RE: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-23 Thread Gene Kwiecinski
often well beyond those of the present line. I had been used to this deleting up to 999 characters, but only up to the end of the present line. It appears that the set compatible Ummm, 'D' doesn't work?

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-20 Thread panshizhu
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-19 15:42:15: This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following: runtime vimrc_example.vim if and when we want to further customize Vim, we'll add more lines below Best regards, Tony. -- I always recommend include the contents

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-20 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-19 15:42:15: This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following: runtime vimrc_example.vim if and when we want to further customize Vim, we'll add more lines below Best regards, Tony. -- I always

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uh oh... I spoke slightly too soon. Although the up/down/delete functions that I first asked about now behave normally, the vim -N -u NONE -i NONE option now results in 999 dspace deleting 999 characters, often well beyond those of the

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-19 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Gary Johnson wrote: [...] One way to make sure that vim starts in non-compatible mode is to make sure you have a .vimrc file in your HOME directory, even if the file is empty. [...] This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following: Vim startup file Preferences which

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will hopefully be an easy question or two... An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently, and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as: [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread David Pike
-0700 From: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vim@vim.org Subject: Re: repeating up/down/delete commands On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This will hopefully be an easy question or two... An upgraded version of vim

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread David Pike
). snip Again, thanks, - David. Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:39:54 -0700 From: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vim@vim.org Subject: Re: repeating up/down/delete commands On 2007-05-18, David Pike

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Franco Saliola
In response to David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In case you don't know about these, here are commands that will do the same thing. [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the file that I am editting, gg [N] down to quickly get to the last line of the file G Also, while

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
David Pike wrote: This will hopefully be an easy question or two... An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently, and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as: [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the file that I am editting, [N]

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
David Pike wrote: Uh oh... I spoke slightly too soon. Although the up/down/delete functions that I first asked about now behave normally, the vim -N -u NONE -i NONE option now results in 999 dspace deleting 999 characters, often well beyond those of the present line. I had been used to

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Nelson Castillo
To delete from cursor to end of line, use d$ Is it so hard to remember? Also: D Regards. -- http://arhuaco.org http://emQbit.com