Thanks everyone for your help.  I hope to be able to pay it forward someday.

 

Adam

 

From: Kidd Filby [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:23 AM
To: Adam Vocks
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

 

Just got off the phone with Verizon.  Funny... the call works now from Denver.  
I'm guessing now but, I think it was an overflow/re-route issue I hit this 
morning.  While the call went through, their 2nd tier is investigating any 
re-routes that may have happened and will "call me back".  The point is, I 
believe Verizon's network is probably clean... this time.

I'll try to get envoy on the stick now.  This might be the needle....

Kidd

________________________________

From: "Adam Vocks" <[email protected]>
To: "Kidd Filby" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:05:31 AM
Subject: RE: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777




Thanks, that makes me feel better.  We just found out there’s a problem with 
Level3 that level3 is working backwards for us.

 

Adam

 

From: Kidd Filby [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:54 AM
To: Adam Vocks
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

 

Adam;

No problem.  Glad to help.

In 30 years, I have never heard of such a wide-spread issue with a single code. 
 This leads me to believe there is a small group of carriers or even just one 
really LOW COST carrier out there who have/has not loaded your code and they 
seem to be in a lot of people's routing table within an LCR or similar.  Time 
of day, overflow, congestion... all of these can throw intermittent issues at 
you as well.

No... you wont have to test every cell tower.. it will just feel that way.  
Honestly, its got to be a commonality as I mentioned above.  In an LD route, 
the originating switch is only going to look at NPA-NXX (Most of the time, 
sometimes just NPA) and route out to a carrier.  The carrier will route the 
call to the destination LATA (Most of the time) and the local LATA/interLATA 
(of the destination TN) tandem will route to the end office switch.  The local 
& interLATA tandems must be OK, since the call completes, sometimes.  Do you 
have any directly connected carriers the call does not work over?  That may be 
a route you can backwards troubleshoot with.

Good luck;
Kidd

________________________________

From: "Adam Vocks" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:31:40 AM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777



Thanks Kidd,

 

Here’s a question for the group..

 

Verizon cell here locally works find, am I going to have to test every single 
Verizon cell tower in the country???  Geesh, there’s got to be a better way to 
get these codes out to people.

 

Adam

 

From: Kidd Filby [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:28 AM
To: Adam Vocks
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

 

Verizon cell in Colorado says the number's been disconnected.  Envoy, I get 
fast busy.  AT&T cell in Colorado is good.

________________________________

From: "Adam Vocks" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:09:44 PM
Subject: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777

Hi everyone,

 

I stumbled on this list recently and have been reading through the archives.  
Thanks for all the information you’ve all shared.

 

We’re a CLEC in Illinois and are in the middle of building a FTTH network in 
our home town.  In December our exchange 217-777 was effective.  We’re using 
ANPI’s Tandem service for our Feature Group D traffic and using our ILEC 
(Consolidated Communications) as our intralata/local tandem.

 

No troubles on the Intralata/local terminating traffic, however, we’re having 
more and more reports of different people out in the world that can’t call our 
customers.

 

It started with AT&T Cellular, that’s been resolved, then we heard from Sprint 
PCS, that’s been resolved.  Next was Comcast Business, that’s been resolved.

 

Latest example is a caller from Texas who is on Time Warner Cable:

 

LRN: 12543004000

OCN: 583C

LATA: 556

CITY: WACO

STATE: TX

LEC: TIME WARNER CBLE INFO SVC (TX) DBA TIME WARNER CBL

 

When they call us they just get dead air.

 

I guess my questions are:  How long after the effective date in the BIRRDS 
database do all of the switches get updated?  Is this a typical problem with a 
new exchange/LRN?

 

A follow up question: is there a service out there that will originate calls 
from many different telcos and if they fail, open up a ticket with that 
carrier?  I’m running into roadblocks calling these carriers since I am not a 
customer.

 

I’ve got a test number set up on 217-777-0001, “Thank you for Calling.  You 
have reached a test number.  Your telephone number is… “  if there’s anyone out 
there who wants to give it a test and report back, fine by me.  It seems the 
more information I have the better.

 

Thanks for listening,

 

Adam Vocks

 

 


_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


-- 

Thanks and have a GREAT day!!

Kidd Filby
FORETHOUGHT.Net
Dir. Voice Networks
O: 303.815.1837
E:  [email protected]
C:  661.557.5640


_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


-- 

Thanks and have a GREAT day!!

Kidd Filby
FORETHOUGHT.Net
Dir. Voice Networks
O: 303.815.1837
E:  [email protected]
C:  661.557.5640



-- 

Thanks and have a GREAT day!!

Kidd Filby
FORETHOUGHT.Net
Dir. Voice Networks
O: 303.815.1837
E:  [email protected]
C:  661.557.5640



_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to