > right >> > > > now so >> > > > > > > will try later: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1) Use the Export for iPod option with the source vid >> sized at >> > > > > > > 640x480 - this will goad >> > > > > > > > QTPro into using low-complexity - and then find some way >> > of saving >> > > > > > > the resulting video >> > > > > > > > _again_ with a chopped-down bitrate, perhaps by doing a >> > "Save as >> > > > > > > ..." but without re- >> > > > > > > > encoding. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2) Do it the other way round - export at the bitrate etc. >> > that you >> > > > > > > want, then run it through >> > > > > > > > the iPod export. The developer spec suggests QT iPod >> exporter >> > > > using >> > > > > > > a 640x480 source >> > > > > > > > file will pick its own bitrate according to a complex >> formula >> > > > ("DR = >> > > > > > > { (nMC * 8 ) / 3 } - 100" >> > > > > > > > I kid you not, check out the developer link above) between >> > 700 and >> > > > > > > 1500kbps. But maybe >> > > > > > > > if the source file is already lower, it won't jump up the >> > bitrate >> > > > > > > too shockingly. The MC in >> > > > > > > > the equation stands for "macroblock" and if the number of >> > > > these can >> > > > > > > be reduced in the >> > > > > > > > source file (how? Dunno) then, doing the maths, you are >> headed >> > > > for a >> > > > > > > smaller result. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 3) Resize your source video to 640x480, whack it through >> > > > Export for >> > > > > > > iPod and hope the >> > > > > > > > filesize is not too bloated. As in the formula above, this >> > should >> > > > > > > produce something >> > > > > > > > between 700kbps and 1500kbps, although Apple doesn't say >> > > > whether the >> > > > > > > audio is >> > > > > > > > included in that bitrate (AAARGH!). >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I found to my horror this afternoon that my carefully >> crafted >> > > > > > > 640x480 recipe with >> > > > > > > > meticulously pared down video and sound bitrates that >> > delivered a >> > > > > > > file of 5MB/minute that >> > > > > > > > looks alright on the telly via laptop S-Video cable > doesn't >> > > > work on >> > > > > > > the iPod. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I am just about ready to tell Apple where to shove > their TV >> > > > box ... >> > > > > > > and all of the above still >> > > > > > > > leaves the question unanswered: will the aforementioned >> oblong >> > > > > > > suppository PLAY H.264 >> > > > > > > > BASELINE LOW-COMPLEXITY??? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Anyone got one of these boxes? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's all for now. I know none of the above is tested > but I >> > > > thought >> > > > > > > I'd post now while my >> > > > > > > > blood is up, and to give others the chance to look for a >> > solution. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Waz from Crash Test Kitchen >> > > > > > > > http://www.crashtestkitchen.com >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: -Spampost.com-Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2007

> dominated by a few Cool Kids -- but still it's Jay, people! +1 Not that I'm likely to be able to go if it's going to be before September 1st. DC is significantly cheaper to fly to than anywhere further west (except Chicago)... and there are direct flights from Copenhage

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2007

hagen) to Vancouver is *four* times as expensive as a ticket on the same dates to DC. How many out-of-continent people are likely to drop over 3000 USD for a plane ticket? Not me. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2007

vloggercon which makes everything easier. Have you seen the view from Joel's place? http://joelart.blogspot.com/2006/07/beginning-node-101-heidelberg-watch.html > Damn beautiful (and there's a real castle, beat that Washington DC). I can't wait. :o) - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] is this an interlacing problem?

Isn't that akin to > expecting Windows Media Player to play MOV files? Quicktime is the default media player on a Mac (also for AVI files). I'm guessing Waz is using a Mac. Not that you can't setup Quicktime as a handler for AVI on Windows, there's just little use for it. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2007

end, not the journalists who may or may not write about it afterwards. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2007

k, Wreck & Salvage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What is the closest/cheapest major airport to Heidelberg? > > On 4/26/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Den 26.04.2007 kl. 15:12 skrev Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >&

Re: [videoblogging] Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

in Unforgiven. Old, bitter and generally unwilling until someone shoots your best friend dead and puts his body on display on Main Street. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

in many cases today. However, for niche groups it makes little sense to rely on mainstream sources for tracking language use - *especially* since the members of the niche group publish so many words (spoken and written). That's why Wikipedia-nazis who blindly follow policy without thin

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

ably Smart on a given topic (including but not limited to those with academic careers). Those blogs provide much better citations than a wire story written by the intern... as any good encyclopedia editor would know. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

See http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20061028-2354/ > ). -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Blog Wikipedia Entry

derstand trying to work with someone, trying to teach, but this > just seems crazy..maybe it's just me Videoblogging is not a prerequisite for talking, caring and having knowledge about videoblogging. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Put up or shut up

have never >> > contributed to an article. So it'll be new to me. >> > >> > Patrick, I'm going to take you at your word that you're working in >> good >> > faith. >> > let's start building. >> > there are so many mainstrea

Re: [videoblogging] Youtube Partner Program

o see one ad cent for our videos - personal or not - and those are the videos that will change the world". ...and now back to your regular programming. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

[videoblogging] Check out Bonny & Clyde (Richard BF's new project)

it's here. Watch, laugh, learn. Some day it will save the world. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Is there a listings for pixelodeon?

. we just need an > agreed upon tag. :-) KISS: pixelodeon :o) I don't need a reason either, but like Trine I don't have the cash. But hey, I live through Rupert's videos these days anyway! -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Is there a listings for pixelodeon?

ok says we couldn't include all our favourites because there are many other concerns. Den 25.05.2007 kl. 22:07 skrev David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > yes Amen to KISS ... but what about the year? 07 vs the potential 08? > :-) > > pixelodeon07 > > > ?? > > -

Re: [videoblogging] Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

when you sent your invoice. As Tim points out in the comments PodTech needs permission for Casey as well (this isn't a news story, but regular advertising). -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

especially really noisy bloggers in a tight community. And the > money involved is minuscule compared to what they have. > > The lack of communication is a real problem. > podtech needs to join the conversation. > > Jay > > -- > Here I am > http://jaydedman.com >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

an > invoice for a couple hundred bucks and yet another to send them one > for $38gabillion. > > I assume it was for a reasonable amount, but it helps make a level > headed decision on what the outcome should be. Lan is a professional photographer, I think you can safely assume

Re: [videoblogging] Re: How much money to videoblog full-time?

pinion that every time a videoblogger charges less than the > rate card, they screw things up for people in AFTRA. Yes, please support your labour unions. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging Influences

> _______ > Brook Hinton > film/video/audio art > www.brookhinton.com < > TRACE GARDEN now available in flash format on Blip! > tracegarden.blip.tv > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hey PodTech - What's up with Lan's image?

doesn't even make sense from a financial standpoint. You have already spent more money in man-hours trying to weasel yourself out of this situation (and it ain't working, yo). - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

gt; > > mail. >> > > >> > > Because music is a matter of shifting consciousness and not worldly >> > sound, a >> > > > person can't claim to own or control music any more than they can >> > claim to >> > > > own or control a quadrant of mist over a lake. >> > > >> > > >> > > PS. Here is a free album of amazing midi-synthesizer and home-made >> > > electronic instrument music by the author of that essay: >> > > http://www.geartekcorporation.com/slowdudes/slowdudes.html >> > > >> > > And some free lo-fi music by me: >> > > http://standards.bullemhead.com/ >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Adam Quirk >> > > Wreck & Salvage >> > > 551.208.4644 >> > > Brooklyn, NY >> > > http://wreckandsalvage.com >> > > >> > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Adam Quirk >> Wreck & Salvage >> 551.208.4644 >> Brooklyn, NY >> http://wreckandsalvage.com >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

; --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Interesting. >> >> So, all musicians or bands covering a tune must get permission first >> or pay fees? Does that include if they cover a song in an encore

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The History of What My Dog Can't Hear

__________ > > > On 7/3/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> There are standard licensing agreements for this kind of stuff and no >> permission is needed as long as you pay. In the case of music being >> covered

Re: [videoblogging] Re: How much money to videoblog full-time?

income. As they say in the US: That dog don't hunt. My (video)blog is an expense to me (time and money) and yet it's very valuable to me. In fact I believe I make a much larger "profit" on it because I don't have to think about it making me any money. - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Anyone Going to YouTube NYC 777?

t http://vloggercue.blogspot.com/ Add your name if you're coming: http://vloggercue.pbwiki.com/whosComing I'm going - this counts as my summer vacation - and I'm all for the hugs and the barbecue and the videos on the big screen and the love and the barbecue. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] FLV Encoding...

/www.apple.com/quicktime > with Perian, if that >> > doesn't encode to FLV add Flip4Mac I think might do it. >> > -- >> > cheers >> > Adrian Miles >> > this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] >> > vogmae.net.au >> > [official compliance stuff:] CRICOS provider code: 00122A >> > >> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Josh Wolf Is Running for Mayor of San Francisco

with the ethics office >> > tomorrow and will begin raising the signatures and funds needed for my >> > campaign. More to come soon, but for now, I leave you with a rough >> > draft of my platform as mayor of the city and county of San >> Francisco." >> > >> > >> > via chris ritke (thanks!) >> > >> > -- >> > http://tools.ourmedia.org/blog >> > http://SpinXpress.com/Markus_Sandy >> > http://Ourmedia.org/Markus_Sandy >> > >> >> >> > > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] H.264 and Adobe help?

#x27;re at a critical stage in video becomeing popular. It's too bad > there's no standard, I'm afraid Flash is the closest we have to one. > (Opinions solicited) h.264 is a codec, Flash is a container format. The two cannot be compared. You can have an h.264 Flash video for example. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] H.264 and Adobe help?

; same price as other losers that are first time buyers. I have to be perfectly blunt with you: Get over it. It's $30 each time and it's not like they release a new version very often. You pay to upgrade every other piece of commercial software also. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Sane Release form

read. Example: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] mp4 junk on Safari?

books? > Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search > http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/ >

Re: [videoblogging] Vlog Europe 2007...Will you be watching and participating?

we'd love it if you'd join us. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Jeffrey >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> best regards, >> Deirdré Straughan >> >> living & travelling in Italy >> (and other Countries Beginning with I) >> www.beginningwithi.com >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons and Virgin being sued for photo use

nyurl.com/2adx67 > > Flickr Central discussion > http://tinyurl.com/2ue9fw > > Rupert > http://twittervlog.tv/ > http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/ > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Creative Commons and Virgin being sued for photo use

l work illegal or impossible to perform). >> >> This is different, however, than formal interview situations, in > which case >> releases are indeed prudent, regardless or their legal necessity. >> >> Disclaimer: not a lawyer. >> >> Brook >> >> ___ >> Brook Hinton >> film/video/audio art >> www.brookhinton.com >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Patrick Power 1969-2007

work, what happened to > him, anything? > > I should also mention that the redirect from patrickpower.com includes a > donation button to help his family. > > > ___ > Brook Hinton > film/video/audio art > www.brookhinton

Re: [videoblogging] My New Video Project

ed my love for cute > animals in a whole new way (heck, I have been doing vlog-cats for about 2 > years now) > > So I would love to hear feedback from you, and if you have any > constructive > criticism, please send that also! > > Thanks so much! > > our new Hallowee

Re: [videoblogging] Re: "video blog", the term of choice

r >> do >> > > they necissarily need to. >> > > >> > > They may understand two things: 1) subscribing, 2) syndication (if >> > > they make media). >> > > >> > > RSS is undisputeably and undeniably integral to this space. As 1) >> a >> > > subscription mechanism, 2) a serch mechanism, and 3) a syndication >> > > mechanism even though the vast majority of the public may not >> know it >> > > or even need to know it. >> > > >> > > What interests me though, is how far have we come in loosening >> media >> > > from the confines of the "web page" so it may flow freely beyond >> the >> > > boundries of the traditional web to set top boxes, portable >> devices, >> > > cell phones and such. >> > > >> > > How far have we really gotten in that big picture? >> > > >> > > What percentage of web originating video is viewed on a web page? >> > > >> > > What percentage is viewed on the web page it originated on, as >> opposed >> > > to through a syndication, reblog, or search site? >> > > >> > > Just some late night ramblings. >> > > >> > > -Mike >> > > mefeedia.com >> > > mmeiser.com/blog >> > > evilvlog.com >> > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gary Leland >> > >> > www.PodcastPickle.com >> > www.PickleReviews.com >> > www.PickleMobile.com >> > www.PodcasterTree.com >> > www.PodcastJunk.com >> > www.PodcastInspector.com >> > www.DillDomains.com >> > www.MySalesAccount.com >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > >> >> >> > > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Need to decide on a format

te it's CC BY-NC-SA, not LGPL. This kind of stuff is important to get sorted out. It needs to be very clear what parts are covered by which license. Especially considering projects like Show in a Box which states that "everything here is open source" (when it's clearly n

Re: [videoblogging] QuickTime Embeds on iPhone

/itunes >> >> MY BLOG: http://1timstreet.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: thesis on 'vidgets'

five minute look at the paper and could not figure out what > Vidgets are. So, are there any links to these amazing Vidgets, that > demonstrate what Vidgets are all about? > > John > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interactive Video

ttp://www.ezedia.com/products/eZediaQTI/ - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] New Videoblogger

format. > example of vPIP here: http://current.com/producerResources.htm > > Jay > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] video gallery wordpress plugin?

Den 03.01.2008 kl. 15:12 skrev Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The "Journal" format is becoming less and less useful. Why? -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: How we got here

pretty much > all the software you need to vlog? > > Chris > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Rox Lumiere for Rupert

> I finally made one today, and I want to thank you publicly, Rupert, (and > Andreas too) for illuminating me about this art form. > > http://www.beachwalks.tv/2008/01/11/beach-walk-567-first-lumiere-for-rupert/ > > Love, > > Rox -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Rox Lumiere for Rupert

skrev Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > >> I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they >> don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I guess), but >> i

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

nnamed Japanese Art Collective? > > Bah > > Steve Elbows > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> That was a mention. A discussion takes more than me mentioning it in >> h

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

t it as one possible reason lumiere video isn't getting > a lot of discussion in the group. You manage to suck all the fun out > of making them. > > If I've learned anything in the past 30 days, it's that I can't insult > you, Brittany or anyone else. No one can

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

ngs you stated, but I > would have liked to know that before now, and would have liked the > opportunity to remove my link if I did not agree. That simple > courtesty would have been nice. > > Heath > http://batmangeek.com > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas

Re: [videoblogging] some experimental templates

in > RSS feeds all that is delivered is the QT movie which, once on the > client computer or device (eg iPod) can no longer find the XML file, > and so cannot find or load the media it requires. > > Adrian Miles > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > bachelor communication honours coordinator > vogmae.net.au > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re:some experimental templates

ing then it's got to the end. >> >> there would be a pause as the next clip was loaded (due to all the >> usual network issues), but no doubt there's some clever preload thing >> you might be able to do to hide this pause. >> >> short answer is that the only way i know to do this is via livestage >> pro, and the status of that quite expensive software is very grey at >> the moment. But QT can do it quite easily as a technology, just >> getting under the hood is the problem >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

> > On 16/01/2008, at 12:59 AM, Heath wrote: >> > >> > > But Andreas has stated, that in addition to linking to a video > if >> > > someone emails him, that if he or Brittany come accross a > Lumiere >> > > they will then also link to it...But what if the person doesn't > want >> > > to be linked to because they don't believe in this manifesto? > Look, >> > > I know the web is a great big link fest, but in cases like > this, I >> > > think it bears pondering that practice. Cheryl has already > stated >> > > that she will no longer make Lumiere's because she doesn't want > to be >> > > associated with the manifesto, I find that troubling. How many >> > > others feel that way? If Andreas were giving people the choice > to be >> > > associated with the site he has, I wouldn't feel the way I do, > but he >> > > doesn't always do that, and that is where my concern lies. >> > >> > Adrian Miles >> > adrian.miles@ >> > bachelor communication honours coordinator >> > vogmae.net.au >> > >> > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

s community who are asking that their creative works not > be displayed in the context of the manifesto (rather than forcing > their "participation" in something they don't feel their creative > works are in line with) > > Its just wrong - we never would have accepted that 'solution' from > anyone else. > > I'm really quite shocked at how its all being handled. > > - Dave > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] some experimental templates

ly, think they all should be available as triptychs too.) > On 17/01/2008, at 1:08 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > >> Will you be adding the templates for rhizome 5 and 6? (I was looking >> for >> number 5 specifically yesterday when I found out that eZedia won

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

me to be into that sort > of thing, if I want to make such vids in future I will probably just do > it without giving them > a name or trying to get others to make them to, but thats just me. > > Cheers > > Steve Elbows > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "An

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

AIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 17, 2008 1:07 PM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any speculation on whether or not the link would be removed would be >> just >> that, speculation. Please don't start making up issues that are not >>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Rox Lumiere for Rupert

/blandlands.com/ -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: VlogEurope 2008 date and time suggestion

ke that I'd leave at least 24 hours in the connecting city (and then you have to pay for a hotel meaning your costs would end up around the same). Budapest is beautiful. This is an excellent excuse to go back. Another good excuse is the goulash. Mmmm. - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: VlogEurope 2008 date and time suggestion

line and I can see they're a part of the Oneworld alliance along with American Airlines and British Airways. If you have no affiliation with other alliances I'd start by searching for deals through those airlines. - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Plugin for Video Comments

oogroups.com , >> "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Can we use use each others video, like we currently use each other's >> > text posts to have a conversation? >> >> >> > > > -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] Does the file size of video matter anymore?

at > changing at all? I mean with the push towards HD, with being able to > view content on the TV, etc, it just seems like its all a part of the > evolution...or is it? > > I was just curious as to what you all thought. > > Heath > personal http://batmangeek.com

Re: [videoblogging] Conversation Tracking (was: Plugin for Video Comments)

gt; browser while at someones post that sends you to your blogs "write > post" page with the framework of the above syntax already completed. > Just plugin your url to your video and your thumbnail and presto. > (such plugin in of urls could be done in some whiz bang web2.0 way of > course) > > > - Dave -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] How a newspaper uses video

pers are better or worse because they are not bound by the regular one hour news broadcast (with commercial breaks) that is so typical for American local news? - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] How a newspaper uses video

as important as the story. My gut tells me the local newspapers stand a better chance than local tv. Newspapers seem to have gotten through the battle between journalism and advertising with more integrity intact. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] drupal + blip

> (i want to create a kind of community on this software basis). > > thanks a lot in. > cheers. -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] drupal + blip

andling in Drupal Core is also one of the priorities at the code sprint that will be going on the day after DrupalCon ends. I'll be there, I hope you'll be too: http://boston2008.drupalcon.org/codesprint - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] tagging posts in wordpress question

"tag-name" is a separate tag. You should file a bug in the Wordpress issue tracker. Since the Wordpress docs are hell to navigate I've found the link for you: http://codex.wordpress.org/Reporting_Bugs - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen http://www.solitude.dk/

Re: [videoblogging] YouthMinistryTV.co m » Happy Thanksgiving 2005

IANAL. The full legal code is at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode > (under "Restrictions"). Since they're not linking back (or showing in the video) the URI for your blog entry and/or your original video, they're not giving proper attribution. - Andreas On Fri, 25 Nov 2

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Covering Black Friday

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:34:43 +0100, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the concept of a general-strike long gone in the united states? Its > alive and well in many parts of Europe. I dont think the UK has had a > pproper general strike since the winter of discontent 1978-79. Our last

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Covering Black Friday

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:02:08 +0100, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's hear some more amazing Black Friday tails here you 1600 readers. First Meiser didn't want to "split hares" and now you want tails. What's up with you guys and animals? Anyway, I've been celebrating Buy Nothing Day tod

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WSJ article on downloadable TV

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:40:27 +0100, strollingbones2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the old days (and still today), the producers of various shows > want to partner with a network because the network have the broadcast > infrastructure. But in the emerging paradigm, if a producer can make > a pr

Re: [videoblogging] Spirit can not be spoken for

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:03:40 +0100, Randolfe Wicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think vlogging can be greatly impacted through directories. That is > why we as a community should work to set up an "open directory" that > will become the accepted norm. Otherwise, others will set up slant

Re: [videoblogging] Thumbnail archive with videos only?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:26:21 +0100, Devlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It brings up a good question...how many videobloggers use their blogs > to post text and video? (as in text is when no video is accompanying > the text) Me. :o) I really don't see why anyone should be limited to just posting

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Covering Black Friday

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:27:17 +0100, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday stay up all night drinking. > Thursday sleep all morning, then eat all afternoon > Thursday/Friday night stand in lines for hours > So that Friday morning you can crowd into a store with a huge mass of >

Re: [videoblogging] Question about plug adapters & UK Vloggers

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:37:10 +0100, Beth Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm traveling from the US to London in two weeks for the Gloval Voices > Summit and trying to get organize so I can live blog and vlog. What > type of adaptor do I need to charge up my batteries for my > laptop/camera

Re: [videoblogging] Question about plug adapters & UK Vloggers

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:22:22 +0100, Beth Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks! I looks like mine will work and I called the manufacturer just > to confirm it. Great. You just need a plug adaptor then. Those are dirt cheap. > Now, my question is - if you had one free day in London to vlo

Re: [videoblogging] Do you need Permission to VLOG People In Public? Release Forms? Stalking or Vlog

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:11:10 +0100, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here in the U.S. I've taken photos and video in airports, including > within the secure area. I did not see any signs or hear any > announcements that suggested I could not. (Of course a good sketch > artist with enough

Re: [videoblogging] Blogger templates SPECIFIALLY for bloggers

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:37:44 +0100, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Rocketboom's layout works because it is updated daily...not many >> people delve into their archives (i imagine) > > Definitely wrong. People check back into the recent archives because > of the thumbnails below. Th

Re: [videoblogging] Blogger templates SPECIFIALLY for bloggers

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:44:07 +0100, Fire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BUT, having said that, there is a reason why Grandma and Granpa don't > get online, and thats because > every interface is so daunting... and if your layout is different from > mine - we have a different interface... > thus, in

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Blogger templates SPECIFIALLY for bloggers

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:15:26 +0100, Amanda Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you try clicking "view 2" on the top of the archive page? We have > two different ways to view our archives, one with just the thumbnails > and another with story links included for searchability. Nope, I didn't

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:09:29 +0100, Aimee Buyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html I don't know whether I should laugh or cry. Barbie Too Hot For Internet Archive. - Andreas -- http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on

Re: [videoblogging] making a vlog soft

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:06:17 +0100, Will Luers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ezedia is really basic quicktime authoring software and it is free if > you limit the amount of > frames and objects per project. I have looked at Ezedia before, but backed away on the cost (cheaper than LiveStage,

Re: [videoblogging] making a vlog soft

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:55:47 +0100, Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > around the 29/11/05 Ted Tagami mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] > making a vlog soft that: >> I would like to add a link within my video. Can't you do this in QT Pro? > > yes, and no. > using QT pro you can add a te

Re: [videoblogging] "miraculous" says Adrien Brody

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:07:05 +0100, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not all videoblogs are vodcasts ;-) I agree...and not all vodcasts are videoblogs. ;-) - Andreas -- http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

Fair Use related to Copyright Law, not Trademark Law. - Andreas On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:49:35 +0100, Joan Khoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would think that it would be fair use. But Mattel seems lawsuit-happy > so I > wouldn't risk it. It really turned me off Barbies to read up on all those

Re: [videoblogging] pc equivalent to imovie?

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:38:03 +0100, shawnsninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been having trouble with avid and cant stand windows movie > maker, short of getting a mac, is there anything out there that I can > use that is similar to imovie? If you can't stand movie maker, you probably ca

Re: [videoblogging] VlogSafe Music

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:19:29 +0100, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > according to Webster, the definition of recitation includes that the > information is delivered publicly and *from memory* > > so those podcasters had better not be reading attributions from a script > or they are viol

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >