one of the new people there was bill grueskin (formerly of WSJ)
http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-grueskin-leaves-i-journal-i-heads-
columbia-j-school
he did infer that he thinks the future is SMALL PRODUCTION
COMPANIES (2-10
ppl)
producing media (this is not a direct quote and he and i
What concerns me most of all is that we really need companies like
Revision3 to succeed. The independent content creator, and in turn,
independent production companies and studios, are really being
overshadowed by the efforts of the Hollywood studios and entertainment
conglomerates. For
Great post.
On 29-Oct-08, at 8:42 AM, Drew wrote:
What concerns me most of all is that we really need companies like
Revision3 to succeed. The independent content creator, and in turn,
independent production companies and studios, are really being
overshadowed by the efforts of the
They control the programing for the masses, because, as I have said
again and again, the masses just want to watch TV, good, TV or what
they perceive as good TV, yes, they may gripe about ads, or quality
but at the end of the day, they just want to sit down and watch TV.
If that's on their
Drew, great post, especially the talent part. I've been dying to start my
own video work back up but I'm good at some things and I totally suck at
some other things and know that the answer is collaboration. If anyone
wants to work collaboratively on a weekly show in the bay area, lemme know.
Further to what Rox said about collective action, it seems to me that
all the things Drew set out in his post would be much more easily
achieved by an organised association or union or company of
independent producers. Those of you who produce shows and treat it
like a business. You know
Drew,
Good thoughts.
I'd ignore hulu etc in the context of the independent scene.
It's a consortium of old media getting their content on the net.
I've written about how I feel that it is a flawed strategy overall but
certainly accomplishes some goals for those involved. hulu, as popular as
it
the union or guild stuff was a focus late 2006/early 2007.
i had setup a blog/group called ourtu.be at the time for discussions on that
but it died out.
group is still out there though - http://groups.google.com/group/ourtube/
maybe someone should refresh those ideas somewhere.
bypass the msm
A thoughtful post, Andrew.
I agree that walled gardens and bandwidth caps are enemies of the
indie content creator, but I'm not convinced building a new Hulu is
the answer.
Plenty of distribution channels exist for good content to bubble up.
We've come far in that department over the past 3
this is where i agree with rick
i dont want to start another company that will end up having similar
struggles
and succumbing to economic hardships
i live in silicon valley/sf area so i have seen many independent minded
people
start up companies only to find out that a year or two down the road
i do agree with drew taht rev3 was too much trying to be like a regular tv
network
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Rick Rey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thoughtful post, Andrew.
I agree that walled gardens and bandwidth caps are enemies of the
indie content creator, but I'm not convinced
If anyone is interested. I can show you the conversions we received
for the Carmex Lip Balm sponsorship we did on Epic Fu, up against a
banner sponsorship we did on the Vimeo lip dub channel. Dollar for
dollar, Epic Fu drove more sign-ups (conversions)...but you didn't
need me to tell you guys
yes i'm very interested
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:07 PM, taulpaulmpls [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If anyone is interested. I can show you the conversions we received
for the Carmex Lip Balm sponsorship we did on Epic Fu, up against a
banner sponsorship we did on the Vimeo lip
count me in. I am also very interested
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wallawallavalley.tv/
http://www.sappdvfilms.comhttp://www.sappdvfilms.com
http://www.wallawallavalley.tv/
If anyone is interested. I can show you the conversions we received
for the Carmex Lip Balm sponsorship we did
Alright, I'll compile a post and get it up here tomorrow.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Doug Sapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
count me in. I am also very interested
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wallawallavalley.tv/
http://www.sappdvfilms.comhttp://www.sappdvfilms.com
Steve and Zadi inspired me to make the crossover to the world of
online video and I am always in their debt. We will see many great
things from them...like we have come to expect. Including keeping
their community active. That is hard and worthwhile work.
D
--- In
shit i go visit my father in offline deep maryland for four days and just
got back
maybe i should have stayed off line
grrr
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:29 PM, danielmcvicar [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Steve and Zadi inspired me to make the crossover to the world of
online video and I am
I just wanted to chime in here and thank everyone for so much support.
We've always said that if it wasn't for the people in this group
supporting us right out of the gate in June 2006, we wouldn't have
ever made it past the first few months. So we really appreciate it.
We were saddened to find
I keep hearing from so many corners, advertisers do not yet grok new media.
They are addicted to large numbers, even though increasingly we learn those
large numbers represent phantom viewers (viewers who tivo, who are passed
out on the couch and cannot act, etc.)
Similarly, we have not had that
i just spent about a week with some fancy-pants columbia jschool people
and we discussed all this kinds of stuffs
yep, i was the only one out of 20 on the alumni committee who is from the
internet
it is totally a transitional period and we are just in the beginning of it
one of the women on the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just saw this now, probably a bit of old news for some, but sad
nonethelessSteve and Zadi are great people and I am sure this is a
kick in the gut in many ways...
21 matches
Mail list logo
