[videoblogging] Re: november 1
Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1
Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1
If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project that could use a shot in the arm. http://100seconds.org/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.comartists-in-the-cloud%40googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comartists-in-the-cloud%2Bunsubscribe%40googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1
Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;) 90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote: If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project that could use a shot in the arm. http://100seconds.org/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.comartists-in-the-cloud %40googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comartists-in- the-cloud%2Bunsubscribe%40googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1
Just to be clear, re-reading this - I didn't mean to sound properly exasperated. Was laughing. I do like the whole concept of the 100seconds film festival - should have said this. It's an outlet that a lot of us could submit videos to. But the 90 seconds videos would still qualify for the festival, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 3:11 PM, Rupert Howe wrote: Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;) 90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote: If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project that could use a shot in the arm. http://100seconds.org/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.mi...@... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.comartists-in-the-cloud %40googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comartists- in- the-cloud%2Bunsubscribe%40googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1 ( no time limit)
I think the original idea is to participate ..it doesnt matter time limits...fuck them...just make your video in the way you want and like and acknowledge your presence to the world...just be sure to be there everyday or whenever you can do it-during November... no rules...just your will to be a passionated videoblogger and DO IT !!! peace John Dkar http://twitter.com/JohnDkarFilms http://twitwall.com/JohnDkarFilms http://www.facebook.com/johndkarfilms http://www.youtube.com/JohnDkar --- On Wed, 10/28/09, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: From: Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 11:47 AM Just to be clear, re-reading this - I didn't mean to sound properly exasperated. Was laughing. I do like the whole concept of the 100seconds film festival - should have said this. It's an outlet that a lot of us could submit videos to. But the 90 seconds videos would still qualify for the festival, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 3:11 PM, Rupert Howe wrote: Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;) 90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote: If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project that could use a shot in the arm. http://100seconds. org/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog. tv wrote: Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.miles@ ... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-- ---~--~-- --~-- --~-- -~--~ ~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the- cl...@googlegrou ps.comartists-in- the-cloud %40googlegroups. com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the- cloud+unsubscrib e...@googlegroups. comartists- in- the-cloud%2Bunsubsc ribe%40googlegro ups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups. google.com/ group/artists- in-the-cloud? hl=en or visit http://artistsinthe cloud.com -~-- ~~--- -~~-- ~ ~--~- -~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1 ( no time limit)
Sure. This thread was about the parameters for the other 30 day game, not the full NaVloPoMo. If you're doing a video every day in November for NaVloPoMo - go for it, do whatever you want! On 28-Oct-09, at 5:13 PM, John Cardenas wrote: I think the original idea is to participate ..it doesnt matter time limits...fuck them...just make your video in the way you want and like and acknowledge your presence to the world...just be sure to be there everyday or whenever you can do it-during November... no rules...just your will to be a passionated videoblogger and DO IT !!! peace John Dkar http://twitter.com/JohnDkarFilms http://twitwall.com/JohnDkarFilms http://www.facebook.com/johndkarfilms http://www.youtube.com/JohnDkar --- On Wed, 10/28/09, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote: From: Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2009, 11:47 AM Just to be clear, re-reading this - I didn't mean to sound properly exasperated. Was laughing. I do like the whole concept of the 100seconds film festival - should have said this. It's an outlet that a lot of us could submit videos to. But the 90 seconds videos would still qualify for the festival, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 3:11 PM, Rupert Howe wrote: Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;) 90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though, wouldn't they? On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote: If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project that could use a shot in the arm. http://100seconds. org/ On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog. tv wrote: Yes. On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less? Miguel. Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about length. So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch. There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate, format or location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it. PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the discussion's been happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there. On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote: hi all OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around 1minute, is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90 seconds...) also, any other constraints in terms of: 1. dimensions 2. bit rate 3. format 4. location one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way where if transcoded the thing will break but if transcoding is fundamental then like to know :-) oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me. cheers Adrian Miles adrian.miles@ ... Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours vogmae.net.au --~--~-- ---~--~-- --~-- --~-- -~--~ ~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group - Artists in the Cloud. To post to this group, send email to artists-in-the- cl...@googlegrou ps.comartists-in- the- cloud %40googlegroups. com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to artists-in-the- cloud+unsubscrib e...@googlegroups. comartists- in- the-cloud%2Bunsubsc ribe%40googlegro ups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups. google.com/ group/artists- in-the-cloud? hl=en or visit http://artistsinthe cloud.com -~-- ~~--- -~~-- ~ ~--~- -~--- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: november 1
personally I'd treat the 90 secs as max... On 29/10/2009, at 12:48 AM, miglsd27 wrote: Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less?
