On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:52:29AM +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Tim Johnson wrote:
Using vim 7.0 on kubuntu 7.04 (feisty fawn amd 64)
I've recently migrated from vim 6-something on slack 10.0
On my previous version and box, if I searched on an expression
in one file, closed it and opened
Tushar Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-31 13:51:28:
I recently upgraded from vim 7.0 to vim 7.1 (on ubuntu feisty) by
compiling the vim7.1 tarball.
Did you make install from the tarball?
If compiled from tarball, the prefix defaults to /usr/local, while the
ubuntu official version will be in
On Wed, 30 May 2007 14:21:27 -0400, Kevin Old [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not sure if everyone's seen this, but it's definitely cool and quite accurate.
http://ajaxian.com/archives/jsvi-you-love-vi-you-love-javascript-now-you-have-both
Unfortunately, in Opera it detects shift-presses as extra
Forward to list.
Best regards,
Tony.
Original Message
Subject: Re: No Previous Regular expression
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:02:36 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL
Hi There,
I can't make use of built-in compiler facility in vim.
Tried the help files(quickfix and FAQ) as well but couldn't get much
about the same.
I want to compile a project, where the files are distributed among different
directories.
I have my own makefile but want to make use
Edward L. Fox wrote:
[...]
A friend told me that he is developing a Firefox addon to emulate the
Vi/Vim behaviors in all text areas in Firefox, without launching
external applications. I'm looking forward to it.
[...]
I don't think any Vim extension aiming at reproducing Vim's behaviour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tushar Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-31 13:51:28:
I recently upgraded from vim 7.0 to vim 7.1 (on ubuntu feisty) by
compiling the vim7.1 tarball.
Did you make install from the tarball?
If compiled from tarball, the prefix defaults to /usr/local, while the
ubuntu
Hi,
Is it possible from a first gvim session to init a second gvim session
in diff mode?
And this diff mode should then use the two files that are used in the
first gvim session?
So if A.TXT and B.TXT are used in the first, the second should show
the difference in the second gvim session?
HI Vimmers,
Is it possible to have a horizontal text to run horizontally on
marquee ?
regards,
Srini...
Hi All,
I saw one of my friends (once!) copying the text from the line right
above. He was using some keycombo and it would appear like he was
copying the characters one-by-one. So, if there are two lines like
quick brown fox
I see
and on the 2nd line, after 'see', i wanted to copy 'brown fox'
Le 31 mai 07 à 15:14, Ajay Gupta a écrit :
Hi All,
I saw one of my friends (once!) copying the text from the line right
above. He was using some keycombo and it would appear like he was
copying the characters one-by-one. So, if there are two lines like
quick brown fox
I see
and on the 2nd
Ajay Gupta schrieb:
Hi All,
I saw one of my friends (once!) copying the text from the line right
above. He was using some keycombo and it would appear like he was
copying the characters one-by-one. So, if there are two lines like
quick brown fox
I see
and on the 2nd line, after 'see', i
Hi,
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for custom
mappings etc?
Maybe a dumb question but I hate having to unlearn something, I'd like
to create a fair number of mappings that use a consistent convention and
won't conflict with anything existing. I think Bram
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates
for custom mappings etc?
[snip]
I think Bram mentioned he's found prefixing with _ works
well..
I believe that the backslash (\) is the only stand-alone
lower-ASCII character available for mappings, and thus is the
default
Op donderdag 31 mei 2007, schreef Arn:
Hi,
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for
custom mappings etc?
Maybe a dumb question but I hate having to unlearn something, I'd
like to create a fair number of mappings that use a consistent
convention and won't conflict
[Andy Wokula]
Ajay Gupta schrieb:
I saw one of my friends (once!) copying the text from the line right
above.
:h i_Ctrl-Y
At first, I had some difficulty remembering Ctrl-Y, until I decided that
Y was a picture of what was going on: that is, funneled from above.
Now, I use it very
[Arn]
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for custom
mappings etc?
The usual is \ followed by something. I initially fought this
convention, because \ is a bit hard to type on my keyboard, and tried
other things instead, with various levels of conflicts and
Hi Arn :)
* Arn [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for custom
mappings etc?
Maybe a dumb question but I hate having to unlearn something, I'd like
to create a fair number of mappings that use a consistent convention and
won't
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:15:18AM -0400, François Pinard wrote:
I think Bram mentioned he's found prefixing with _ works well..
The _ key is sometimes suggested as well, and some say it is unused.
But this is not true, _ is a very useful command for me (it brings the
cursor back at the
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, David Nečas wrote:
If you close and reopen Vim, the last search pattern is remembered -- or
not -- in the viminfo file. (It is one of the registers.) The search
history can also be saved. See :help 'viminfo'.
Yes, search history is being saved.
And since this
François Pinard wrote:
At first, I had some difficulty remembering Ctrl-Y, until I decided that
Y was a picture of what was going on: that is, funneled from above.
Now, I use it very often. Ctrl-E copies from the line below, often
useful too, yet it is harder to see an upside-down Y into E
Tushar Desai wrote:
I had done a make install for vim7.1 and that's how the
/usr/local/share/vim71/... dir structure was created on my machine.
Also, the directory is plugin and not plugins (which was my typo
in the email).
The makeparens.vim plugin has stopped working in Fedora Core 6 as
Eric Leenman wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible from a first gvim session to init a second gvim session
in diff mode?
And this diff mode should then use the two files that are used in the
first gvim session?
So if A.TXT and B.TXT are used in the first, the second should show
the difference in the
On 5/31/07, Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, David Nečas wrote:
If you close and reopen Vim, the last search pattern is remembered -- or
not -- in the viminfo file. (It is one of the registers.) The search
history can also be saved. See :help 'viminfo'.
Arn wrote:
Hi,
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for custom
mappings etc?
Maybe a dumb question but I hate having to unlearn something, I'd like
to create a fair number of mappings that use a consistent convention and
won't conflict with anything existing. I
DervishD wrote:
Hi Arn :)
* Arn [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Any suggestions on keys/key combos that are good candidates for custom
mappings etc?
Maybe a dumb question but I hate having to unlearn something, I'd like
to create a fair number of mappings that use a consistent convention and
On Thursday 31 May 2007, fREW wrote:
...
If this list had a FAQ, it would probably contain this issue and the
large file issue (and maybe something about bottom posting :-P ) So
you are certainly not alone.
1)What is the large file issue? (you can just point me to archives, if any)
thanks
tim
Hi Tony :)
* A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
But I'd say the F keys are the safest in general, especially when
taking portability into account.
Of course: if you plan to use more than one vim or more than one
keyboard type, the F keys are the best choice. In fact, for complex
DervishD wrote:
Hi Tony :)
* A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
But I'd say the F keys are the safest in general, especially when
taking portability into account.
Of course: if you plan to use more than one vim or more than one
keyboard type, the F keys are the best choice. In
Hi,
I'm using gVim on windows. I've created an lzx.vim syntax file and dropped it
into C:\Program Files\Vim\vim70\syntax.
It works fine if I execute:
:cal setSyn(lzx)
However this syntax is not available from the syntax menu and vim does not
automatically use this syntax when I open files
Sorry if this is known but this is a really cool way to have a Vim/Firefox
marriage. :)
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4125
Cheers,
Keith
DM wrote:
Hi,
I'm using gVim on windows. I've created an lzx.vim syntax file and dropped it
into C:\Program Files\Vim\vim70\syntax.
It works fine if I execute:
:cal setSyn(lzx)
However this syntax is not available from the syntax menu and vim does not
automatically use this syntax when I
Hi,
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even though it is
still inside the buffer list.
--
Виктор Кожухаров /Viktor Kojouharov/
see my comments interspersed and at bottom
Tushar Desai wrote:
Thanks Tony; here's the output
:scriptfiles
/usr/local/share/vim/vim71/plugin/cscope_maps.vim
2: /usr/local/share/vim/vim71/plugin/getscriptPlugin.vim
3: /usr/local/share/vim/vim71/plugin/gzip.vim
4:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even though it is
still inside the buffer list.
I /think/ the undo
On 5/31/07, Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007, fREW wrote:
...
If this list had a FAQ, it would probably contain this issue and the
large file issue (and maybe something about bottom posting :-P ) So
you are certainly not alone.
1)What is the large file issue? (you
I have two files which I'd like to compare via diffsplit in an
existing vim session - trying to do so by issuing ':diffsplit
filename' when the other one is already in the window gets me the
error:
E97: Cannot create diffs
I can properly open the diff in a separate instance via 'vimdiff',
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even though it is
still inside the buffer list.
Just to make sure I understand, you're talking about
В чт, 2007-05-31 в 16:19 -0500, Tim Chase написа:
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even though it is
still inside the buffer
В чт, 2007-05-31 в 22:09 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck написа:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo levels, even
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
В чт, 2007-05-31 в 22:09 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck написа:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to retain the undo levels, even when the buffer is not
loaded in any windows/tabs? Right now, whenever I open another file in
a window, the previous file loses it's undo
Lev Lvovsky wrote:
I have two files which I'd like to compare via diffsplit in an existing
vim session - trying to do so by issuing ':diffsplit filename' when
the other one is already in the window gets me the error:
E97: Cannot create diffs
I can properly open the diff in a separate
On May 31, 2007, at 3:02 PM, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Lev Lvovsky wrote:
I have two files which I'd like to compare via diffsplit in an
existing vim session - trying to do so by issuing ':diffsplit
filename' when the other one is already in the window gets me
the error:
E97: Cannot create
Tushar Desai wrote:
Hi Tony,
which patches are you referring to? if download latst vim7.1 tarball,
will it have the patches?
thanks for your help,
-tushar.
No. The patches are in ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.1/ and are _in
addition_ to the tarball which is 7.1.0.
See
mostly when I press {, I have to press one more } after, because
they are always appears at the same time! the same as () [], and
also the quote mark(). so I wonder how can I add the feature that when
I insert { or the other punctuations above, it will automatically add
} !!!
besides, I
On 1 Jun 2007 06:00:36 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
vim@vim.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removed from the vim mailing list, please send an empty reply
to this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31/05/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
[...]
A friend told me that he is developing a Firefox addon to emulate the
Vi/Vim behaviors in all text areas in Firefox, without launching
external applications. I'm looking forward to it.
[...]
I don't think any Vim
Hi all,
I'm Ian, one of the two students working on improving the regexp
engine in Vim for this year's Google Summer of Code. I haven't had a
whole lot to contribute as of yet, but now that work is underway, I'll
probably pop up here asking lots of questions some days.
Right now we're working
I have also heard good things about the PCRE (Perl Compatible Regex
Library). You may want to consider it as an option.
http://www.pcre.org/
-Brian
On 5/31/07, Ian Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm Ian, one of the two students working on improving the regexp
engine in Vim for this
On 5/31/07, Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also heard good things about the PCRE (Perl Compatible Regex
Library). You may want to consider it as an option.
PCRE is crap.
It is crap, because it uses the same, crappy, backtracking method that
Vim, and most other crappy regex (note:
On 5/31/07, Ian Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm Ian, one of the two students working on improving the regexp
engine in Vim for this year's Google Summer of Code. I haven't had a
whole lot to contribute as of yet, but now that work is underway, I'll
probably pop up here asking lots of
Ian Young wrote:
I have a couple questions to start things off. First: I couldn't see
much need for 'fuzzy matching' in Vim, but some of you are probably
much better acquainted with regexp use cases than I am. Would this be
a useful feature to have available?
As you likely know, fuzzy
On 5/31/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I think could be more useful would be boolean logic for regexp. My
LogiPat
plugin provides this capability, but undoubtedly it'd be better if
somehow it could be
incorporated. The resulting patterns from LogiPat seem to me to be
On 5/31/07, Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would be even cooler would be to use regular relations, as that
would allow for far superior substitution possibilities to what
:substitute has to offer.
(Someone asked off-list what regular relations were. If anyone else
is
Hello, all.
I was recently helping someone out with a vim script (camelcasemotion.vim)
which adds additional motion commands (they treat camel-cased words
(WordsLikeThis) as separate words, rather than as a single word). This is
easy enough to do in normal and operator-pending mode. It seems
On 1 Jun 2007 05:59:49 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
vim-dev@vim.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removed from the vim-dev mailing list, please send an empty reply
to this address:
[EMAIL
56 matches
Mail list logo
