Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-18 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Steve (and Mieser) for being respectful.My original pointthat was quickly set ablaze was that I'm tired of the same peoplegetting all the hype. The fact that the same people are getting all the press attention over and over again is

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Steve Garfield
The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls. http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:09 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote: Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from this group. --Steve -- Home

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Steve Watkins
Personally I think labelling someone a troll at this early stage could be seen as exactly the sort of defensive action that an 'old guard' network might take, thus providing evidence for his case. Its just too easy to dismiss people as trolls, what about the actual issues? I have some trouble

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread ManCheeseMo
Thank you Steve (and Mieser) for being respectful. My original point that was quickly set ablaze was that I'm tired of the same people getting all the hype. It is funny how those were the same people (and a few of their friends) who quicky came to start the fire. Given my distaste for

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Enric
Labelling is innacurate either way, troll or old boys network. People are volitional and create their future, so a label does not define what a person will be. But people label based on people's prior actions. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Sullivan
cheeseman,i have an idea for you.i think you might have a theme for a vloggo make it happen.then let us know.sullOn 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Steve (and Mieser) for being respectful.My original pointthat was quickly set ablaze was that I'm tired of the same

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread R. Kristiansen
we need to stop taking ourselves, and each other, too seriously. please, guys and gals, let's not make this go the direction of the podcastosphere. where, in the end, a lot of feathers are ruffled over who did what at what time on wikipedia. :) I like Garfield, I like Watkins, and I like

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Adam Quirk
On 12/16/05, R. Kristiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: now i will go and talk to the camera for ten minutes nonstop, without any makeup, any editing, or any fancy topic. I just got done talking to my bank on the phone for 10 minutes nonstop, in full makeup and costume, with 2 hot-lights and a

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Jay dedman
Thank you Steve (and Mieser) for being respectful. My original point that was quickly set ablaze was that I'm tired of the same people getting all the hype. It is funny how those were the same people (and a few of their friends) who quicky came to start the fire. Given my distaste for

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Steve Garfield
Hey David Jr, I just looked up Paul Revere. http://darter.ocps.net/classroom/revolution/revere.htm You are right. Thanks for pointing that out. Changing my footer Look forward to watching your show on Tuesday at 10:30 at http://www.davidjr.com/tv On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:17 PM, ManCheeseMo

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread taoofdavid65
*snicker* *chuckle* *cough* *snort* I was wondering when someone was going to make note of Mr David Jr. But of course... not surprising that it's Jay who does the honors ;) Good on ya ol boy! This has been a hoot to sit back and watch the sparks fly over this while I was at work today. Thanks

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread ManCheeseMo
Sadly, David Jr. is benefiting from all this. For the record, I have no idea who the hell that guy is. He is from the East Coast and I'm in the Midwest. At first I thought this was rather amusing, but then realize how this furthers my point. Yet again, a sorry attempt to string someone up.

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Jay dedman
Sadly, David Jr. is benefiting from all this. For the record, I have no idea who the hell that guy is. He is from the East Coast and I'm in the Midwest. At first I thought this was rather amusing, but then realize how this furthers my point. Yet again, a sorry attempt to string someone up.

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread ManCheeseMo
No, this is what happens when people become overly defensive and look for a way to publicly ridicule someone. I'm not sure what anonymity you're talking about. I'm here communicating with you. Do I need a vlog to have an identity? Would you rather I give out my full name, social security

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Enric
Feed a troll and they'll bite. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, this is what happens when people become overly defensive and look for a way to publicly ridicule someone. I'm not sure what anonymity you're talking about. I'm here

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread ManCheeseMo
Ironic - aren't you being a troll with your witty one-liners? Oops, now I just fed you. Let's see how fast you bite. ;) Or maybe we can be men and agree to disagree? I'm tired of getting flamed. Next topic please! --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feed a

[videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Enric
Join EvilVlog! http://www.evilvlog.com/?p=369 Munch --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ironic - aren't you being a troll with your witty one-liners? Oops, now I just fed you. Let's see how fast you bite. ;) Or maybe we can be men and agree to

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Randolfe Wicker
4:09 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging) Hey David Jr,I just looked up Paul Revere.http://darter.ocps.net/classroom/revolution/revere.htmYou are right.Thanks for pointing that out.Changing my footerLook forward to watching

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Michael I
eoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging) Hey David Jr,I just looked up Paul Revere.http://darter.ocps.net/classroom/revolution/revere.htmYou are right.Thanks for pointing that out.Changing my foot

Re: [videoblogging] TROLL ALERT (was Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging)

2005-12-16 Thread Christopher Weagel
YOU WERE GIVEN A SOLEMN INVITATION offering you a right correct position for a PROPER DEFENCE! Pay attention, Asshole! http://www.evilvlog.com/?p=369 Chris Weagel Living it up with the GOOD OL' BOYS in our posh GOOGLE-FUNDED Suite! On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:52 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote: No, this