Re: [VirtualGL-Users] VirtualGL-2.3.4 rpm doesn't install on RHEL 6

2014-03-27 Thread DRC
Should be fixed in the latest pre-release build. Confirmed to be an issue with Fedora 19 and 20 and the official VirtualGL 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 RPMs (as well as any pre-releases of 2.3.4 up until now.) Of course, Fedora also ships their own package for VirtualGL now, so it's less of an issue if ou

Re: [VirtualGL-Users] VirtualGL-2.3.4 rpm doesn't install on RHEL 6

2014-03-26 Thread Kevin Van Workum
My mistake, we have several distributions that we test new packages on and I got confused. The rpm didn't install on my FC-20 test machine. Installs fine on RHEL-6.4, RHEL-6.5, CentOS-6.4, CentOS-6.5. The specific error is: file /usr/lib64 from install of VirtualGL-2.3.4-20140326.x86_64 conflicts

Re: [VirtualGL-Users] VirtualGL-2.3.4 rpm doesn't install on RHEL 6

2014-03-26 Thread DRC
In reading this again, it occurs that you might be trying to say that removing this line stopped the error. I still need to know, though, whether you experience the error with the 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 RPMs (which also contain the line.) And I'm still confused as to why I don't see the error. This

Re: [VirtualGL-Users] VirtualGL-2.3.4 rpm doesn't install on RHEL 6

2014-03-25 Thread DRC
I cannot reproduce this, but let's back up for a minute. There is no version 2.3.4 yet. Thus, you are using either a pre-release build or your own build that was made from subversion, or possibly someone else's build. In that case, I need to know where the build came from. If it's one of my

[VirtualGL-Users] VirtualGL-2.3.4 rpm doesn't install on RHEL 6

2014-03-24 Thread Kevin Van Workum
Installing the VirtualGL-2.3.4.x86_64.rpm fails with a conflict on /usr/lib64. I don't know much about packing rpms, but I think the culprit is: $ diff -c VirtualGL.spec.in.1 VirtualGL.spec.in.2 *** VirtualGL.spec.in.1 2014-03-24 09:51:35.378948234 -0400 --- VirtualGL.spec.in.2 2014-03-24 09:52:34