Re: MHFEG Molecular Hydrogen Free Energy Generator vs MAHG

2005-07-10 Thread Jones Beene
Fred, If this is true, and it sounds intriguing on first take, then seeking an "exact" harmonic of the 1.420 Ghz hydrogen line should make a significant difference. This would even be more compelling IMHO if the "hard-ball" collision you are hypothesizing resulted in the occasional 3.4 eV

Re: Re: MHFEG Molecular Hydrogen Free Energy Generator vs MAHG

2005-07-10 Thread Terry Blanton
From: Jones Beene By Jove, I think Sparber has it! If any experimenter is contemplating a replication - and is going to buy the similar Svetlana tube and then modify it for a replication, it would be highly recommended (and relatively easy) to add a valve and vacuum gauge to create a

the Razor's dull edge

2005-07-10 Thread Jones Beene
In looking at any new device claiming overunity, almost every observer who is willing to consider the possibility that mainstream physics is wrong on the larger issue (negentropy) - nevertheless still comes to the table with certain preconceived notions - often rather strongly held theories,

Re: the Razor's dull edge

2005-07-10 Thread Terry Blanton
From: Jones Beene The MAHG is a case-in-point. Is it really? I mean, after all, Harvey just posted an article about tests of the Casimir force as it relates to nanotechnology. ZPE does not violate the laws of thermodynamics. You only have to expand your horizons back to the origins of

Re: the Razor's dull edge

2005-07-10 Thread Christopher Arnold
Jones, That was a mosteloquent presentation andI found myself in complete agreement. Your math in other posts is far beyond mylimited mathematicalunderstanding, but yourprecise analysis of this situationimpressed me deeply. Any inventor claiming to have broken established laws of science