Hi Gary,
On 4/27/07, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-04-27, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-04-26, Navdeep Parhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that allows the use of
> > the location list instead of the q
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
I guess most Turkish characters are in latin1, only the ones that are
not won't work with 'langmap'.
small undotted i, g-breve, s-cedilla, ...
Best regards,
Tony.
--
The primary requisite for any new tax law is for it to exempt enough
voters to win the next electi
On 2007-04-27, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-04-26, Navdeep Parhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that allows the use of
> > the location list instead of the quickfix list. However, :scscope
> > has no equivalent that u
On 4/27/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and
> presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone
> thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made?
Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7
On 2007-04-26, Navdeep Parhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that allows the use of
> the location list instead of the quickfix list. However, :scscope
> has no equivalent that uses the location list. Please note that
> :scs splits only if csc
Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that allows the use of the
> location list instead of the quickfix list. However, :scscope has no
> equivalent that uses the location list. Please note that :scs splits
> only if cscope returns some results, so :scs is not the sam
Ali Polatel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I was playing around with langmap and found out there is a problem with
> characters
> 'ı'[1] - 0131;LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS I - and
> 'Ä'[2] - 011F;LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH BREVE
> The Turkish keyboard looks like this[3]Â for those who don't know abo
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Tomas Golembiovsky wrote:
> > Greetings mortals,
> >
> > today somebody came to #vim, and pasted some modeline (containig joke or
> > such). He muttered something about not knowing what that means and left
> > before long. But (!) what I noticed is that feedkeys() was us
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and
> presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone
> thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made?
Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7.1. Unfortunately I haven't found a good
moment to make
Tomas Golembiovsky wrote:
> today somebody came to #vim, and pasted some modeline (containig joke or
> such). He muttered something about not knowing what that means and left
> before long. But (!) what I noticed is that feedkeys() was used as part of
> foldexpression and it turned out that feedk
Patch 7.0.234
Problem:It's possible to use feedkeys() from a modeline. That is a
security issue, can be used for a trojan horse.
Solution: Disallow using feedkeys() in the sandbox.
Files: src/eval.c
*** ../vim-7.0.233/src/eval.c Thu Apr 26 17:08:16 2007
--- src/eval.c
Michael Henry wrote :
> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> > Tomas Golembiovsky wrote:
> >> vim: fdm=expr fde=feedkeys("\\:!touch\ phantom_was_here\\")
> >>
> >> I guess you can see the consequences. Is this known/intentional?
> >>
> >
> > IIUC, feedkeys() called from sandbox should execute as if in s
The svn tree has all patches already inside, it does not matter
how many patches are there. You just checkout and build.
It's not that you need to download baseline and then 222 patches, no.
Yakov
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the insane number of patches collecting
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/27/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>
>> > - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today.
FYI, Vim
>> > 6.2 went to 532 patches, see
On 4/27/07, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
>
>> > - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim
>> > 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vi
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim
> 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/
Release early, release often :)
Isn't that what'
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim
> 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/
Release early, release often :)
Yes, I admit that you are right. But unfortuna
Hello,
Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that allows the use of the location
list instead of the quickfix list. However, :scscope has no equivalent that
uses the location list. Please note that :scs splits only if cscope returns
some results, so :scs is not the same as ":split cs". Du
Tomas Golembiovsky wrote:
Greetings mortals,
today somebody came to #vim, and pasted some modeline (containig joke or
such). He muttered something about not knowing what that means and left
before long. But (!) what I noticed is that feedkeys() was used as part of
foldexpression and it turned ou
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim
> 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/
Release early, release often :)
Isn't that what's being done? We're at
20 matches
Mail list logo