No, but highly curated access to the Bandwidth API is common. I cannot confirm
or deny that we do a lot of that, but I mean, I wouldn’t deny it per se.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Jul 7, 2021, at 10:18 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
>
> > I don't know of
> I don't know of any resellers of Bandwidth that would allow you direct
access to the Bandwidth API. The API is based on Account and you'd have
access to the full reseller account.
I believe Bandwidth allows subaccounts.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021, 10:08 PM Peter Beckman wrote:
> I've been happy
I've been happy with Bandwidth. Started with them mid-2015. They handle
most of our inbound and outbound calling and SMS. APIs do what we need for
the most part (there are some limits in viewing their inventory that I'm
not a fan of), SMPP connections never die, tickets get addressed quickly,
at
We use clearip.com for our fraud protection along with our Inteliquent trunks.
ClearIP also handles our STIR/SHAKEN, LCR and CNAM
-Matt
From: VoiceOps on behalf of Colton Conor
Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 4:26 PM
To: Carlos Alvarez
Cc: VoiceOps
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth vs
Do either Bandwidth or Inteliquent have any fraud / overspending limits you
can put in place? I have looked at something like thinQ in the past, and
was impressed that their platform could put limits in place, like if
international calls exceed $1,000 in a day, block all calls. I know this is
more
In Illinois, it's both, with a strong preference to SIP.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Timmins"
To: "Rob Verk" , "Mike Hammett"
Cc:
INDigital's system they built with Penninsula FiberNet in Michigan is SIP, with
private ethernet connectivity to PFN's switches (not public IP networks). Not
sure about other states.
From: VoiceOps on behalf of Rob Verk
Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 2:55 PM
For termination, I'd say Inteliquent wins for full coverage and we haven't
had any tickets with them. They pass my manual dial tests for hard to reach
areas with low PDD and excellent audio quality. Bandwidth's OnNet partial
coverage is solid but I've not had good luck with their full coverage
We moved all of our services off of Inteliquent. The support was absolute
garbage, and they constantly raised rates a little at a time. We took 20%
off our costs going to Bandwidth, and support is lightning fast. Coverage
is identical as far as we can see in the US. Most of our term and
I have used both - Inteliquent, by far, has better coverage and support
(should you need it) - Bandwidth also sends a lot of their outbound traffic
to Inteliquent... So if you have an issue with outbound calls, they
typically have to open a ticket with Inteliquent.
If I have an urgent issue, I
Bandwidth by far is a much better company and service provider IMHO.
Much better API, much better portal, much better service, much better
management and culture.
I know that Inteliquent may have better coverage and we do have a partner
that says a lot of good things about them.
However, from my
I would expect Inteliquent to have a much greater coverage.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Colton Conor"
To: "VoiceOps"
Sent: Wednesday, July 7,
If you had to choose only between these two providers for wholesale
services, which would you choose and why? We are only considering these two
as the softswitch we are planning on using (Netsapiens) has only built out
Group MMS support for these two carriers APIs, and no one else.
I have used
At the suggestion of this mailing list, I started pursuing the IVP/IPES route
instead of trying to do my expansions via CLEC authority.
I've had conversations with a few companies to enable the IPES services,
Verizon, Inteliquent, Intrado (West), and Peerless. I haven't talked to Wide
Voice
14 matches
Mail list logo
