On 11/5/05, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:...
If aggregators, search engines, etc rely on opt-in, there will be no
aggregation, searching, etc, and in the end no videoblogging.
---
I don't believe that statement to be true. I believe there should be a
clear distinction betw
On 11/4/05, Ted Tagami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If a site relies on traffic to it's pages for revenue, then this could be shown to be criminal.
They also have it backwards. We should not have to "opt out" of their
aggregation, but rather "opt in" to it. I don't like it either. Their
opt-ou
> If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you
> already presumably opting in?
Thats my feeling - at least if you're using a cc license it is.
On 11/5/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Part of the problem is that they probably can't have their software r
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:47:39 +0100, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> They also have it backwards. We should not have to "opt out" of their
>> aggregation, but rather "opt in" to it. I don't like it either.
>
> If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you already
>
> They also have it backwards. We should not have to "opt out" of their
> aggregation, but rather "opt in" to it. I don't like it either.
If you provide a syndication feed of your content, aren't you already
presumably opting in?
Additionally, if your content is CC licensed (depending on which C
If a site relies on traffic to it's pages for revenue, then this could be shown to be criminal.
They also have it backwards. We should not have to "opt out" of their
aggregation, but rather "opt in" to it. I don't like it either. Their
opt-out page seems broken.On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PRO
That's why it's a good idea to have your url in you video somewhere? I put mine at the end. On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Here's my issue. They take my videos and place them on their site
without giving any credit to the authors. They provide no links to the
original content
On 11/4/05, Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you be precise about what the problem is, so that other
> videoblog aggregators can avoid making you feel badly treated?
Well if my videos were up there I'd be upset because they present the
content as if they are the site of origin.
My CC
Here's my issue. They take my videos and place them on their site without giving any credit to the authors. They provide no links to the original content. Their "original content" link goes back to their own site. There is another link that is broken that I guess could take you to the author's si
On 11/4/05, Lynn Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I
> put up and placing them on their site.
Are you under the impression that they're making copies, Lynn?
These guys are about the same as the old i638 (or whatever they were)
peop
I notice that blogtelevision.net is taking all of the videos that I
put up and placing them on their site. They don't give me credit or
anything for my work. Do any of you have any feelings towards this
site or that issue regarding the usage of your work. They also place
a link to the video
11 matches
Mail list logo
