(* n (factorial (- n 1)
should mean it takes about 650ms for someone to see there are 5
close parentheses at the end. It takes me about 3 seconds of
concious effort to reach that number. Moving the cursor over them
is one option, but it is slower. I think another might be if I can
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Tim Chase wrote:
(* n (factorial (- n 1)
[3 secs for me to count, moving cursor over is slower]
find a font and a means of displaying it which slightly disturbs the
spacing, position or shape of successive parentheses, so the pattern is
[...]
Hugh Sasse wrote:
I am interested in exploring Lisp before too long. However, I
have a physical problem with the parentheses.
You may find rainbow.vim helpful; see
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RAINBOW
It colorizes brackets [] {} () based on nesting level.
Regards,
Hugh Sasse wrote:
I am interested in exploring Lisp before too long. However, I
have a physical problem with the parentheses. My nystagmus
means that just outside the subitizing range my time to count
parentheses increases dramatically. According to wikipedia
it should increase at roughly
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
I am interested in exploring Lisp before too long. However, I have a
physical problem with the parentheses.
You may find rainbow.vim helpful; see
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RAINBOW
that
Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
I am interested in exploring Lisp before too long. However, I have a
physical problem with the parentheses.
You may find rainbow.vim helpful; see
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
I am interested in exploring Lisp before too long. However, I have a
physical problem with the parentheses.
