Adri Verhoef wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 20:40:45 +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ getpid() Return a Number which is the process ID of the Vim process.
+ On Unix this is a unique number. On
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Milan Vancura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it was Zdenek's original request...
Come to think of it, get_ppname could be even more important than
get_ppid.
Bram: If you agree that this is useful, I can try my hands at a patch, so you
don't have to. It is
On 20/02/2008, Richard Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Tony Mechelynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean that it is not the process ID of the Vim process?
No, what he meeans is: after a process exits, its PID may (usually not
immediately) be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:21 AM, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same caveats apply on Windows, which wasn't clear in Bram's help text.
I assumed Bram counted Windows towards DOS, thus not offering a PID at all?
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
Hi,
I have the following in my .vimrc:
nmap C-Up :cprevCR
nmap C-Down :cnextCR
to navigate quickly between compiler errors. I noticed though that when
using these mappings I don't get closed folds opening automatically
despite quickfix is specified in the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Ben Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's unique during the period that the Vim process is running, which is
the
only time the function can be called, and the only time the concept of a
process
ID really makes sense! I think 'unique' here didn't
On 20/02/2008, Richard Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:21 AM, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The same caveats apply on Windows, which wasn't clear in Bram's help
text.
I assumed Bram counted Windows towards DOS, thus not offering a PID at
all?
Patrick Texier wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:39:34 +0100, Dominique Pelle a écrit dans le
message [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
It initially works fine, but when I scroll up, only
1 line (sometimes 2) get highlighted instead of 3.
After a scroll up, Vim highlights a multiline pattern only if first
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Tony Mechelynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Texier wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:39:34 +0100, Dominique Pelle a écrit dans le
message [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
It initially works fine, but when I scroll up, only
1 line (sometimes 2) get
I assumed Bram counted Windows towards DOS, thus not offering a PID at all?
No, Windows does have PID's, supported by the new Vim getpid() function. I
agree
the docs are unclear on this. Would be better if they had 'Unix and Windows'.
Ben.
Send instant messages to your online friends
Of course. But being able to generate/query a value and to reliably use it as
a
unique value are vastly different.
I think you *can* reliably use it as a unique value (though only within the
context of the process running), so I don't think these are vastly different. I
personally think
11 matches
Mail list logo
