Most DVCAM decks will also play miniDV. But his will likely only work with PAL
Definitely go for a PAL MiniDV camera is my advice.
Once compressed to mp4 for internet, it will be viewable on any computer,
joly
At 11:39 AM 12/18/2005, you wrote:
>Thanks Paul, All:
>That was helpful. I di
Vincent,
Unforunately, I have only limited experience of dv decks, I have used one
before in Video Production Class, I didn't notice whether it had any relevance
to pal or ntsc. But when exporting into Final Cut, or Imovie, one has to set
wether it is DV pal or DV ntsc, I am only gue
Vincent,
Unforunately, I have only limited experience of dv decks, I have used one before in Video Production Class, I didn't notice whether it had any relevance to pal or ntsc. But when exporting into Final Cut, or Imovie, one has to set wether it is DV pal or DV ntsc, I am only guessing but I th
Thanks Paul, All:
That was helpful. I didn't think it mattered if in the end it ended up online.
However, your point about previewing on TV seems relevant. My partner in Kenya
has also mentioned the use of a DVCam Deck (I think because he too has a
background in TV). Do you know if DV D
Thanks Paul, All:That was helpful. I didn't think it mattered if in the end it ended up online. However, your point about previewing on TV seems relevant. My partner in Kenya has also mentioned the use of a DVCam Deck (I think because he too has a background in TV). Do you know if DV Deck's typi
ha, very punny
Paul Knight wrote:
Hey Richard
No hard feeling there.
Paul
On 18 Dec 2005, at 13:03, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:
>Just a pity that you have nothing else better to
do
with your Sundays.
>May be you should have answered this before me, then w
Hey Richard
No hard feeling there.
Paul
On 18 Dec 2005, at 13:03, Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote:
>Just a pity that you have nothing else better to do with your Sundays.
>May be you should have answered this before me, then we wouldn't be
>having this mass-debate(pun) now.
I wasn't answeri
>Just a pity that you have nothing else better to do with your Sundays.
>May be you should have answered this before me, then we wouldn't be
>having this mass-debate(pun) now.
I wasn't answering the original question, because I didn't know the
answer, and may have posted incorrect information.
HI richard,ohh who's the smarty pants. All I do is offer a little advice on a subject that no-one bothered to answer to and then I am corrected by someone like yourself, who jumps right in there just to correct me. When the real point of having a pal camera or an ntsc camera is whether or not y
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:38:41 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While NTSC has a higher frame rate, PAL has a higher scan line count
> and more accurate colour reproduction, so it is just plain wrong to
> say that "you get slightly better video reproducion on NTSC".
I t
Hi Paul,
>Pal has a frames per second rate of 25 where as ntsc has 29.7, which
>in real terms means you get slightly better video reproduction on
>ntsc
While I'd ordinarily jump in and correct you here, you say you were a
TV tech, so you should probably correct yourself. :-)
While NTSC has a
Hi Vincent,
Pal is the accepted format for most of the world, but it's not entirely future proof. The best thing to do is to get a HD camera, Sony and Panasonic do HD cameras, they are expensive, now but well worth it when it comes down to editing in the future. Pal has a frames per second rate
Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really
matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be
filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL "half" of the world and my
friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter?
regards,
vi
13 matches
Mail list logo
