George V. Reilly wrote:
2008/6/26 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I also updated the NSIS installer, but I don't think that is relevant.
Speaking of which, how do you actually build gvim72a.exe? I tried to
build a Vim installer several months ago and gave up in complete
Karten Hopp wrote:
Bram Moolenaar schrieb:
Hello Vim users,
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all
patches, updated runtime files and some more.
I expect this to be reasonable stable,
[...]
Looks almost OK. This should be slightly better:
dnl sys/ptem.h depends on sys/stream.h on Solaris 9
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(sys/ptem.h, [], [],
[#if defined HAVE_SYS_STREAM_H
# include sys/stream.h
#endif])
Just a nitpick, it's for sure Solaris 8 till latest development build,
so plain
George V. Reilly wrote:
2008/6/25 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrick Texier wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime
files
gvim.exe
Bram Moolenaar schrieb:
Hello Vim users,
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all
patches, updated runtime files and some more.
I expect this to be reasonable stable, since most of the patches have
been
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 22:38, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
Compiled and installed fine on Ubuntu 8.04 with GTK2.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French):
I have an alert box Program start error:
Hi Vimmers,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Vim 7.2a is also available from CVS (as soon as it finishes uploading).
Subversion will follow later.
http://www.vim.org/cvs.php
http://www.vim.org/subversion.php
The 7.2a BETA is
Hi,
Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit:
./configure says
checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: check
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
[...]
Oh, didn't know that there's make test :)
When I run it, I can see
== make test ===
make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src'
if test -n
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
[...]
Oh, didn't know that there's make test :)
When I run it, I can see
== make test
===
make[2]: Leaving
== make test
===
make[2]: Leaving directory `/share/chroot/on81/tmp/vim72a/src'
if test -n -a -f po/Makefile; then \
cd po; make -f Makefile check VIM=../vim; \
fi
if test vim != vim -a ! -e
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$
rcsdiff -u Makefile
===
RCS file: Makefile,v
retrieving revision
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message
I have to admit that it sounds so.
[...]
I can't find a GNU autoconf macro to test
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
Ah, I never said that the test fails, but looking at my previous message
I have to admit that it sounds so.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Vladimir Marek wrote:
[...]
Makefiles are not generated, as you noted.
[...]
By the way, which version of Solaris are you on? Just wondering how
long this will persist.
Solaris 9 and also latest development. It will persist, noone dares to
touch
Patrick Texier wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition 4.10..A French):
I have an alert box
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but
I'm happy to attach one :)
Thanks
--
Vlad
--- Makefile.orig st črn
On 25/06/08 13:48, Hugh Sasse wrote:
I've messed this up. I *do* get the test statement to fail, but
it carries on anyway, because of the leading - sign. I've done this:
brains hgs 29 % rcsdiff -u !$
rcsdiff -u Makefile
===
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that single letter change would not require diff, but
I'm happy to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:25:00PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Good point. I suggest you submit a patch to Bram. I'd do this for you,
especially as it's small, but you should get the credit for the fix.
Well, I thought that
Dnia Wednesday 25 of June 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
Hello Vim users,
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
Compiles, Tests ALL DONE, runs fine on Mandriva 2008.0, GTK2, Huge.
m.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev
John Beckett wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
I have done a successful compile, build, run and 'make test' on:
- Windows XP
- Fedora 8 Linux
test11.in has:
Note: This test will fail if gzip is not available.
test30.in perhaps should
Vladimir Marek wrote:
Solaris 9 + SunStudio 12 seems to work fine. Just single nit:
./configure says
checking sys/ptem.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: sys/ptem.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure:
2008/6/25 Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Patrick Texier wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:38:14 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
MS-WINDOWS one-size-fits-all:
pc/gvim72a.exe self-installing, includes all runtime files
gvim.exe doesn't run on Windows 98 (Second Edition
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 25-Jun-08 2:05am -0600, Edward L. Fox wrote:
[...]
svn co
https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/vim7.2/
In the top level of your checking-out directory to switch to 7.2
branch.
Note:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
compiled successfully with uclibc-0.9.29 + gtk-1.2.10 on DetaolB.
Test results:
ALL DONE
nice work!
Thanks!
--
Christian
--
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux
On 24/06/08 22:38, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hello Vim users,
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.2a BETA
This is a BETA release of Vim 7.2. It consists of Vim 7.1 plus all
patches, updated runtime files and some more.
I expect this to be reasonable stable, since most of the patches
28 matches
Mail list logo
