RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. - Jed

Re: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Terry Blanton
Jed Rothwell wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even bother to call the magazine. He said it was poor taste which implies intent.

HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Jones Beene
Caveat: Some of the following is fact, some tinged with conspiracy theory, some closer to Sci-Fi, but the result is, hopefully… at least entertaining. Is it a bit cynical to assume that big swings in policy at the highest levels of government have usually been designed to benefit the privileged

Re: HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Wilfred Chipman
Jeane, Well, Jones sure has done it this time. This is the most amazing scenario, not to mention bit of detective work, I have come across in a long time. The science as well as the history is credible. Hot and warm fusion people for years have speculated about He3's value as a component in

RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Steven Krivit
I'd ask him personally, but I don't want to provoke him any more that I already have... and will... At 02:51 PM 8/8/2004 -0400, you wrote: This has to be some sort of mistake or misunderstanding. It is not anyone's idea of a joke, not even Park's. I suppose he was lazy and he did not even

RE: FW: WHAT'S NEW Friday, August 06, 2004

2004-08-08 Thread Jeff and Dorothy Kooistra
No, I think this is Park's idea of a joke--you can just bet that as soon as the news broke that Gene was dead, someone or other made sure Park heard about it. The man has not shown an ounce of class for as long as he's been doing his column, so why should he start now? Kooistra This has to

Re: HeHe three

2004-08-08 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:05:56 -0700: Hi, [snip] Caveat: Some of the following is fact, some tinged with conspiracy theory, some closer to Sci-Fi, but the result is, hopefully… at least entertaining. It certainly is. :) [snip] Is it also a prime (maybe the best)

Re: Podkletnov's latest claims

2004-08-08 Thread William Beaty
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, thomas malloy wrote: Hum, let's hope that independent researchers have more luck reproducing Podkletnov's latest claims then they did on his claims of antigravity. This is ALMOST a hobbyist project. Except that Podkletnov used superconductor pucks larger than 10cm