Re: [videoblogging] Re: Why Not Use .MP4?

2006-02-11 Thread Michael Verdi
Hey Greg,On 2/11/06, ecomputerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on my observations that H.264 takes up more CPU than 3ivx, mypresumption is that it also takes more battery power.I've never did a test but I know my computer gets hotter so it must be using more power when playing

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Why Not Use .MP4?

2006-02-11 Thread Michael Verdi
I think you might be right about Apple doing it on purpose. I just made a DVD of some video that I'd been working with and used Handbrake to rip it to mp4 using H.264 as the codec and it won't transfer to my iPod. This used to work. Very disappointing.-VerdiOn 2/11/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Why Not Use .MP4?

2006-02-11 Thread Michael Verdi
I just tried iSquint - that's a fantastic solution for Mac users. You can set the bit rate for the video and the audio - fast start works, syncs to iPod. Fast started in Firefox on my PC. So, is iSquint doing the encoding without using the Quicktime software that's built in to the OS? Why would