Re: Rendering glitches on FreeBSD

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie John Little
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:24:15 AM UTC+12, Mikkel H wrote: Can anyone help me figure out how to debug this issue, perhaps even fix it? The TERM environment variable on the FreeBSD box is the first thing. It must match the capabilities of what's on the mac, iTerm2 or Terminal.app. Logged

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ingo Karkat wrote: On 16-May-2012 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT), Ben Fritz wrote: Or, how about just a clone of the main Vim repository? Often runtime file changes are related to changes in the Vim code. Often? Vim has superb backward compatibility, and the thing that started this thread is

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:15:34 PM UTC-5, Ingo Karkat wrote: On 16-May-2012 08:35:30 -0700 (PDT), Ben Fritz wrote: Or, how about just a clone of the main Vim repository? Often runtime file changes are related to changes in the Vim code. Often? Vim has superb backward compatibility,

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hello Bram, Excerpt from Bram Moolenaar: -- snip -- Including patches for runtime files doesn't take much of my time, under the condition that I can include them as-is. Most time goes into reviewing the change and making sure it doesn't break anything. Or omits another change that was

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: Excerpt from Bram Moolenaar: -- snip -- Including patches for runtime files doesn't take much of my time, under the condition that I can include them as-is. Most time goes into reviewing the change and making sure it doesn't break anything. Or omits another change

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hello Bram and Ben, Excerpt from Bram Moolenaar: -- snip -- Including patches for runtime files doesn't take much of my time, under the condition that I can include them as-is. Most time goes into reviewing the change and making sure it doesn't break anything. Or omits another change that

Completion menu closes when it shouldn't

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Benjamin Fritz
I was trying to reproduce an issue I've been having in a minimal config, and failed to reproduce it reliably, but ended up finding what looks like a new issue. Perhaps they are related. First, the issue I was *trying* to reproduce: Sometimes while using a completion menu, either Eclim's

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 1:07:52 PM UTC-5, Thilo Six wrote: To me absolutely yes. Obviously we will need to discuss and decide some more details/workflows but i think the consensus is broad enough to start getting it productive. Are you fine with using vim-dev as our mailinglist for all

Re: Completion menu closes when it shouldn't

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:14:01 PM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote: First, the issue I was *trying* to reproduce: Sometimes while using a completion menu, either Eclim's user-completion these days, or the built-in omni-completion for C code in the past, the menu will inexplicably disappear.

Re: Does it still make sense to have per-file/-type maintainers? [Was: Re: Added support for spell checking in runtime/syntax/ocaml.vim]

2012-05-17 Fir de Conversatie Gary Johnson
On 2012-05-17, Thilo Six wrote: I would require that we gain at least 7 individuals with commit access. This is to somewhat grant that always someone is around who can do the job. Anyone who is interested to volunteer for this please speak up now. I am interested. Regards, Gary -- You