>> I did a --prefix=/usr
> That's a bad idea. You should never put your own
> things in /usr/bin since it's meant to be managed by
> apt packages. You can mess up your Ubuntu packages
> when doing that.
Point taken.
On my next VM I will leave the prefix and see why I may have changed it so
long
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 9:38:37 AM UTC+13, Dominique Pelle wrote:
> You'll need to make sure that /usr/local/bin is in your path
> before /usr/bin which I think is normally the case by
> default on Ubuntu.
I just checked on an uncustomized instance of 16.04, and indeed /usr/local/bin
David Fishburn wrote:
> Thank you gentlemen, I have a working GUI Vim now on Ubuntu.
>
> One last problem.
>
> gvim
> :ver
> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled Nov 24 2016 16:44:48)
> Included patches: 1-1689
> Extra patches: 8.0.0056
> Modified by
Thank you gentlemen, I have a working GUI Vim now on Ubuntu.
One last problem.
gvim
:ver
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled Nov 24 2016 16:44:48)
Included patches: 1-1689
Extra patches: 8.0.0056
Modified by pkg-vim-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Compiled by
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:30:56 PM UTC+13, David Fishburn wrote:
> I can't really think what else to try to install to get the GUI support.
In all that you didn't do
sudo apt-get build-dep vim-gnome
I booted into a xenial iso just now. This gives a vanilla, out-of-the-box
xenial
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:30 AM David Fishburn wrote:
>
> I am having a hard time getting gvim to compile on Ubuntu 16.04
...snip...
> I can't really think what else to try to install to get the GUI support.
Try this:
# First install package needed to build vim
$ sudo apt-get build-dep vim-gnome
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:18 PM Ken Takata wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> 2018/11/6 Tue 10:30:56 UTC+9 David Fishburn wrote:
> > I am having a hard time getting gvim to compile on Ubuntu 16.04
> >
> >root
> > When I run this:
> >
> >
> > ./configure --enable-gui
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > checking for X...
Hi David,
2018/11/6 Tue 10:30:56 UTC+9 David Fishburn wrote:
> I am having a hard time getting gvim to compile on Ubuntu 16.04
>
>
> When I run this:
>
>
> ./configure --enable-gui
>
>
>
>
> checking for X... (cached) no
> checking if X11 header files can be found... yes
> checking
Thanks for the response Christian.
> and uncomment the `#deb-src` lines.
Here is the updated sources.
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted
deb-src
On Mo, 05 Nov 2018, David Fishburn wrote:
> I am having a hard time getting gvim to compile on Ubuntu 16.04
>
> When I run this:
>
> ./configure --enable-gui
>
> checking for X... (cached) no
> checking if X11 header files can be found... yes
> checking --enable-gui argument... no GUI
I am having a hard time getting gvim to compile on Ubuntu 16.04
When I run this:
./configure --enable-gui
checking for X... (cached) no
checking if X11 header files can be found... yes
checking --enable-gui argument... no GUI support
checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... (cached) no
This is a
On 23/11/09 14:55, bill lam wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Mr.SpOOn wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to compile Vim on a fresh installed Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit.
Last time I compiled Vim I followed this guide:
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htm
I think someone here in the list pointed
difference between gtk version and gnome version is the session
support. to enable gnome session support you should edit the Makefile or
give command-line option to .configure, no additional dependencies required.
Compiling vim on Ubuntu is a very easy task and it definitely do not
require
On 23/11/09 16:23, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
Saluton Mr.SpOOn :)
Mr.SpOOnm...@gmail.com skribis:
[...]
Well, there are archives to download them easier, so that would not be
a problem. The problem would be to patch them all. I shall write a
script for that. I was just wondering if
Tony Mechelynck 写道:
Avoiding
handmade changes to the Makefile also ensures that _patches_ to the
Makefile will apply cleanly.
If you use svn then nothing will broken. at least patches to Makefile
never have problem for me.
patches to the Makefile will merge with my own handmade changes.
Saluton Mr.SpOOn :)
Mr.SpOOn m...@gmail.com skribis:
I'd like to compile Vim on a fresh installed Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit.
Last time I compiled Vim I followed this guide:
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htm I think
someone here in the list pointed me to that link.
Very
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:33:20PM +0100, Mr.SpOOn wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to compile Vim on a fresh installed Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit.
Last time I compiled Vim I followed this guide:
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htm
I think someone here in the list pointed me to that
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
Tricky. Unless you really HATE some option (or support) that came with
one of the flavors of VIM (tiny, small, big, huge), I strongly
recommend you to stick to one of these. Probably a big version will be
enough for you. In any case, :help feature-list and
Hi Carlo!
Mr.SpOOn wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to compile Vim on a fresh installed Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit.
Last time I compiled Vim I followed this guide:
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htm
I think someone here in the list pointed me to that link.
I have just some question:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Mr.SpOOn wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to compile Vim on a fresh installed Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit.
Last time I compiled Vim I followed this guide:
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/vim/compunix.htm
I think someone here in the list pointed me to that link.
In addition to
Saluton Mr.SpOOn :)
Mr.SpOOn m...@gmail.com skribis:
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
Tricky. Unless you really HATE some option (or support) that came with
one of the flavors of VIM (tiny, small, big, huge), I strongly
recommend you to stick to one of these. Probably a big version will
be
2009/11/23 Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado raul...@gmail.com:
Saluton Mr.SpOOn :)
Mr.SpOOn m...@gmail.com skribis:
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
;) Well, then you can use a huge version and fine tune the
configuration. It is not the easiest thing on Earth, though. And
remember: some
Saluton Mr.SpOOn :)
Mr.SpOOn m...@gmail.com skribis:
Well, there are archives to download them easier, so that would not
be a problem. The problem would be to patch them all. I shall write
a script for that. I was just wondering if I had to download all of
them.
rsync will download only
23 matches
Mail list logo
