On Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:31:11 AM UTC-4, Nazri wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
No, I don't want to remove or deprecate existing options. It's very
annoying for people who get a new Vim version, especially if they didn't
install it
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:56:01 PM UTC-5, sxc...@g.rit.edu wrote:
Is there any movement with this patch? What are Bram's thoughts on it?
Bram's thoughts were that he doesn't want any new option for this.
But patch 7.3.1115 changes the 'number' and 'relativenumber' options so that
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
No, I don't want to remove or deprecate existing options. It's very
annoying for people who get a new Vim version, especially if they didn't
install it themselves.
I'm not sure the whole 'linenumber' option thing is
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:31:11 AM UTC-5, Nazri wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
No, I don't want to remove or deprecate existing options. It's very
annoying for people who get a new Vim version, especially if they didn't
install it
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:31:11PM +0800, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
No, I don't want to remove or deprecate existing options. It's very
annoying for people who get a new Vim version, especially if they didn't
install it
Sorry, but think this change without keeping an original behavior may just be
too fast. Consider a workflow when you deal with files with a lot if lines.
This is not too great for the line gutter to take a lot of space. This is
actually why I use relative numbers - useful and doesn't take much
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22:44PM -0700, Dmitry Gorbik wrote:
Sorry, but think this change without keeping an original behavior
may just be too fast. Consider a workflow when you deal with files
with a lot if lines. This is not too great for the line gutter to
take a lot of space. This is
I just thought that it will have a huge psychological effect. Right now the
brain is adjusted to the way numbers go from 0. Seeing some arbitrary number
right near your code is not the best thing. Bram says it's annoying for people
when we mess with existing settings, isn't this one of them? A
On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:00:29 PM UTC-7, toothpik wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22:44PM -0700, Dmitry Gorbik wrote:
Sorry, but think this change without keeping an original behavior
may just be too fast. Consider a workflow when you deal with files
with a lot if lines. This is
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
For example:
:set number
:set relativenumber
:set linenumber=number
:set number? relativenumber? linenumber?
number norelativenumber linenumber=number
Yes, this is what the patch does. See the
Lech Lorens wrote:
On 5 February 2013 17:02, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and hairier! But not that much. I'd say it's less
在 2013年1月30日星期三UTC+8上午5时33分42秒，Bram Moolenaar写道：
Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Paul Ruane wrote:
Whilst it is not that hard to scan the status line, I find that I hit
this glitch in my workflow many, many times a day: when I want to know
what line I
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Lech Lorens wrote:
On 5 February 2013 17:02, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and hairier! But not that much. I'd
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and hairier! But not that much. I'd say it's less toy-ish by
now :)
It contains a bugfix - set (inv|no)(nu|rnu) did not correctly set
'linenumber' as well.
Earlier in the thread someone complained about the alignment
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and hairier! But not that much. I'd say it's less toy-ish by
now :)
It contains a bugfix - set (inv|no)(nu|rnu) did not correctly set
On 5 February 2013 17:02, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and hairier! But not that much. I'd say it's less toy-ish by
now :)
It
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 10:22:59 AM UTC-6, Lech Lorens wrote:
On 5 February 2013 17:02, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is an updated patch for the 'linenumber' option (it's getting
hairier and
Gvim is getting the attached behaviour (number column not aligned correctly)
after building 798.
Is this intended ? cool feature, by the way.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information,
Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch do not include Christian's fix for the problem
reported by François Ingelrest.
Attached is the updated (and less buggy) toy patch that include
Christian's fix and test89, and also test90 for
On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:22:09 AM UTC+13, Charles Campbell wrote:
Thank you -- I'll try it out (but I'm having troubles getting gtk
enabled for vim for some odd reason, and am working on that)
Just in case you haven't, you've tried yum-builddep? (I mucked about for a
while before
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch do not include Christian's fix for the problem
reported by François Ingelrest.
Attached is the updated (and less buggy) toy patch that include
Christian's fix and test89, and also test90 for testing the
new option
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Charles E Campbell
drc...@campbellfamily.biz wrote:
When some users of some simulation s/w I helped write have a problem, I
usually end up with 10-150G long debugging traces; I usually break these up
into 1G chunks and edit (more usually, examine) these. So I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Charles E Campbell
drc...@campbellfamily.biz wrote:
Ben Fritz wrote:
I only rarely edit files with 1 or more lines. Most of the time for
me, my 'rnu' column takes 4 columns, and my 'nu' column takes 5. I don't
care about the extra width, and would
Ben Fritz wrote:
I only rarely edit files with 1 or more lines. Most of the time for me, my
'rnu' column takes 4 columns, and my 'nu' column takes 5. I don't care about
the extra width, and would probably never turn off the option to show the
absolute number on the current line if there
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
This looks like a good solution. I'll include it. With Christian's
addition.
I think I found a case where the 'relativenumber' option is reset. I'm
sending this report in this thread, although I don't know if it's
caused by the recent
On Wed, January 30, 2013 08:07, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
For better distinction the current line number ca be left-aligned
(for left-to-right text orientation) to make it look different than the
relative-line-numbers (I made
Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
For better distinction the current line number ca be left-aligned
(for left-to-right text orientation) to make it look different than the
relative-line-numbers (I made no attempt at this in the
Fantastic, thanks guys.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I think the current line number (rnu) should be idented like the rest (even if
LineNr should be identical to CursorLineNr). Right now it looks a little bit
ragged on the left side. What speaks against right-aligning the current line
number?
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
Hi,
I asked on the Vim reddit (http://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/
17gg56/) if anyone knew how to achieve this with existing
functionality or plug-in but apparently not. I would simply like to
have the option, when relativenumber is turned on, to have the current
line show the absolute line
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Paul Ruane paul.ru...@oniony.com wrote:
Whilst it is not that hard to scan the status line, I find that I hit
this glitch in my workflow many, many times a day: when I want to know
what line I am on, I intuitively scan the gutter for the line number.
I then
Paul Ruane wrote:
Hi,
I asked on the Vim reddit (http://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/
17gg56/) if anyone knew how to achieve this with existing
functionality or plug-in but apparently not. I would simply like to
have the option, when relativenumber is turned on, to have the current
line show
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:18:28 AM UTC-6, Charles Campbell wrote:
Paul Ruane wrote:
Hi,
I asked on the Vim reddit (http://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/
17gg56/) if anyone knew how to achieve this with existing
functionality or plug-in but apparently not. I would simply
On Tue, January 29, 2013 15:51, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Paul Ruane paul.ru...@oniony.com wrote:
Whilst it is not that hard to scan the status line, I find that I hit
this glitch in my workflow many, many times a day: when I want to know
what line I am on, I
Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Paul Ruane paul.ru...@oniony.com wrote:
Whilst it is not that hard to scan the status line, I find that I hit
this glitch in my workflow many, many times a day: when I want to know
what line I am on, I intuitively scan the gutter for
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I think the information is useful. Who is against showing the current
line number instead of zero?
Is the width of the column a problem?
Not if its optionally a part of relative numbering.
Regards,
C Campbell
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 4:48:18 PM UTC-6, Charles Campbell wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I think the information is useful. Who is against showing the current
line number instead of zero?
Is the width of the column a problem?
Not if its optionally a part of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
For better distinction the current line number ca be left-aligned
(for left-to-right text orientation) to make it look different than the
relative-line-numbers (I made no attempt at this in the patch below).
Here's a new
38 matches
Mail list logo
