Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Eddie Codel
that's weird. i'm waiting to see how this all shakes out before i decide if i want my feeds removed. i think i'm happy for it to be there as long as there is proper attribution and link backs. -eddie On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Enric wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread robert a/k/a r
Adding link-backs is not the point. If you are extending such and offer to Veoh please make it clear it's not representative of an agreement by any class copyrightholders who may be vloggers on this list and your own personal offer. On Apr 8, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Jay dedman wrote: >> It is in

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Peter Van Dijck
On 4/8/06, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding linkbacks to the entries is not enough. > > The issue is rehosting content that you do not have permission to > rehost and assuming it falls under your own terms of use Exactly. Here's what I want to see Veoh do: 1) Stop spidering fee

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Anne Walk
hi Jay,I don't agree that adding obvious linkback is a solution because Veoh is a social site with memberships, ratings, profiles, friends, etc. I do not like the implication that I am a member of a community because my stuff was spidered into it. Linking back may give a means to finding my site

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Adding linkbacks to the entries is not enough. The issue is rehosting content that you do not have permission to rehost and assuming it falls under your own terms of use (as though it were willfully uploaded by a consenting user who has chosen to opt in to the service). This denies traffic from t

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Jay dedman
> It is in our marketing group's to-do list, and is on my calendar. I > have already approved the budget for the terabyte sponsorship. > > From the vloggercon web site -- > > "Vloggercon needs sponsorships to keep the price of the conference > down– we aren't a bunch of Hollywood Fat Cats, y'know.

RE: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-08 Thread Randy Mann
>From: "dmitry_veoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear >Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 04:56:03 - > >Anne, > >I undertand your frustration, but I assure you we are no

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-07 Thread Stephanie Bryant
Er Um My husband sells adult DVDs over the Internet. He's a very above-the-board businessman, which is why we don't live in a mansion in Beverly Hills. But, yeah. Porn servers tend to buy more bandwidth than they need. So I use some. Just so it doesn't go to waste, you understand. --Steph

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-07 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,On 4/7/06, dmitry_veoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anne,I undertand your frustration, but I assure you we are not doing thisto inflate numbers.  We are just trying to create a good service.  Iagree that this is serious business, but I think that our intent is in line with video bloggers; to

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear

2006-04-07 Thread Anne Walk
I honestly don't know how this can be made right.First thing, though, stop spidering immediately. Remove all unclaimed feeds at once. Not just the feeds of those who discover what you are doing. All of them. Doing those things could go a long way in showing your intentions.On 4/7/06, dmitry_veoh