RE: local host vs local address

2004-09-24 Thread Wall, John
James Weatherall[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 5:49 PM > To: 'Wall, John'; 'Ward, Stuart'; 'VNC List'; 'Chris Goodwin' > Subject: RE: local host vs local address > > John at al, > > The notion of VN

RE: local host vs local address

2004-09-24 Thread James Weatherall
localhost. Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wall, John > Sent: 24 September 2004 00:19 > To: Ward, Stuart; VNC List; 'Chris Goodwin' > Subject: RE: local host vs local address > >

RE: local host vs local address

2004-09-23 Thread Wall, John
: VNC List > Subject: RE: local host vs local address > > This may be related to SP2 issue that a recent fix has been put out for by > MS. > > Stu > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 20

RE: local host vs local address

2004-09-23 Thread Wall, John
bind. John > -- > From: Chris Goodwin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply To: Chris Goodwin > Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 1:18 AM > To: Ward, Stuart; VNC List > Subject: Re: local host vs local address > > Thanks, Stuart, this particular s

Re: local host vs local address

2004-09-23 Thread Chris Goodwin
ROTECTED]> To: "VNC List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: RE: local host vs local address > This may be related to SP2 issue that a recent fix has been put out for by > MS. > > Stu > > -Original Message- >

RE: local host vs local address

2004-09-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
w in advance > when I need to reach my machine ... > > -Message d'origine- > De : James Weatherall [mailto:jnw "at" realvnc.com] Envoyi : lundi > 13 septembre 2004 12:59 @ : 'Big Max Leo'; > vnc-list "at" realvnc.com Objet : RE: local host v

RE: local host vs local address,

2004-09-13 Thread James Weatherall
00 and > RealVNC works fine. > I like to use it as a service, as I never know in advance > when I need to reach my machine ... > > -Message d'origine- > De : James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyi : lundi > 13 septembre 2004 12:59 @ : 'Big Ma

RE: local host vs local address,

2004-09-13 Thread James Weatherall
hen I run it as a service, and > takes 192.168.0.100 when I launch it manually :-) > > > > > -Message d'origine- > De : James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyi : lundi > 13 septembre 2004 12:45 @ : 'Big Max Leo'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet :

RE: local host vs local address,

2004-09-13 Thread James Weatherall
Max, Can you explain precisely what you mean by "takes the right IP"? Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: Big Max Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 September 2004 11:32 > To: 'James Weatherall'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

RE: local host vs local address,

2004-09-13 Thread James Weatherall
Max(?), Have you checked that you don't have "Only accept connections from the local machine" ticked in the Connections tab of the VNC Server (Service-Mode) Options panel? Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Big Ma

Re: local host vs local address,

2004-09-12 Thread Steven D. Clark
I have a similar setup and use a static IP for my VNC server. Your DHCP server most likely has a range of IP addresses used for its clients (ie 192.168.0.100 - 150). If you set the IP address on your VNC server to something outside the range of your DHCP server but still on the same subnet (ie 192.

Re: local host vs local address,

2004-09-12 Thread rsmmail04-realvnc
You should probably look into using static IP's for your three computers. I'm not sure why VNC would take the .100 IP when started manually and the .1 when started as a service. But in anycase, if you set all your PC's to use static IP's then you can your your prot forwarding function of your