Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Feby Francis
Its works fine for me from Verizon –Georgia wireless line. Feby Francis From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:32 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Thanks Kidd, Here’s a

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's tandems in a specific LATA? Adam -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps]

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Alex Balashov
On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote: So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's tandems in a specific LATA? The broad answer is yes, but specific answers will vary with the LECs' interconnection arrangements, which could entail some private interconnects. --

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
OK, I'll keep opening trouble tickets when something is reported... Sigh... -Original Message- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:56 AM To: voiceops@voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 On

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
Thanks everyone for your help. I hope to be able to pay it forward someday. Adam From: Kidd Filby [mailto:kidd.fi...@corp.forethought.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:23 AM To: Adam Vocks Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Just got off the phone with Verizon. Funny...

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Graham Freeman
Test results: Verizon Wireless in California: success Sonic Telecom: dead air Sprint (via Ting): dead air Graham Freeman Sent from my mobile On 14 Jul 2014, at 15:09, Adam Vocks adam.vo...@cticomputers.com wrote: Hi everyone, I stumbled on this list recently and have been reading

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Nick Crocker
VZW out of Austin, TX successful call completion to the test TN -Nick On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Graham Freeman gfree...@sungevity.com wrote: Test results: Verizon Wireless in California: success Sonic Telecom: dead air Sprint (via Ting): dead air Graham Freeman Sent from my

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier. So what you really need is every IXC in the country to make sure they have a

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Adam Vocks
I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code. Some tried a call on level3 to us which failed. Odd things is that Level3 is directly connected to the Tandem we subtend. I wouldn't think Level3 would send it off their network??? Adam -Original Message- From: VoiceOps

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Jamie O. Montgomery
/listinfo/voiceops -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140715/a26b43cd/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:58:28 -0500 From: Nick Crocker nick.croc

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
Level 3 is a big wholesale route for a lot of smaller IXC carriers and VoIP providers, so when they fix it, you'll probably see immense improvement. On 07/15/2014 02:10 PM, Adam Vocks wrote: I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code. Some tried a call on level3 to us

Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

2014-07-15 Thread Paul Timmins
Level 3 is a big wholesale route for a lot of smaller IXC carriers and VoIP providers, so when they fix it, you'll probably see immense improvement. On 07/15/2014 02:10 PM, Adam Vocks wrote: I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code. Some tried a call on level3 to us