On Tue, 12/13/16, itchyny wrote:
Subject: Re: stl, stlnc of fillchars are not always applied, depends on
difference between StatusLine and StatusLineNC
To: "vim_dev"
Cc:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 1:26:30 AM UTC+9, Ozaki Kiichi wrote:
> It is better to add it for an unit test.
>
> maka -C src test_fillchars
Thank you for your notice, it's surely useful.
Here is the latest patch.
https://gist.github.com/itchyny/936f5c7e7f6396bf2f6afbe246206d47
Regards,
On Tue, 12/13/16, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Subject: Re: [vim/vim] gtk3 gui substantially slower than gtk2 (#1199)
To: "vim/vim"
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2016, 2:12 AM
This seemed to get quite
* Gary Johnson [2016-12-13 01:45]:
> argc() and argv() aren't sufficient?
No. These functions work with *files* in the argument list of the
current window.
--
Dmitri Vereshchagin
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your
On Mon, 12/12/16, Ozaki Kiichi wrote:
Subject: Re: Questions about vim_iswordc() and vim_iswordp()
To: "vim_dev"
Cc: gclient.g...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, December 12, 2016, 11:59 PM
> They
On 2016-12-12, Dmitri Vereshchagin wrote:
> It may be useful to have access to the command line arguments as a List stored
> in v:argv variable. For example one may use it to check if Vim was invoked
> without any arguments and open file browser automatically
>
> " ~/.vim/after/plugin/netrw.vim
>
Dominique wrote:
> In Vim main help page (runtime/doc/help.txt),
> there is a link |pi_logipat.txt| which is broken.
>
> Fixed in attached patch.
Thanks!
--
In a world without walls and borders, who needs windows and gates?
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net --
Charles E Campbell wrote:
> Dominique Pellé wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> In Vim main help page (runtime/doc/help.txt),
>> there is a link |pi_logipat.txt| which is broken.
>>
>> Fixed in attached patch.
>>
> Thank you, Dominique -- I'll include that change. It is a leftover from
> its incorporation as a
> They should both respect 'iskeyword' for characters up to 255.
> So it looks like vim_iswordp() needs to be fixed.
>
Thank you. OK, my above patch has reflected this fix.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are
Dominique Pellé wrote:
> Hi
>
> In Vim main help page (runtime/doc/help.txt),
> there is a link |pi_logipat.txt| which is broken.
>
> Fixed in attached patch.
>
Thank you, Dominique -- I'll include that change. It is a leftover from
its incorporation as a part of vim.
Chip Campbell
--
--
You
Hi
Attached patch adds completion for:
:syntax spell
:syntax sync
Regards
Dominique
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received
Hi
In Vim main help page (runtime/doc/help.txt),
there is a link |pi_logipat.txt| which is broken.
Fixed in attached patch.
Regards
Dominique
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
Ozaki Kiichi wrote:
> > when c == 0xA0, p == "\xC2\xA0", and 'iskeyword' includes 160
> >
> > (e.g. iskeyword=@,48-57,_,128-167,224-235 (default on windows))
> >
> > then: vim_iswordc(c) == 1, but vim_iswordp(p) == 0.
>
> After all, in the above case, should vim_iswordc(c) and vim_iswordp(p)
> when c == 0xA0, p == "\xC2\xA0", and 'iskeyword' includes 160
>
> (e.g. iskeyword=@,48-57,_,128-167,224-235 (default on windows))
>
> then: vim_iswordc(c) == 1, but vim_iswordp(p) == 0.
After all, in the above case, should vim_iswordc(c) and vim_iswordp(p) be
whether TRUE or FALSE?
--
--
> Sorry, there's no need to add the test in Makefile because I added into
> test_alot.vim. I fixed the patch.
It is better to add it for an unit test.
maka -C src test_fillchars
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
> Thank you Bram. I've got the point.
> How about this patch?
> I noticed the note in syntax.txt but still believe that the patch solves the
> strange behavior
> that most people will not configure what's going on until look into the
> source code.
>
Sorry, there's no need to add the test in
Hi All,
2016-12-12(Mon) 21:58:29 UTC+9 Lifepillar:
> I think noinsert or noselect is ignored only when completeopt includes menu
> instead of menuone.
>
>
> That would be more acceptable for me, too. My plugin requires menuone, so it
> would not be affected.
Hmm, Your requires item is
17 matches
Mail list logo