[videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-24 Thread Ms. Kitka
Heather Green has written about Videoblogs before. I like that she's continued on the beat. -Josh I think it's great that she's continuing to write about videoblogs... and I also think it's hilarious that she hasn't learned anything new since the last time she wrote about videoblogging!

[videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-24 Thread Andrew Baron
Thats funny that you would say that she hasnt learned anything new. You must not have been reading her blog or her other stories that she writes for BUSINESS week. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heather Green has written about Videoblogs before. I

[videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread johngaltsjournal
Though they don't give it a link, them lunkheads. And they don't mention that the endeavor is a viral meme of creativity that many people helped to create. And that Erik of Bottomunion created it! It's not your average show by a long shot. Carp Caviar has more to do with audience/ creator

[videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread Ms. Kitka
The writer asked people to submit their favorite vlogs in the comments of her blog a couple of weeks ago... this is how she found Carp Caviar, Tiki Bar TV, etc. I guess since Tiki Bar was the focus of the article, Carp Caviar had to take a back seat. Besides, the article was more focused towards

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Devlon wrote: I know this discussion/rant comes up everytime this type of article comes out, but what is it going to take to get plain ole joe-schmo videoblogs to get a mention? The show ones are cool, don't get me wrong. Kitka, Tiki bar, they are my faves, but I love seeing the odd ball

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread Devlon
Congrats on the press :) That's closer to what I like hearing about (I won't get into the church part of it) Thanks Pete. On 1/23/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Devlon wrote: I know this discussion/rant comes up everytime this type of article comes out, but what is it going

[videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread jonny goldstein
I gave the author of the article, Heather Green, a bunch of links to all kinds of vlogs and she thanked me and said they were fascinating. They didn't make it into her article though. I guess, since it's Business Week, the bias is toward vlogs w/major viewership. Big viewership=more $potential.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread Devlon
Yeah, I've done the same on the two occasions I've had the chance, but same results.On 1/23/06, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I gave the author of the article, Heather Green, a bunch of links to all kinds of vlogs and she thanked me and said they were fascinating. They didn't

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Business Week Article

2006-01-23 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Heather Green has written about Videoblogs before. I like that she's continued on the beat. -Josh On 1/23/06, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I gave the author of the article, Heather Green, a bunch of links to all kinds of vlogs and she thanked me and said they were fascinating.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-29 Thread Randolfe Wicker
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:47 AM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article I followed your lead 2.5 hours later and they published all 1000 characters - the limit. Nobody posted today. Surprising.-- Taylor Barcroft, New Media Publisher, Editor

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-29 Thread Kunga
we are referring to this article: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_36/ b3949087_mz063.htm My 1000 characters are obvious at the bottom, second in comments. Nickname: FutureMedia -- Taylor Barcroft, New Media Publisher, Editor-In-Chief, Vidcaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-29 Thread Randolfe Wicker
2005 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article we are referring to this article: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_36/ b3949087_mz063.htm My 1000 characters are obvious at the bottom, second in comments. Nickname: FutureMedia-- Taylor Barcroft,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-29 Thread Kunga
All my news group mail goes to my Kunga address. It's my Buddhist refuge name. Means All Joy. But i do not using it professionally at all. That is you won't see it anywhere but here including not in my sig. Even in the Flash meetings I now go by Taylor. I don't want to create confusion in

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Verdi
Taylor, the email address you use for the yahoo group says your name is Kunga - see below. You should change that too. Mine used to say Michael Verdi but since there are so many Michaels I changed it to Verdi which people call me all the time for some reason. -- Verdi URL:

[videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-27 Thread petertheman
I am unclear how much we are allowed to express personal feelings in this space. Of course you are allowed to express personal feelings here. We try to be a friendly group, after all ;) Peter Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games

[videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread Steve Watkins
Great stuff, Im not sick of it at all, and there always seems to be some new numbers or news thrown in to fascinate me. Wahey subscriptions for extra content, groovy, is there any chance this might incorrporate my requests to pay for a higher resolution rocketboom? Did I hear someone say

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread andrew michael baron
The idea is basically this: 1. Rocketboom.com will always be free. No matter what changes in the world or in the future. Amanda and I have decided this a long time ago and still feel most strongly about this #1 principle. 2. Hopefully we can stay away from ads and pay for it by licensing it

[videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread Troy LeMaire
I don't see a red flag, but I do see some possible short term growth pains. Even with the technology side covered as you speak of, it won't be an easy road. But, if you plan your @ss off, like it seems you are doing, then it will be that much easier to get over this short term growth hump.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread Randolfe Wicker
cketboom's popularity also shows that there is a very real and growing audience for vlogs with consistent quality and theme. - Original Message - From: Steve Watkins To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:00 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread Kunga
That was extremely generous of you to share with us Andrew. You are very well grounded. Anyone have some links on the implementation of #5? Get a torrent, give them clients, tell them to d/l at THE SAME TIME! Its built in to the technology already to some degree, people dont need to do

Re: [videoblogging] Re: business week article

2005-08-26 Thread Kunga
I find myself near crying a lot about what is happening here. Is that too personal a comment to make on this list? I am unclear how much we are allowed to express personal feelings in this space. I think you all are creating an entirely new medium out of the parts of the past combined with