[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-11 Thread breesidhe2000
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to take a different approach to this. Most folks start with the technology and not with the potential viewers needs. Nothing wrong about looking at the tools but let me suggest another way to look at this challenge.

[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-11 Thread Gena
Point taken. signlog just sounds better to a deaf guys eyes. =) Signvlog? Yes, I love it - and not only that you get to create the sign for it. Understanding my vlog - well now, I am a (text) wordy kind of person so you would have a grip as to what the video is about. Yes, I use audio. Many times

[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-10 Thread Steve Watkins
Greetings, Welcome to the group. Im just about to eat dinner but here is a brief start at replying to the questions youve raised. I havent seen the features you need in a CMS. I havent seen a CMS thats truly built video into the heart of its system. Drupal and wordpress video modules do work,

[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-10 Thread breesidhe2000
Its probably worth following up with that guy for some ideas, but I'm on a different focus. original news content of exclusively signed videos (no subtitles), with a larger community oriented focus, instead of a single blog. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-10 Thread breesidhe2000
Thanks for the good advice. Although not a solution, it gets me closer to one. =) Your advice to start small is quite wise. I'm actually aiming to do that, but trying to be forward thinking so I resolve problems before hand, instead of being trapped into platform that can't grow with the

[videoblogging] Re: Not a videoblog, a 'signlog'!

2005-10-10 Thread Gena
I'd like to take a different approach to this. Most folks start with the technology and not with the potential viewers needs. Nothing wrong about looking at the tools but let me suggest another way to look at this challenge. *What is the bandwith that most of the viewers will be using? If they