True. Laws do change, but copyright laws seem to be changing in favor of
the
copyright holders, due most likely to powerful media lobbies that are
recognizing how technology is making pirating simple. Look at what's
going
on with DRM. There's a lot of money at stake.
yep. you help show
. And not
just propaganda stuff either like your piece. The threat of expensive
litigation has, I am sure, kept many from expressing themselves as they
might like.
On Sep 21, 2005, at 10:46 PM, David Yirchott wrote:
Creativity is helped when there is a return on investment. Also, if
you
From: Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other end of
that is that the strong protections are also there to defend our economy.
When they make sense. And they are also softened in various cases to
encourage growth. It doesn't seem to me that strong protections are
doing the music
From: Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't wanna do the time, don't do
the crime.
I'm sorry that line is a trademark of Universal Studios.
D'oh!
(oh, crap! Now FOX is after me too!)
-David
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games
Would Fidel have a case?
http://canf.org/es/chistes/FUNNY-AS-HELL-Strohs-NEED-SPEAKERS.mpeg
A case of Strohs? :)
That's pretty funny, I hadn't seen it before.
Again, I am not a lawyer, but I would hazard a yes. I could not imagine
dubbing over Brittney Spears' voice to have her unintentionally
in this discussion, i will take the side against present copyright law.
it's like following the laws of the Old testament.
they were written for a different time in human consciousness.
brothers and sisters. I bring you the New testament.
these are just laws. they can be rewritten as we change.
Charles,
I was rather hoping you'd respond to:
I'll come back to the specific case of blog after I've proven that
most definitions are fuzzy and prototypical.
Isn't that what this discussion is really about? The definition -- or lack
thereof -- of a blog. Why wait? If we are in
Cool!
Thanks, Kunga. I'll definitely look into this more after I get off work! And
thanks for the HD/HDV correction (I wasn't clear on the difference, but you
inspired me to Google it).
Looking forward to seeing your HDV-sourced examples,
-David
From: Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Many categories have fuzzy boundaries. Take mother. How can we
classify something as a mother?
Actually, a mother seems to me to be a female that has given birth and/or
has taken legal guardianship of a child. Of course there are breakdowns to
this as well: birth mother, adoptive mother,
Hmmm I am not sure that I'd agree that blog is defined
heuristically
-- and if that were so, perhaps now it does mean all websites. Though,
perhaps you could be more clear in what you mean (I think either you
have
the wrong word or I have the wrong definition). To me heuristically is
like
website with periodically posted news
stories and an RSS feed?
4) How often is periodic? If someone fails to update their blog in two
weeks, does it stop being a blog?
David Yirchott wrote:
If there is a useful list of blog characteristics, shouldn't that equal
a
clearcut blogness test?
Can
As a General rule, .com is the best. No question. It is the default and much
more memorable.
That's not to say people aren't successful with .org .net .info etcetera.
You just have to be prepared that most people you tell your URI to are
likely going to visit the .com first.
Between a
I was just asking about this HDR-HC1 on the last videoconference. Has anyone
had any good/bad experiences with it?
Supposedly in September the prosumer HVR-A1U is coming out. Read a preview
here: ( URL: http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/articles/A1U/HVR-A1U.htm ).
The article claims it'lll
Now all you have to do is define what a blog is.
Some would argue it is just another name for website.
-David
From: Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [videoblogging] Claudio's figuring it out (was: Your oldest vlog
entry)
Date:
Adrian,
I am not sure that I would put myself in the camp of those whose broad
definition of blog would include all websites, but as I mentioned previously
some do. Although I will say I have heard that point made rather
convincingly. For instance, I don't think most would consider
Jen,
Thanks for the input, but I think you are referring to a change in
technology brought about by time, not necessarily a defining characteristic
of either websites or blogs.
Content Management Systems have made life easier for all of us. Heck, one
doesn't even really have to know any
Charles,
Thanks for the great link, I just bookmarked it!
As far as I know, RSS and trackback pings are optional bells and whistles
for both blogs and vlogs. Are there any features specific to blogs that
would differentiate them from common websites?
-David
From: Charles HOPE [EMAIL
Ah, Charles, but the website where I work has an RSS feed and it isn't a
blog (to me). Many website do now. Also, there are many blogs without RSS
and/or trackback pings.
-David
Are there any features specific to blogs that would differentiate them from
common websites?
In the modern usage
Maybe ( URL: http://www.script-o-rama.com/ )
Find something with a lot of parts :)
-David
From: Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] video conference today - special topic
Date: Tue, 16 Aug
Steven,
I don't think there are any hard numbers on video blogging as it is still
somewhat a new phenomenon. Certainly it is growing, but it should be pointed
out that a Pew/Internet survey released January 2 of this year found that
only 38% of Internet users even knew what a blog was --
Not sure if anyone addressed this, as I am catching up on email, working my
way up from the bottom, so I apologize if this redundant:
I am surprised DailyDancer.com is still up and creating new content. This
site finished #7 in the Contagious Media Showdown ( URL:
Aside for a permit so as not to obstruct the normal flow of people, another
thing to be careful of is that it is possible to trademark a building or
landmark. For instance, in Chicago all of Millennium Park is trademarked.
Therefore in order to professionally shoot there you need to pay a
:01 -0700
I disagree with you David. I do not think Verdi's response was unfair
or cruel at all.
I think the point is to raise the bar.
Markus
David Yirchott wrote:
Wow, Verdi. I think that response is, to say the least, a bit unfair. I
don't see the point in trying to cruelly shame somebody
Wow, Verdi. I think that response is, to say the least, a bit unfair. I
don't see the point in trying to cruelly shame somebody out of their dream.
I also don't see the point in publicly damning a member of the community for
simply asking for some help.
RadioMike, I have to get some sleep
Gena,
Sorry this is a long response. If we keep this up we may have the second
book to come from this group! I separated the points with lines to make it
easier to read. I promise I'll try to make any future posts shorter!
I really understand about having too much to do and no time to do it.
If I may, let me present a fuller disclosure than before:
I am not a CBS/Viacom spy. I am not one of the higher-ups at Viacom. I am
not participating in this group for my job. I am not a comapny man. I am
not what I do (Jean-Paul Sartre aside, perhaps I should rephrase that as: I
am not
Gena,
Sorry it took so long for a reply. It's like my life has ADD, I kept getting
interrupted. Anyway, I wanted to stress again that I don't mean to single
you out. This isn't intended as a personal attack. In fact, I think we both
expressed ourselves fairly well. However, I will pick
Cheryl,
Please do not misinterpret the way some people are put off by unsupported,
self-indulgent boasting as misogyny.
I sent two replies to your email. The first, admittedly kinder version
actually arrived after the second due to some sort of email problem on my
end, most likely -- Which
Charles,
I am as much confused by this post as I am by the cluetrain website...
You wrote:
The corporate culture is smarmy. It's press releases written in
impenetrable
jargon
And then, you wrote:
None of them are
screwball idealists dreaming of a breatharian diet. What they and I are
. If
not a little deluded. :)
-David
From: Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Money Changers, out!
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:46:30 +0100
Saturday, July 16, 2005, 7:53:12 PM, David Yirchott wrote:
Some
30 matches
Mail list logo
