Should be fixed in the latest pre-release build. Confirmed to be an issue with Fedora 19 and 20 and the official VirtualGL 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 RPMs (as well as any pre-releases of 2.3.4 up until now.) Of course, Fedora also ships their own package for VirtualGL now, so it's less of an issue if our RPM doesn't work on that platform, but I still want it to work. There are certain things you can't do with theirs, such as running setuid apps.
On 3/26/14 9:23 AM, Kevin Van Workum wrote: > My mistake, we have several distributions that we test new packages on > and I got confused. The rpm didn't install on my FC-20 test machine. > Installs fine on RHEL-6.4, RHEL-6.5, CentOS-6.4, CentOS-6.5. The > specific error is: > > file /usr/lib64 from install of VirtualGL-2.3.4-20140326.x86_64 > conflicts with file from package filesystem-3.2-19.fc20.x86_64 > > I'm guessing it's an issue with the rpm version on FC-20, > rpm-4.11.2-2.fc20.x86_64. In the other distros, /usr/lib64 is also owned > by filesystem. > > I tried both downloading the nightly build from > http://virtualgl.sourceforge.net/vgl.nightly.2.3.x and building it from > source as well. To get the rpm to install on FC-20, I had to remove the > "%dir %{libdir}" line. > > Sorry for the confusion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ VirtualGL-Users mailing list VirtualGL-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
