On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
> On 24.04.2012 21:22, DRC wrote:
>
> -fg is not relevant in my case unfortunately, but I doubt it would
> solve the underlying theoretical issue anyway.
Well, all I can say is that there are thousands of people using TurboVNC in
multi-user
On 24.04.2012 21:22, DRC wrote:
> On 4/24/12 5:34 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
> Bear in mind that TurboVNC was shipped by Sun as a product for 4
> years,
> and it was designed to be run in an SGE environment. You probably
> need
> to launch it with the -fg switch when running in SGE.
-fg is not
On 4/24/12 5:34 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
> Looking at the script, there's a pretty obvious race condition.
> (by the way: http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/2007-April/057455.html
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3123682&group_id=14067&atid=114067
> )
>
> The script loops
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:55:40 -0500
DRC wrote:
> TurboVNC's version of vncserver isn't doing anything substantially
> different from the equivalent script in RealVNC, TigerVNC, etc. in terms
> of picking the display number.
Looking at the script, there's a pretty obvious race condition.
(by the w
On 4/24/12 4:47 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
> there seems to be some kind of race condition when starting multiple
> "vncserver" at the same time.
> The scripts seem to pick the same DISPLAY value to us, so only one of them
> succeeds because Xvnc can't be started twice on the same DISPLAY.
>
> Is
