Todd,
Since the KE5FX NVRAM download software works, that would seem to indicate
the GPIB is working, wouldn't it (download completes and checksums OK)?
Randy
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Randy Evans
wrote:
> Todd,
>
> The minimal quick test would be greatly
Todd,
The minimal quick test would be greatly appreciated if you have the time.
I know this is above and beyond what I would expect but it would be really
useful to see if there is any hope for the GPIB on this unit. I will do
the service note 13 procedure in the morning.
Thanks again,
Randy
Randy,
Short of swapping out the A5 digital board I have no other ideas. If you
don't have a NI or Agilent adapter, I am sure I can find a spare for you to
test.
There is a Service Note 3458A-13A that deals with GPIB communication
failures. There is a test within the document to see if a
Todd,
Same as before. Still not working. All it does is print out "HP3458A" on
the output console and then just sits there.
Randy
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Randy,
>
> I just remembered that I changed the duration from 30 minutes to 2
Randy,
I just remembered that I changed the duration from 30 minutes to 2 minutes
to speed up the test. I forgot to change it back.
Todd
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Randy,
>
> I just sent it. I haven't modified Martin's code yet. That can be
Randy,
I just sent it. I haven't modified Martin's code yet. That can be done once
you confirm it works for you.
Todd
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 10:12 PM, randyevans2688
wrote:
> Todd,
> If you don't mind, just send the code directly to me.
> Randy
>
> Sent from my
Todd,
If you don't mind, just send the code directly to me.
Randy
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Todd Micallef
Date: 12/30/17 6:40 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Discussion of precise voltage
measurement
Randy,
I have not written anything else for the 3458A using EzGPIB. If you have a
National Instruments or Agilent adapters, I have a handful of Python code I
use to measure some of my standards.
If you are reading the temperature from the HP meter, I would think that
the problem lies in how the
Todd, thanks for the help. Where will you post the new code?
BTW, do you have any very simple code that is likely to work. I am interested
in seeing if anything other than KE5FX's memory dump program will work on my
HP3458A.
Thanks again,
Randy
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Randy,
I found the Prologix adapters and have modified the code in the original
script. I am doing a test run now and will post the script when I am
certain I didn't make it worse.
Todd
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Randy Evans
wrote:
> Todd,
>
> I have swapped
Todd,
I have swapped cables, moved the Prologix adapter to both meters (Agilent
works, HP doesn't), tried Martins code as well as Xdevs's. I have not
tried another PC yet, maybe the next step.
Here is the code that Martin modified for two meters, as well as the
modified Xdev's code per your
Randy,
I will continue to look for my adapter. I haven't used it for quite a while.
I have seen similar issues and swapped cables, moved the adapter to the
other meter, etc... One of my cables was bad from one side of the connector
to the other (on the same end of the cable) and caused me lots
Todd,
I tried adding the line but it made no difference.
Randy
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Randy Evans
wrote:
> Todd,
>
> Does it matter where I put the line in the Init_Device procedure?
>
>
> procedure Init_Device;
> begin;
>
Randy,
You can add it after the last line with the OUTPUT_FORMAT
Todd
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Randy Evans
wrote:
> Todd,
>
> Does it matter where I put the line in the Init_Device procedure?
>
>
> procedure Init_Device;
> begin;
>
Randy,
I am the person that wrote that EzGPIB script. It was my first before I
moved on to Python and I have only written a couple for the different
meters I have on hand. Version 1.01 is the most current version I have for
the 3458A.
I see that I should have added at least one more command to
Todd,
I have version 1.01. Yes, please e-mail me your modified version. Maybe it
will help.
Thanks,
Randy
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Randy,
>
> Is there a version number at the top of the file? I had two versions (1.00
> and 1.01). I can't
Randy,
Is there a version number at the top of the file? I had two versions (1.00
and 1.01). I can't remember all that changed between the two since it has
been a while but I did find an additional timeout code that limited the
wait time for reading data to 1 minute. I am guessing I had a problem
17 matches
Mail list logo