On 13 March 2015, Andre Sihera wrote:
> On 13/03/15 11:36, Charles wrote:
> >>>Please, don't start this again. Search the archives for the
> > > >previous Git vs. Mercurial pissing contests, and for why
> > > >neither actually matters.:)
> > Seriously, is using that kind of fli
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 339 by lcd...@gmail.com: Minor w_curswant bug
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=339
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Create a buffer with the contents:
0123456
789
2. :set virtualedit=
3. put the cursor on "4"
I have a suggestion.
We should create/obtain an organization which have good simple name like "vim"
on bitbucket/github, for accesibility and convenience of end-users.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying
On 13 March 2015, Andre Sihera wrote:
> On 13/03/15 03:41, LCD 47 wrote:
> >On 12 March 2015, Taro MURAOKA wrote:
> >> It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial
> >> to git.
> >>
> >> We (vim-jp) have been maintaining a mirror on github already.
> >>
> >> https://github.com
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:31:19PM +0900, Andre Sihera wrote:
> A lot of people have expressed simply technical reasons for choosing a
> successor to Google code. However, more than the technical reasons, the
> financial stability and political strategy of the company must not be
> forgotten.
I ag
Bram Moolenaar於 2015年3月13日星期五 UTC+8上午3時28分45秒寫道：
> Bruno Sutic wrote:
>
> > It appears google code is shutting down:
> > http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
> >
> > Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > I know I'd be more than delight
Did this ever get resolved? I just ran into the exact same issue. My current
workaround is to set this:
nnoremap w :set buftype=:w
But that is a hack I should not have to do. How does buftype get reset between
saves?
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 9:02:41 AM UTC-5, Sergei G wrote:
> I just i
On 13/03/15 05:24, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Do, 12 Mär 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> > > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > > >I know I'd be more th
2015-03-13 11:00 GMT+08:00 Navdeep Parhar :
> The "source of truth" vim repository is in mercurial right now and
> everyone here has already figured out how to use their favorite VCS with
> it. So a move to bitbucket won't disrupt anyone's workflow too much.
> But a move to git *will* affect thos
On 13/03/15 11:36, Charles wrote:
Please, don't start this again. Search the archives for the
>> > >previous Git vs. Mercurial pissing contests, and for why neither
>> > >actually matters.:)
>> > Seriously, is using that kind of flippant and arrogant remark the best
>> > argument you ca
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:39:08PM -0600, Christian J. Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Charles wrote:
>
> >I think both mercurial/git and github/bitbucket are both great options so
> >the problem is less technical and more preference. I suggest to put an
> >online vote and see which option
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Charles wrote:
I think both mercurial/git and github/bitbucket are both great
options so the problem is less technical and more preference. I
suggest to put an online vote and see which option the majority of
vim community prefer.
I agree with this. My preference would
I think both mercurial/git and github/bitbucket are both great options
so the problem is less technical and more preference.
I suggest to put an online vote and see which option the majority of
vim community prefer.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:13 AM, 陈世用 wrote:
> It's time to move forward. Github p
It's time to move forward. Github please!
2015-03-13 9:50 GMT+08:00 Guyzmo :
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:53:58AM +0900, Andre Sihera wrote:
> > On 13/03/15 03:41, LCD 47 wrote:
> > >On 12 March 2015, Taro MURAOKA wrote:
> > >>> It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:53:58AM +0900, Andre Sihera wrote:
> On 13/03/15 03:41, LCD 47 wrote:
> >On 12 March 2015, Taro MURAOKA wrote:
> >>> It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial to git.
> >>> > We (vim-jp) have been maintaining a mirror on github already.
> >>>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Also further testing shows, this seems only to happen, as long as the
> number column is smaller than the showbreak chars. I can't explain that.
I think it happens if the following conditions are true:
1. The line is long such that it
On 13/03/15 04:58, Bruno Sutic wrote:
But yes, I think a move to Github would mean more than just changing the URL in
the instructions.
If it's any worth, I'd gladly volunteer and invest time to help with this.
That's an excellent start. You may well be taken up or your offer!
Please continue
On 13/03/15 03:41, LCD 47 wrote:
On 12 March 2015, Taro MURAOKA wrote:
> It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial to git.
>
> We (vim-jp) have been maintaining a mirror on github already.
>
> https://github.com/vim-jp/vim
Please, don't start this again. Se
On 3/12/2015 4:17 PM, Erik Falor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:38:23PM -0700, Ben Fritz wrote:
Mercurial also is a lot easier to pick up with fewer
concepts that need understanding. So I think people who occasionally
need to dabble in Mercurial are probably better off than people who
occasi
[Whoops, meant to reply to the list, too. Sorry for the spam, Ben]
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:38:23PM -0700, Ben Fritz wrote:
> I think it's just that
> more people these days use git,
This is my point, no more, no less. I don't think that Mercurial is
technically inferior to git. It is simply le
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 10 Mär 2015, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> > When I type 0 (zero) followed by Ctrl-D on a line that's indented by
> > more than one 'shiftwidth', I expect all the indentation of the
> > current line to be deleted and the 0 deleted, as described in ":help
> > i_0_CTRL
Michael Soyka wrote:
> A while back, the mingw Makefile was split into two: Make_ming.mak and
> Make_cyg_ming.mak. The first of the two files has definitions for
> CFLAGS and WINRES_FLAGS; Make_cyg_ming.mak is then included and those
> two make variables are reinitialized (just below "end of
On 3/12/2015 12:58 PM, Bruno Sutic wrote:
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 8:28:45 PM UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Suggestions are welcome.
It's possible to use a local Mercurial repository with Github, right?
So the instructions on how to get Vim would only need to change the URL.
Github unfort
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 10:27:14 AM UTC-7, Bruno Sutic wrote:
> It appears google code is shutting down:
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>
> Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> I know I'd be more than delighted if it was h
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 3:27:43 PM UTC-5, ewfalor wrote:
>
> I just signed up for a Bitbucket account, and all of the new-user
> tutorials I'm presented with encourage me to start a git repo. In
> fact, I've only seen Mercurial mentioned once so far. Is Bitbucket
> leaning towards git now,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:01:30PM -0400, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> > >
> > > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > > >I know I'd be more t
Hi Bram!
On Do, 12 Mär 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> > >
> > > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
>
On 2015-03-12, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> > >
> > > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> > >
> > > Bitb
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 8:28:45 PM UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Bruno Sutic wrote:
>
> > It appears google code is shutting down:
> > http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
> >
> > Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > I know I'
Hi Nazri!
On So, 08 Mär 2015, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > This only happens in vi mode (or more specifically, when cpo contains
> > the 'n' flag). Looks like Vim gets confused, because the first visible
> > screen line already shows the sbr
Hey all, I'm a developer (and Vim addict) for Bitbucket over at Atlassian. Let
me know if you need anything should you decide Bitbucket be the next home for
Vim. We'd love to have you!
Will
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:28:45 PM UTC-7, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Bruno Sutic wrote:
>
> > It ap
Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> >
> > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> >
> > Bitbucket please. They have Mercurial.
> >
> > Git sucks.
Bruno Sutic wrote:
> It appears google code is shutting down:
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>
> Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
Suggestions are welcome.
It's
On 12 March 2015, Taro MURAOKA wrote:
> It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial to git.
>
> We (vim-jp) have been maintaining a mirror on github already.
>
> https://github.com/vim-jp/vim
Please, don't start this again. Search the archives for the
previous Git vs.
It is not difficult to migrate/sync the repository from mercurial to git.
We (vim-jp) have been maintaining a mirror on github already.
https://github.com/vim-jp/vim
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to
On 12 March 2015, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> >
> > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved? I know
> > >I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> >
> > Bitbucket please. They have Mercurial.
> >
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 12:46:32 PM UTC-5, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> >
> > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> >
> > Bitbucket
Open a buffer with this content:
0123456
789
then disable virtualedit:
:set virtualedit=
then go to number 4. Move down a line, then move back up. The cursor
will move to 9, then to 4; so far, so good.
Now move down a line, set ruler:
:set ruler
then move back up. The cursor will
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:46:03AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> >
> > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> > Bitbucket please. They
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 338 by dbarn...@google.com: ":breakadd func" on empty function
breaks on any subsequent vimscript
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=338
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Define an empty "Foo" function i
Comment #1 on issue 338 by dbarn...@google.com: ":breakadd func" on empty
function breaks on any subsequent vimscript
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=338
Incidentally, the existing behavior is actually pretty useful, and I'd
suggest adding a ":breakadd next" to break on next
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> > Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
> >
> > >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> > >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
> >
> > Bitbucket please. They have
On 2015-03-12, zeug wrote:
> Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
>
> >Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
> >I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
>
> Bitbucket please. They have Mercurial.
>
> Git sucks.
SourceForge has Mercurial, too, and im
Am 2015-03-12 18:27, schrieb Bruno Sutic:
Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
Bitbucket please. They have Mercurial.
Git sucks.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Ty
It appears google code is shutting down:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
Any thoughts on where will vim source code repo be moved?
I know I'd be more than delighted if it was hosted on Github.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist
Hi Gary!
On Di, 10 Mär 2015, Gary Johnson wrote:
> When I type 0 (zero) followed by Ctrl-D on a line that's indented by
> more than one 'shiftwidth', I expect all the indentation of the
> current line to be deleted and the 0 deleted, as described in ":help
> i_0_CTRL-D". However, if a CursorHold
Hello Kiichi,
2015/3/11(Wed) 18:28:28 UTC+9 Ozaki Kiichi:
> > * ":.bnext" == go next buffer,
> > * ":+bnext" == go 2nd next buffer, same as ":.+1bnext".
> > * ":.wincmd r" == go next window
> > * ":+wincmd r" == go 2nd next window, same as ":.+1wincmd r"
> >
> > Thus it can be said that present "
47 matches
Mail list logo
