Den 28.06.2007 kl. 23:06 skrev Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > To infer all sorts of legal complications only confuses things, and > keeps PodTech in the one down position publicly speaking. I think your > point about the Vloggies being cash-negative might be relevant > internally but came across just plain silly to me here on this list.
Do you know what this is: Its the world's smallest violin playing just for PodTech. Loosing money on the Vloggies doesn't make PodTech into videoblog philanthropists. It just makes them really bad at budgetting. Want me to kiss you on the cheek and give you some milk and cookies? Oh, please. Regardless the amount of money you are throwing at other vloggers are totally irrelevant. You are still not paying Lan. He's trying to run a business, you like you. (so am I and I have never encountered behavious as insane as this) Unless PodTech is inferring Lan did not take the photograph in question (are you?) I fail to see what legal issues there could be. Be a man, PodTech. Just admit you fucked up and pay the man. If you had done this right away noone would have thought any less of you. It doesn't even make sense from a financial standpoint. You have already spent more money in man-hours trying to weasel yourself out of this situation (and it ain't working, yo). - Andreas -- Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
