Just to be clear, re-reading this - I didn't mean to sound properly  
exasperated.  Was laughing.
I do like the whole concept of the 100seconds film festival - should  
have said this.  It's an outlet that a lot of us could submit videos to.
But the 90 seconds videos would still qualify for the festival,  
wouldn't they?


On 28-Oct-09, at 3:11 PM, Rupert Howe wrote:

> Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;)
>
> 90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though,
> wouldn't they?
>
> On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote:
>
> > If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing
> > project
> > that could use a shot in the arm.
> >
> > http://100seconds.org/
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe
> > <rup...@twittervlog.tv> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less?
> > > >
> > > > Miguel.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4
> > votes
> > > > > for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no
> > limits
> > > > > at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a  
> view
> > > > about
> > > > > length.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length.
> > That
> > > > > way all 30 videos together would take 45 mins to watch.
> > > > >
> > > > > There were no other restrictions on dimensions, bit rate,
> > format or
> > > > > location. Do what you need to do, wherever you need to do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > PS you posted this to artists in the cloud, but the  
> discussion's
> > > > been
> > > > > happening on the yahoo vb group, so i'll reply there.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 28-Oct-09, at 5:43 AM, Adrian Miles wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hi all
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, not sure of where this ended up. We've agreed to around
> > > > 1minute,
> > > > > > is that right? (or was it up to 3, or did we settle on 90
> > > > seconds...)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > also, any other constraints in terms of:
> > > > > > 1. dimensions
> > > > > > 2. bit rate
> > > > > > 3. format
> > > > > > 4. location
> > > > > >
> > > > > > one reason I ask is I'd prefer to stay QT native in a way
> > where if
> > > > > > transcoded the thing will break.... but if transcoding is
> > > > fundamental
> > > > > > then like to know :-)
> > > > > > oh, and since I'm in Australia nov 1 comes early for me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers
> > > > > > Adrian Miles
> > > > > > adrian.mi...@...
> > > > > > Program Director, Bachelor of Communication Honours
> > > > > > vogmae.net.au
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > Group - "Artists in the Cloud".
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > artists-in-the-cl...@googlegroups.com<artists-in-the-cloud
> > %40googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > artists-in-the-cloud+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<artists- 
> in-
> > the-cloud%2Bunsubscribe%40googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/artists-in-the-cloud?hl=en
> > > > > > or visit http://artistsinthecloud.com
> > > > > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to