Hi Christian,
2016/9/21 Wed 5:31:26 UTC+9 Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi,
> I think I found a bug with lambda expressions.
>
> I was looking into writing some automated tests and was trying to use
> the new lambda expressions. However this does not work as expected:
>
> Here is an example:
>
Hi,
I think I found a bug with lambda expressions.
I was looking into writing some automated tests and was trying to use
the new lambda expressions. However this does not work as expected:
Here is an example:
#v+
let a = ['FOOBAR"word"', 'FOOBAR"word2"']
let
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> Title is as it is.
>
> Merit:
> - Compiler optimizations will be a bit smarter.
> - Execution speed will be a bit faster.
> - Compiler us warn the code assignment wrong.
>
> Demerit:
> - None. (maybe)
>
> I made a patch for proposal.
> How about this?
>
> When it's
Patch 8.0.0006
Problem:":lb" is interpreted as ":lbottom" while the documentation says it
means ":lbuffer".
Solution: Adjust the order of the commands. (haya14busa, closes #1093)
Files: src/ex_cmds.h
*** ../vim-8.0.0005/src/ex_cmds.h 2016-08-29 22:42:20.0
Gary Johnson wrote:
> While grepping for a certain string under $VIMRUNTIME, I discovered
> that syntax/cdl.vim contains a NUL (^@) in a comment (at line 33).
> This causes grep to classify it as a binary file and file to
> classify it as data.
>
> The NUL should be removed and replaced with a
Hi Bram and list,
Title is as it is.
Merit:
- Compiler optimizations will be a bit smarter.
- Execution speed will be a bit faster.
- Compiler us warn the code assignment wrong.
Demerit:
- None. (maybe)
I made a patch for proposal.
How about this?
When it's Okay, I'll continue with the
On 2016-09-20, 01:15 GMT, Gary Johnson wrote:
> I tried to send email to the maintainer, Raul Segura Acevedo,
> but it was returned because the recipient address was rejected
> by the remote host.
>
> Would someone like to take over maintainership of that file
> and fix this? I can fix it, but
