On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:57:33 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem that I see is that adding a strong encryption
function can have regulation issues. That was the only reason that I
thought about using the external library is to get around this.
With an algorithm like Rijndael
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
I'm unable to grasp the description ( attachment ) given in the regxp.c
file. For a moment they seem like NFA fragments for operators |,+,* and
so on, but then again I'm in doubt ( specially i don't understand what a
node in this context is ). A little help is greatly
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
A 'k' would be greatly appreciated.
I'm really really sorry, won't happen again...
I'm unable to grasp the description ( attachment ) given in the regxp.c
On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
A 'k' would be greatly appreciated.
I'm really really sorry, won't happen again...
Hehe, don't take it
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to
cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in
error as well.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
David Brown
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:49:53PM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
A 'k' would be greatly appreciated.
David Brown wrote:
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to
cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in
error as well.
Any ideas?
Highlighting curly braces inside parenthesis
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What the heck is
this good for?
Martin
--
Martin Krischik
mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpqr1CVAZVlY.pgp
Description: PGP
Martin Krischik wrote:
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What
the heck is this good for?
It is a constant structure, useful, in this case, as a macro to
indicate a
On 19/03/2007 17:39, David Brown wrote:
Martin Krischik wrote:
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What
the heck is this good for?
It is a constant structure,
On 3/19/07, Matthew Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:57:33 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem that I see is that adding a strong encryption
function can have regulation issues. That was the only reason that I
thought about using the external library is
Hi all,
I'm a bit frustrated by a particular behaviour of vim, and today I modified the
source code to 'fix' it. I'd be very grateful for some opinions if you
a) agree with my thoughts, or
b) have a better solution.
The problem - is when you run a command that outputs messages to vim - over
Peng Yu wrote:
Suppose I have horizontal splited window1 and window2, is there any
way to change them into vertical split and vice versa?
See
http://vim.sourceforge.net/tips/tip.php?tip_id=862 How to toggle
between all vertical and all horizontal window layout
Regards,
Chip Campbell
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
A 'k' would be greatly appreciated.
I'm really really sorry, won't happen
I think you have mischievous colleagues.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, petern wrote:
Hi dear vim lovers.
When I type some text in input mode and for example go to make a coffee
without leaving the input mode, and then get back to my computer, vim has
exited input mode. That's OK. But what confuses me
On 3/19/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bram, Nicolai,
A 'k' would be
Hi all,
I use VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 23 2007 22:17:23)
to write mainly XHTML/PHP and I sometimes have to get content from word
processed documents and paste it into Vim for HTML markup. This usually
results in having non-visually detectable characters (which I assume are
On 3/19/07, Mitch Wiedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way I can have my Vim highlight these characters so I can see
them and replace them with their HTML counterparts?
No idea about highlighting, but exactly to replace strange characters
with HTML or LaTeX or anything else or to do
On 2007-03-19, Mitch Wiedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I use VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 23 2007 22:17:23)
to write mainly XHTML/PHP and I sometimes have to get content from word
processed documents and paste it into Vim for HTML markup. This usually
results in
I use VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 23 2007 22:17:23)
to write mainly XHTML/PHP and I sometimes have to get content from word
processed documents and paste it into Vim for HTML markup. This usually
results in having non-visually detectable characters (which I assume are
high
On 2007-03-19, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-03-19, Mitch Wiedemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I use VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 23 2007 22:17:23)
to write mainly XHTML/PHP and I sometimes have to get content from word
processed documents and
Hello,
I would like to remove everything after a text highlight in a line for
all the lines in a file.
What are the commands to be used in Vim. I would appreciate your help.
00,000,00
00,000,00
I want to remove everything after , for all the lines.
Regards,
Auro
I would like to remove everything after a text highlight in a line for
all the lines in a file.
What are the commands to be used in Vim. I would appreciate your help.
00,000,00
00,000,00
I want to remove everything after , for all the lines.
You have two commas...if
Hi all,
I was recently discussing some features of vim that I use a lot with a
friend and asking if he knew of ways to do certain things better, and
one issue that both of us have is that we create newlines with o or O
and then go back to normal mode immediately afterwards.
So I often end up
John Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-03-19 21:23:59:
Hi all,
I'm a bit frustrated by a particular behaviour of vim, and today I
modified the source code to 'fix' it. I'd be very grateful for some
opinions if you
a) agree with my thoughts, or
b) have a better solution.
The problem - is when
John Orr wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit frustrated by a particular behaviour of vim, and today I modified the
source code to 'fix' it. I'd be very grateful for some opinions if you
a) agree with my thoughts, or
b) have a better solution.
The problem - is when you run a command that outputs
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-03-20 11:18:06:
To go back in the scrolling display, in Vim 7 (but not in Vim 6 or
earlier)
you can use Up or PageUp depending on how far you want to go back.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Hi Tony,
Anyway to prevent 'more-prompt' from changing into
fREW wrote:
Hi all,
I was recently discussing some features of vim that I use a lot with a
friend and asking if he knew of ways to do certain things better, and
one issue that both of us have is that we create newlines with o or O
and then go back to normal mode immediately afterwards.
So I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-03-20 11:18:06:
To go back in the scrolling display, in Vim 7 (but not in Vim 6 or
earlier)
you can use Up or PageUp depending on how far you want to go back.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Hi Tony,
Anyway to prevent 'more-prompt'
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-03-20 11:58:26:
After hitting Up once at the Hit-Enter prompt you're back to the
More-prompt
so _then_ you can use PageUp again.
IMHO it is advantageous to have a different prompt at the end of the
message
because it tells you that there's nothing to
Hi Tony, (and others),
Thanks for your (tireless) input, yes, Ctrl-C is certainly a good suggestion,
that works consistently, with no error bells/flashes, no matter how far through
the messages you are.
And I totally agree that it's good to make it easy to know when there is more
output to
John Orr wrote:
Hi Tony, (and others),
Thanks for your (tireless) input, yes, Ctrl-C is certainly a good suggestion,
that works consistently, with no error bells/flashes, no matter how far through
the messages you are.
And I totally agree that it's good to make it easy to know when there is
32 matches
Mail list logo
