Re: Suggestion: numbers for completion menu?

2007-01-24 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 1/23/07, Marc Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be convinient to get an item from the completion menu faster than downdown .. or typing more characters. What do you think of prepending each item with a number and add a key-mapping c-iidx to get the idxth item? so c-i4 would select the

plugin loading ordering

2007-01-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
According to my reading of :help load-plugins the plugins should be loaded following the runtimepath ordering. That is: first load all the plugins in the first component of runtimepath, then all the plugins in the second component and so on. According to my experiments however this is not the

Re: plugin loading ordering

2007-01-24 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: According to my reading of :help load-plugins the plugins should be loaded following the runtimepath ordering. That is: first load all the plugins in the first component of runtimepath, then all the plugins in the second component and so on. According to my experiments

Re: plugin loading ordering

2007-01-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:48:03AM +0100, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: That's what :scriptnames should show. If a plugin has a :finish clause near the start, it might get loaded and do nothing, but still appear in the :scriptnames listing. Thanks, I was not aware of the :scriptnames command. What

Re: BOF Vim 8 - Suggestions

2007-01-24 Thread Marcus Aurelius
--- A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: This approach has already been attempted, not just once as Bram said, but at least twice (evim and mswin.vim), and the results are far from convincing: easy vim is actually harder to use, and mswin.vim makes some useful Vim features